Identifying and Predicting Profiles of Medical Noncompliance: Pediatric Caregivers’ Antibiotic Stewardship

Rachel A. Smith, Youllee Kim, Nkuchia M. M’Ikanatha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sometimes compliance with medical recommendations is problematic. We investigated pediatric caregivers’ (N = 606) patterns of noncompliance with antibiotic stewardship based on the obstacle hypothesis. We tested predictors of noncompliance framed by the obstacle hypothesis, dissonance theory, and psychological reactance. The results revealed four profiles of caregivers’ stewardship: one marked by compliance (Stewards) and three marked by types of noncompliance (Stockers, Persuaders, and Dissenters). The covariate analysis showed that, although psychological reactance predicted being noncompliant, it was types of obstacles and discrepant experiences that predicted caregivers’ patterns of noncompliance with antibiotic stewardship. Campaign planning often focuses on identifying the belief most associated with the targeted outcome, such as compliance. Noncompliance research, however, points out that persuaders may be successful to the extent to which they anticipate obstacles to compliance and address them in their influence attempts. A shift from medical noncompliance to patient engagement also affords an opportunity to consider how some recommendations create obstacles for others and to find positive ways to embrace conflicting needs, tensions, and reasons for refusal in order to promote collective goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)485-494
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2018

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Antibiotics
Caregivers
reactance
Compliance
caregiver
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Psychological Theory
Patient Participation
campaign
Psychology
planning
Research
Planning
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{1bf356ab13ae4e339a36ceeedabb2ba4,
title = "Identifying and Predicting Profiles of Medical Noncompliance: Pediatric Caregivers’ Antibiotic Stewardship",
abstract = "Sometimes compliance with medical recommendations is problematic. We investigated pediatric caregivers’ (N = 606) patterns of noncompliance with antibiotic stewardship based on the obstacle hypothesis. We tested predictors of noncompliance framed by the obstacle hypothesis, dissonance theory, and psychological reactance. The results revealed four profiles of caregivers’ stewardship: one marked by compliance (Stewards) and three marked by types of noncompliance (Stockers, Persuaders, and Dissenters). The covariate analysis showed that, although psychological reactance predicted being noncompliant, it was types of obstacles and discrepant experiences that predicted caregivers’ patterns of noncompliance with antibiotic stewardship. Campaign planning often focuses on identifying the belief most associated with the targeted outcome, such as compliance. Noncompliance research, however, points out that persuaders may be successful to the extent to which they anticipate obstacles to compliance and address them in their influence attempts. A shift from medical noncompliance to patient engagement also affords an opportunity to consider how some recommendations create obstacles for others and to find positive ways to embrace conflicting needs, tensions, and reasons for refusal in order to promote collective goals.",
author = "Smith, {Rachel A.} and Youllee Kim and M’Ikanatha, {Nkuchia M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2018.1471109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "485--494",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Identifying and Predicting Profiles of Medical Noncompliance : Pediatric Caregivers’ Antibiotic Stewardship. / Smith, Rachel A.; Kim, Youllee; M’Ikanatha, Nkuchia M.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 23, No. 5, 04.05.2018, p. 485-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying and Predicting Profiles of Medical Noncompliance

T2 - Pediatric Caregivers’ Antibiotic Stewardship

AU - Smith, Rachel A.

AU - Kim, Youllee

AU - M’Ikanatha, Nkuchia M.

PY - 2018/5/4

Y1 - 2018/5/4

N2 - Sometimes compliance with medical recommendations is problematic. We investigated pediatric caregivers’ (N = 606) patterns of noncompliance with antibiotic stewardship based on the obstacle hypothesis. We tested predictors of noncompliance framed by the obstacle hypothesis, dissonance theory, and psychological reactance. The results revealed four profiles of caregivers’ stewardship: one marked by compliance (Stewards) and three marked by types of noncompliance (Stockers, Persuaders, and Dissenters). The covariate analysis showed that, although psychological reactance predicted being noncompliant, it was types of obstacles and discrepant experiences that predicted caregivers’ patterns of noncompliance with antibiotic stewardship. Campaign planning often focuses on identifying the belief most associated with the targeted outcome, such as compliance. Noncompliance research, however, points out that persuaders may be successful to the extent to which they anticipate obstacles to compliance and address them in their influence attempts. A shift from medical noncompliance to patient engagement also affords an opportunity to consider how some recommendations create obstacles for others and to find positive ways to embrace conflicting needs, tensions, and reasons for refusal in order to promote collective goals.

AB - Sometimes compliance with medical recommendations is problematic. We investigated pediatric caregivers’ (N = 606) patterns of noncompliance with antibiotic stewardship based on the obstacle hypothesis. We tested predictors of noncompliance framed by the obstacle hypothesis, dissonance theory, and psychological reactance. The results revealed four profiles of caregivers’ stewardship: one marked by compliance (Stewards) and three marked by types of noncompliance (Stockers, Persuaders, and Dissenters). The covariate analysis showed that, although psychological reactance predicted being noncompliant, it was types of obstacles and discrepant experiences that predicted caregivers’ patterns of noncompliance with antibiotic stewardship. Campaign planning often focuses on identifying the belief most associated with the targeted outcome, such as compliance. Noncompliance research, however, points out that persuaders may be successful to the extent to which they anticipate obstacles to compliance and address them in their influence attempts. A shift from medical noncompliance to patient engagement also affords an opportunity to consider how some recommendations create obstacles for others and to find positive ways to embrace conflicting needs, tensions, and reasons for refusal in order to promote collective goals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046899462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046899462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2018.1471109

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2018.1471109

M3 - Article

C2 - 29757101

AN - SCOPUS:85046899462

VL - 23

SP - 485

EP - 494

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - 5

ER -