Ideology and discourse: Characterizations of the 1996 Farm Bill by agricultural interest groups

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between discourse and ideology can be described as that of process and effect [Purvis and Hunt (1993) British Journal of Sociology 44: 473-499]. Discourse, used within relations of domination, can result in the formation of ideology. To study this relationship systematically requires a methodology that contextualizes discourse within social relations and examines when such discourse becomes an ideology. I use Thompson's theory/methodology of "depth hermeneutics" to study documents produced by agricultural interest groups concerning the 1996 Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act and I assess the ideological status of the discourses contained in these documents. The findings suggest that the organizations representing the small-to-medium-sized farmers tended to use more agrarian themes, fewer market themes, and fewer linguistic strategies indicative of ideology. The organizations representing more concentrated, vertically-integrated interests and agribusinesses use fewer agrarian themes, more market themes, and more linguistic strategies. Therefore, market themes, not agrarian themes, form an ideology in this context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-253
Number of pages15
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Farm Bill
markets
sociology
agribusiness
farmers
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

@article{d3618602b40444b1b533e3078cedaf82,
title = "Ideology and discourse: Characterizations of the 1996 Farm Bill by agricultural interest groups",
abstract = "The relationship between discourse and ideology can be described as that of process and effect [Purvis and Hunt (1993) British Journal of Sociology 44: 473-499]. Discourse, used within relations of domination, can result in the formation of ideology. To study this relationship systematically requires a methodology that contextualizes discourse within social relations and examines when such discourse becomes an ideology. I use Thompson's theory/methodology of {"}depth hermeneutics{"} to study documents produced by agricultural interest groups concerning the 1996 Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act and I assess the ideological status of the discourses contained in these documents. The findings suggest that the organizations representing the small-to-medium-sized farmers tended to use more agrarian themes, fewer market themes, and fewer linguistic strategies indicative of ideology. The organizations representing more concentrated, vertically-integrated interests and agribusinesses use fewer agrarian themes, more market themes, and more linguistic strategies. Therefore, market themes, not agrarian themes, form an ideology in this context.",
author = "Brasier, {Kathryn Jo}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1019913920983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "239--253",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Ideology and discourse : Characterizations of the 1996 Farm Bill by agricultural interest groups. / Brasier, Kathryn Jo.

In: Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 239-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ideology and discourse

T2 - Characterizations of the 1996 Farm Bill by agricultural interest groups

AU - Brasier, Kathryn Jo

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The relationship between discourse and ideology can be described as that of process and effect [Purvis and Hunt (1993) British Journal of Sociology 44: 473-499]. Discourse, used within relations of domination, can result in the formation of ideology. To study this relationship systematically requires a methodology that contextualizes discourse within social relations and examines when such discourse becomes an ideology. I use Thompson's theory/methodology of "depth hermeneutics" to study documents produced by agricultural interest groups concerning the 1996 Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act and I assess the ideological status of the discourses contained in these documents. The findings suggest that the organizations representing the small-to-medium-sized farmers tended to use more agrarian themes, fewer market themes, and fewer linguistic strategies indicative of ideology. The organizations representing more concentrated, vertically-integrated interests and agribusinesses use fewer agrarian themes, more market themes, and more linguistic strategies. Therefore, market themes, not agrarian themes, form an ideology in this context.

AB - The relationship between discourse and ideology can be described as that of process and effect [Purvis and Hunt (1993) British Journal of Sociology 44: 473-499]. Discourse, used within relations of domination, can result in the formation of ideology. To study this relationship systematically requires a methodology that contextualizes discourse within social relations and examines when such discourse becomes an ideology. I use Thompson's theory/methodology of "depth hermeneutics" to study documents produced by agricultural interest groups concerning the 1996 Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act and I assess the ideological status of the discourses contained in these documents. The findings suggest that the organizations representing the small-to-medium-sized farmers tended to use more agrarian themes, fewer market themes, and fewer linguistic strategies indicative of ideology. The organizations representing more concentrated, vertically-integrated interests and agribusinesses use fewer agrarian themes, more market themes, and more linguistic strategies. Therefore, market themes, not agrarian themes, form an ideology in this context.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144448336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144448336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1019913920983

DO - 10.1023/A:1019913920983

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:27144448336

VL - 19

SP - 239

EP - 253

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 3

ER -