i + 1 ≠ ZPD

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore the differences in nature and origin between two constructs that are used in the contemporary professional literature to explain the processes and consequences of language learning: i (input) + 1 and the Zone, of Proximal Development (ZPD). Each construct is situated with respect to its history and to the fundamental assumptions it makes about language, the mind, and society. A brief comparison is established between the ways each construct is used to interpret the role of social interaction in the classroom. Within this comparison, particular emphasis is placed on the implications of the ZPD, because this construct is the least familiar of the two within the professional discourses of language education in the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-425
Number of pages9
JournalForeign Language Annals
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

language education
language
classroom
discourse
history
interaction
learning
Society
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Kinginger, Celeste S. / i + 1 ≠ ZPD. In: Foreign Language Annals. 2001 ; Vol. 34, No. 5. pp. 417-425.
@article{170ceee4d3204fc1b600b881169ca2e7,
title = "i + 1 ≠ ZPD",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to explore the differences in nature and origin between two constructs that are used in the contemporary professional literature to explain the processes and consequences of language learning: i (input) + 1 and the Zone, of Proximal Development (ZPD). Each construct is situated with respect to its history and to the fundamental assumptions it makes about language, the mind, and society. A brief comparison is established between the ways each construct is used to interpret the role of social interaction in the classroom. Within this comparison, particular emphasis is placed on the implications of the ZPD, because this construct is the least familiar of the two within the professional discourses of language education in the United States.",
author = "Kinginger, {Celeste S.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02081.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "417--425",
journal = "Foreign Language Annals",
issn = "0015-718X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

i + 1 ≠ ZPD. / Kinginger, Celeste S.

In: Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 34, No. 5, 01.01.2001, p. 417-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - i + 1 ≠ ZPD

AU - Kinginger, Celeste S.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - The aim of this article is to explore the differences in nature and origin between two constructs that are used in the contemporary professional literature to explain the processes and consequences of language learning: i (input) + 1 and the Zone, of Proximal Development (ZPD). Each construct is situated with respect to its history and to the fundamental assumptions it makes about language, the mind, and society. A brief comparison is established between the ways each construct is used to interpret the role of social interaction in the classroom. Within this comparison, particular emphasis is placed on the implications of the ZPD, because this construct is the least familiar of the two within the professional discourses of language education in the United States.

AB - The aim of this article is to explore the differences in nature and origin between two constructs that are used in the contemporary professional literature to explain the processes and consequences of language learning: i (input) + 1 and the Zone, of Proximal Development (ZPD). Each construct is situated with respect to its history and to the fundamental assumptions it makes about language, the mind, and society. A brief comparison is established between the ways each construct is used to interpret the role of social interaction in the classroom. Within this comparison, particular emphasis is placed on the implications of the ZPD, because this construct is the least familiar of the two within the professional discourses of language education in the United States.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344410623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344410623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02081.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02081.x

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 417

EP - 425

JO - Foreign Language Annals

JF - Foreign Language Annals

SN - 0015-718X

IS - 5

ER -