Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data

Lourens J. Waldorp, Hilde M. Huizenga, Raoul P.P.P. Grasman, Koen B.E. Böcker, Peter Molenaar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for the electro- or magnetoencephalogram is generally performed for each voxel separately. Derived from the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, such a statistical parametric map (SPM) ignores the spatial smoothing in hypothesis testing with distributed source models. For example, when intending to test a single voxel, actually an entire region of voxels is tested simultaneously. Because there are more parameters than observations, typically constraints are employed to arrive at a solution which spatially smooths the solution. If ignored, it can be concluded from the hypothesis test that there is activity at some location where there is none. In addition, an SPM on distributed source models gives the illusion of very high resolution. As an alternative, a multivariate approach is suggested in which a region of interest is tested that is spatially smooth. In simulations with MEG and EEG it is shown that clear hypothesis testing in distributed source models is possible, provided that there is high correspondence between what is intended to be tested and what is actually tested. The approach is also illustrated by an application to data from an experiment measuring visual evoked fields when presenting checker-board patterns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)114-128
Number of pages15
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2006

Fingerprint

Electroencephalography
Visual Fields
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anatomy
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Waldorp, L. J., Huizenga, H. M., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Böcker, K. B. E., & Molenaar, P. (2006). Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data. Human Brain Mapping, 27(2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20170
Waldorp, Lourens J. ; Huizenga, Hilde M. ; Grasman, Raoul P.P.P. ; Böcker, Koen B.E. ; Molenaar, Peter. / Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data. In: Human Brain Mapping. 2006 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 114-128.
@article{e64a34dcf6bc4c2aa0866183bdff8405,
title = "Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data",
abstract = "Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for the electro- or magnetoencephalogram is generally performed for each voxel separately. Derived from the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, such a statistical parametric map (SPM) ignores the spatial smoothing in hypothesis testing with distributed source models. For example, when intending to test a single voxel, actually an entire region of voxels is tested simultaneously. Because there are more parameters than observations, typically constraints are employed to arrive at a solution which spatially smooths the solution. If ignored, it can be concluded from the hypothesis test that there is activity at some location where there is none. In addition, an SPM on distributed source models gives the illusion of very high resolution. As an alternative, a multivariate approach is suggested in which a region of interest is tested that is spatially smooth. In simulations with MEG and EEG it is shown that clear hypothesis testing in distributed source models is possible, provided that there is high correspondence between what is intended to be tested and what is actually tested. The approach is also illustrated by an application to data from an experiment measuring visual evoked fields when presenting checker-board patterns.",
author = "Waldorp, {Lourens J.} and Huizenga, {Hilde M.} and Grasman, {Raoul P.P.P.} and B{\"o}cker, {Koen B.E.} and Peter Molenaar",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hbm.20170",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "114--128",
journal = "Human Brain Mapping",
issn = "1065-9471",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Waldorp, LJ, Huizenga, HM, Grasman, RPPP, Böcker, KBE & Molenaar, P 2006, 'Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data', Human Brain Mapping, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20170

Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data. / Waldorp, Lourens J.; Huizenga, Hilde M.; Grasman, Raoul P.P.P.; Böcker, Koen B.E.; Molenaar, Peter.

In: Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.02.2006, p. 114-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for EEG and MEG data

AU - Waldorp, Lourens J.

AU - Huizenga, Hilde M.

AU - Grasman, Raoul P.P.P.

AU - Böcker, Koen B.E.

AU - Molenaar, Peter

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for the electro- or magnetoencephalogram is generally performed for each voxel separately. Derived from the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, such a statistical parametric map (SPM) ignores the spatial smoothing in hypothesis testing with distributed source models. For example, when intending to test a single voxel, actually an entire region of voxels is tested simultaneously. Because there are more parameters than observations, typically constraints are employed to arrive at a solution which spatially smooths the solution. If ignored, it can be concluded from the hypothesis test that there is activity at some location where there is none. In addition, an SPM on distributed source models gives the illusion of very high resolution. As an alternative, a multivariate approach is suggested in which a region of interest is tested that is spatially smooth. In simulations with MEG and EEG it is shown that clear hypothesis testing in distributed source models is possible, provided that there is high correspondence between what is intended to be tested and what is actually tested. The approach is also illustrated by an application to data from an experiment measuring visual evoked fields when presenting checker-board patterns.

AB - Hypothesis testing in distributed source models for the electro- or magnetoencephalogram is generally performed for each voxel separately. Derived from the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, such a statistical parametric map (SPM) ignores the spatial smoothing in hypothesis testing with distributed source models. For example, when intending to test a single voxel, actually an entire region of voxels is tested simultaneously. Because there are more parameters than observations, typically constraints are employed to arrive at a solution which spatially smooths the solution. If ignored, it can be concluded from the hypothesis test that there is activity at some location where there is none. In addition, an SPM on distributed source models gives the illusion of very high resolution. As an alternative, a multivariate approach is suggested in which a region of interest is tested that is spatially smooth. In simulations with MEG and EEG it is shown that clear hypothesis testing in distributed source models is possible, provided that there is high correspondence between what is intended to be tested and what is actually tested. The approach is also illustrated by an application to data from an experiment measuring visual evoked fields when presenting checker-board patterns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32544433478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32544433478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hbm.20170

DO - 10.1002/hbm.20170

M3 - Article

C2 - 16035038

AN - SCOPUS:32544433478

VL - 27

SP - 114

EP - 128

JO - Human Brain Mapping

JF - Human Brain Mapping

SN - 1065-9471

IS - 2

ER -