Identifying collaborative care teams through electronic medical record utilization patterns

You Chen, Nancy M. Lorenzi, Warren S. Sandberg, Kelly Ambrosi Wolgast, Bradley A. Malin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this investigation was to determine whether automated approaches can learn patient-oriented care teams via utilization of an electronic medical record (EMR) system. Materials and Methods: To perform this investigation, we designed a data-mining framework that relies on a combination of latent topic modeling and network analysis to infer patterns of collaborative teams. We applied the framework to the EMR utilization records of over 10 000 employees and 17 000 inpatients at a large academic medical center during a 4-month window in 2010. Next, we conducted an extrinsic evaluation of the patterns to determine the plausibility of the inferred care teams via surveys with knowledgeable experts. Finally, we conducted an intrinsic evaluation to contextualize each team in terms of collaboration strength (via a cluster coefficient) and clinical credibility (via associations between teams and patient comorbidities). Results: The framework discovered 34 collaborative care teams, 27 (79.4%) of which were confirmed as administratively plausible. Of those, 26 teams depicted strong collaborations, with a cluster coefficient > 0.5. There were 119 diagnostic conditions associated with 34 care teams. Additionally, to provide clarity on how the survey respondents arrived at their determinations, we worked with several oncologists to develop an illustrative example of how a certain team functions in cancer care. Discussion: Inferred collaborative teams are plausible; translating such patterns into optimized collaborative care will require administrative review and integration with management practices. Conclusions: EMR utilization records can be mined for collaborative care patterns in large complex medical centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e111-e120
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume24
Issue numbere1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Patient Care Team
Data Mining
Practice Management
Comorbidity
Inpatients
Surveys and Questionnaires
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Chen, You ; Lorenzi, Nancy M. ; Sandberg, Warren S. ; Wolgast, Kelly Ambrosi ; Malin, Bradley A. / Identifying collaborative care teams through electronic medical record utilization patterns. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. e1. pp. e111-e120.
@article{380b3071dbce4e4b8a8223992b8cb8c1,
title = "Identifying collaborative care teams through electronic medical record utilization patterns",
abstract = "Objective: The goal of this investigation was to determine whether automated approaches can learn patient-oriented care teams via utilization of an electronic medical record (EMR) system. Materials and Methods: To perform this investigation, we designed a data-mining framework that relies on a combination of latent topic modeling and network analysis to infer patterns of collaborative teams. We applied the framework to the EMR utilization records of over 10 000 employees and 17 000 inpatients at a large academic medical center during a 4-month window in 2010. Next, we conducted an extrinsic evaluation of the patterns to determine the plausibility of the inferred care teams via surveys with knowledgeable experts. Finally, we conducted an intrinsic evaluation to contextualize each team in terms of collaboration strength (via a cluster coefficient) and clinical credibility (via associations between teams and patient comorbidities). Results: The framework discovered 34 collaborative care teams, 27 (79.4{\%}) of which were confirmed as administratively plausible. Of those, 26 teams depicted strong collaborations, with a cluster coefficient > 0.5. There were 119 diagnostic conditions associated with 34 care teams. Additionally, to provide clarity on how the survey respondents arrived at their determinations, we worked with several oncologists to develop an illustrative example of how a certain team functions in cancer care. Discussion: Inferred collaborative teams are plausible; translating such patterns into optimized collaborative care will require administrative review and integration with management practices. Conclusions: EMR utilization records can be mined for collaborative care patterns in large complex medical centers.",
author = "You Chen and Lorenzi, {Nancy M.} and Sandberg, {Warren S.} and Wolgast, {Kelly Ambrosi} and Malin, {Bradley A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocw124",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "e111--e120",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "e1",

}

Identifying collaborative care teams through electronic medical record utilization patterns. / Chen, You; Lorenzi, Nancy M.; Sandberg, Warren S.; Wolgast, Kelly Ambrosi; Malin, Bradley A.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 24, No. e1, 01.04.2017, p. e111-e120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying collaborative care teams through electronic medical record utilization patterns

AU - Chen, You

AU - Lorenzi, Nancy M.

AU - Sandberg, Warren S.

AU - Wolgast, Kelly Ambrosi

AU - Malin, Bradley A.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Objective: The goal of this investigation was to determine whether automated approaches can learn patient-oriented care teams via utilization of an electronic medical record (EMR) system. Materials and Methods: To perform this investigation, we designed a data-mining framework that relies on a combination of latent topic modeling and network analysis to infer patterns of collaborative teams. We applied the framework to the EMR utilization records of over 10 000 employees and 17 000 inpatients at a large academic medical center during a 4-month window in 2010. Next, we conducted an extrinsic evaluation of the patterns to determine the plausibility of the inferred care teams via surveys with knowledgeable experts. Finally, we conducted an intrinsic evaluation to contextualize each team in terms of collaboration strength (via a cluster coefficient) and clinical credibility (via associations between teams and patient comorbidities). Results: The framework discovered 34 collaborative care teams, 27 (79.4%) of which were confirmed as administratively plausible. Of those, 26 teams depicted strong collaborations, with a cluster coefficient > 0.5. There were 119 diagnostic conditions associated with 34 care teams. Additionally, to provide clarity on how the survey respondents arrived at their determinations, we worked with several oncologists to develop an illustrative example of how a certain team functions in cancer care. Discussion: Inferred collaborative teams are plausible; translating such patterns into optimized collaborative care will require administrative review and integration with management practices. Conclusions: EMR utilization records can be mined for collaborative care patterns in large complex medical centers.

AB - Objective: The goal of this investigation was to determine whether automated approaches can learn patient-oriented care teams via utilization of an electronic medical record (EMR) system. Materials and Methods: To perform this investigation, we designed a data-mining framework that relies on a combination of latent topic modeling and network analysis to infer patterns of collaborative teams. We applied the framework to the EMR utilization records of over 10 000 employees and 17 000 inpatients at a large academic medical center during a 4-month window in 2010. Next, we conducted an extrinsic evaluation of the patterns to determine the plausibility of the inferred care teams via surveys with knowledgeable experts. Finally, we conducted an intrinsic evaluation to contextualize each team in terms of collaboration strength (via a cluster coefficient) and clinical credibility (via associations between teams and patient comorbidities). Results: The framework discovered 34 collaborative care teams, 27 (79.4%) of which were confirmed as administratively plausible. Of those, 26 teams depicted strong collaborations, with a cluster coefficient > 0.5. There were 119 diagnostic conditions associated with 34 care teams. Additionally, to provide clarity on how the survey respondents arrived at their determinations, we worked with several oncologists to develop an illustrative example of how a certain team functions in cancer care. Discussion: Inferred collaborative teams are plausible; translating such patterns into optimized collaborative care will require administrative review and integration with management practices. Conclusions: EMR utilization records can be mined for collaborative care patterns in large complex medical centers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035796987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035796987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocw124

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocw124

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - e111-e120

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - e1

ER -