If they come, we will build it: In vitro meat and the discursive struggle over future agrofood expectations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to recent literature in the sociology of expectations, expectations about the future are "performative" in that they provide guidance for activities, attract attention, mobilize political and economic resources, coordinate between groups, link technical and social concerns, create visions, and enroll supporters. While this framework has blossomed over the past decade in science and technology studies, it has yet to be applied towards a more refined understanding of how the future of the modern agrofood system is being actively contested and understood. I seek to redress this gap by using the sociology of expectations to explain the discursive topography surrounding in vitro meat, a nascent agrofood technology whereby processed meat products are developed from stem cells as opposed to live animals. In discussing the obstacles and challenges which confront the proponents of this technology, I utilize three key concepts from the sociology of expectations: (1) hype, (2) retrospective prospects, and (3) the role of myth, metaphor, and ideology. I find that despite sluggish results and financial setbacks, the controversial legacy of previous agrofood technologies, and persistent cultural skepticism, the core ideological justifications for in vitro meat have proven to be resilient in buoying the technology through rough discursive waters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)511-523
Number of pages13
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

sociology
meat
economic resources
meat products
topography
stem cells
animals

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

@article{ec90722e587348e581cff1c28867623a,
title = "If they come, we will build it: In vitro meat and the discursive struggle over future agrofood expectations",
abstract = "According to recent literature in the sociology of expectations, expectations about the future are {"}performative{"} in that they provide guidance for activities, attract attention, mobilize political and economic resources, coordinate between groups, link technical and social concerns, create visions, and enroll supporters. While this framework has blossomed over the past decade in science and technology studies, it has yet to be applied towards a more refined understanding of how the future of the modern agrofood system is being actively contested and understood. I seek to redress this gap by using the sociology of expectations to explain the discursive topography surrounding in vitro meat, a nascent agrofood technology whereby processed meat products are developed from stem cells as opposed to live animals. In discussing the obstacles and challenges which confront the proponents of this technology, I utilize three key concepts from the sociology of expectations: (1) hype, (2) retrospective prospects, and (3) the role of myth, metaphor, and ideology. I find that despite sluggish results and financial setbacks, the controversial legacy of previous agrofood technologies, and persistent cultural skepticism, the core ideological justifications for in vitro meat have proven to be resilient in buoying the technology through rough discursive waters.",
author = "Chiles, {Robert Magneson}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10460-013-9427-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "511--523",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - If they come, we will build it

T2 - In vitro meat and the discursive struggle over future agrofood expectations

AU - Chiles, Robert Magneson

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - According to recent literature in the sociology of expectations, expectations about the future are "performative" in that they provide guidance for activities, attract attention, mobilize political and economic resources, coordinate between groups, link technical and social concerns, create visions, and enroll supporters. While this framework has blossomed over the past decade in science and technology studies, it has yet to be applied towards a more refined understanding of how the future of the modern agrofood system is being actively contested and understood. I seek to redress this gap by using the sociology of expectations to explain the discursive topography surrounding in vitro meat, a nascent agrofood technology whereby processed meat products are developed from stem cells as opposed to live animals. In discussing the obstacles and challenges which confront the proponents of this technology, I utilize three key concepts from the sociology of expectations: (1) hype, (2) retrospective prospects, and (3) the role of myth, metaphor, and ideology. I find that despite sluggish results and financial setbacks, the controversial legacy of previous agrofood technologies, and persistent cultural skepticism, the core ideological justifications for in vitro meat have proven to be resilient in buoying the technology through rough discursive waters.

AB - According to recent literature in the sociology of expectations, expectations about the future are "performative" in that they provide guidance for activities, attract attention, mobilize political and economic resources, coordinate between groups, link technical and social concerns, create visions, and enroll supporters. While this framework has blossomed over the past decade in science and technology studies, it has yet to be applied towards a more refined understanding of how the future of the modern agrofood system is being actively contested and understood. I seek to redress this gap by using the sociology of expectations to explain the discursive topography surrounding in vitro meat, a nascent agrofood technology whereby processed meat products are developed from stem cells as opposed to live animals. In discussing the obstacles and challenges which confront the proponents of this technology, I utilize three key concepts from the sociology of expectations: (1) hype, (2) retrospective prospects, and (3) the role of myth, metaphor, and ideology. I find that despite sluggish results and financial setbacks, the controversial legacy of previous agrofood technologies, and persistent cultural skepticism, the core ideological justifications for in vitro meat have proven to be resilient in buoying the technology through rough discursive waters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889608797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889608797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10460-013-9427-9

DO - 10.1007/s10460-013-9427-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84889608797

VL - 30

SP - 511

EP - 523

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 4

ER -