Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa vs. massive localized lymphedema

Jonelle Thomas, Eric Walker, Stephanie Bernard, Jennifer Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Adiposis dolorosa (Dercum’s disease) is a condition of benign, painful subcutaneous lipomatous lesions associated with weakness, endocrine and lipid abnormalities, and mental disturbances. There is little information documenting the cross-sectional imaging findings that differentiate it from lipomatous and neoplastic soft tissue masses, or massive localized lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to provide a radiological case series of adiposis dolorosa. Methods: A 10-year retrospective review of the picture archiving and communications system was performed. Two musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed images to confirm and document imaging features, location, size, and patient demographics. Medical records were reviewed to characterize patients into three groups: one group met at least three of the four criteria of Dercum’s syndrome, the second group met less than three criteria, and the third group had clinical diagnosis of cellulitis of the lower extremity. Results: Seventeen cases (25 masses) of adiposis dolorosa were found, nine cases of which met at least three criteria of Dercum’s syndrome. All cases in the first two groups demonstrated skin thickening and lymphedema of subcutaneous fat, which was fluid attenuation on CT and low or intermediate T1-weighted and high STIR/T2-weighted MR signal. Two cases with pathology showed mild fatty infiltration with fibrous septa, and the third case showed massive localized lymphedema. The third group of ten cellulitis patients demonstrated non-mass-like subcutaneous edema with similar CT attenuation and MR signal characteristics to the first two groups, but differed by the presence of post-contrast enhancement and non-mass-like appearance in 90 %. Conclusion: Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa and massive localized lymphedema overlap, as do the symptoms and pathological features. Due to the mass-like engorgement of the soft tissues and pain, patients will often undergo imaging to exclude neoplasm or infection. Knowledge of these conditions and the characteristic imaging findings is important to prevent unnecessary biopsy and misdiagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)839-847
Number of pages9
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Adiposis Dolorosa
Lymphedema
Cellulitis
Radiology Information Systems
Nociceptive Pain
Subcutaneous Fat
antineoplaston A10
Diagnostic Errors
Medical Records
Lower Extremity
Edema
Demography
Pathology
Lipids
Biopsy
Skin
Infection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Thomas, Jonelle ; Walker, Eric ; Bernard, Stephanie ; Bennett, Jennifer. / Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa vs. massive localized lymphedema. In: Skeletal Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 6. pp. 839-847.
@article{ec9b7aa6c6074462999a4939cb57358b,
title = "Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa vs. massive localized lymphedema",
abstract = "Purpose: Adiposis dolorosa (Dercum’s disease) is a condition of benign, painful subcutaneous lipomatous lesions associated with weakness, endocrine and lipid abnormalities, and mental disturbances. There is little information documenting the cross-sectional imaging findings that differentiate it from lipomatous and neoplastic soft tissue masses, or massive localized lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to provide a radiological case series of adiposis dolorosa. Methods: A 10-year retrospective review of the picture archiving and communications system was performed. Two musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed images to confirm and document imaging features, location, size, and patient demographics. Medical records were reviewed to characterize patients into three groups: one group met at least three of the four criteria of Dercum’s syndrome, the second group met less than three criteria, and the third group had clinical diagnosis of cellulitis of the lower extremity. Results: Seventeen cases (25 masses) of adiposis dolorosa were found, nine cases of which met at least three criteria of Dercum’s syndrome. All cases in the first two groups demonstrated skin thickening and lymphedema of subcutaneous fat, which was fluid attenuation on CT and low or intermediate T1-weighted and high STIR/T2-weighted MR signal. Two cases with pathology showed mild fatty infiltration with fibrous septa, and the third case showed massive localized lymphedema. The third group of ten cellulitis patients demonstrated non-mass-like subcutaneous edema with similar CT attenuation and MR signal characteristics to the first two groups, but differed by the presence of post-contrast enhancement and non-mass-like appearance in 90 {\%}. Conclusion: Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa and massive localized lymphedema overlap, as do the symptoms and pathological features. Due to the mass-like engorgement of the soft tissues and pain, patients will often undergo imaging to exclude neoplasm or infection. Knowledge of these conditions and the characteristic imaging findings is important to prevent unnecessary biopsy and misdiagnosis.",
author = "Jonelle Thomas and Eric Walker and Stephanie Bernard and Jennifer Bennett",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-015-2114-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "839--847",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa vs. massive localized lymphedema. / Thomas, Jonelle; Walker, Eric; Bernard, Stephanie; Bennett, Jennifer.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 44, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 839-847.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa vs. massive localized lymphedema

AU - Thomas, Jonelle

AU - Walker, Eric

AU - Bernard, Stephanie

AU - Bennett, Jennifer

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Purpose: Adiposis dolorosa (Dercum’s disease) is a condition of benign, painful subcutaneous lipomatous lesions associated with weakness, endocrine and lipid abnormalities, and mental disturbances. There is little information documenting the cross-sectional imaging findings that differentiate it from lipomatous and neoplastic soft tissue masses, or massive localized lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to provide a radiological case series of adiposis dolorosa. Methods: A 10-year retrospective review of the picture archiving and communications system was performed. Two musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed images to confirm and document imaging features, location, size, and patient demographics. Medical records were reviewed to characterize patients into three groups: one group met at least three of the four criteria of Dercum’s syndrome, the second group met less than three criteria, and the third group had clinical diagnosis of cellulitis of the lower extremity. Results: Seventeen cases (25 masses) of adiposis dolorosa were found, nine cases of which met at least three criteria of Dercum’s syndrome. All cases in the first two groups demonstrated skin thickening and lymphedema of subcutaneous fat, which was fluid attenuation on CT and low or intermediate T1-weighted and high STIR/T2-weighted MR signal. Two cases with pathology showed mild fatty infiltration with fibrous septa, and the third case showed massive localized lymphedema. The third group of ten cellulitis patients demonstrated non-mass-like subcutaneous edema with similar CT attenuation and MR signal characteristics to the first two groups, but differed by the presence of post-contrast enhancement and non-mass-like appearance in 90 %. Conclusion: Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa and massive localized lymphedema overlap, as do the symptoms and pathological features. Due to the mass-like engorgement of the soft tissues and pain, patients will often undergo imaging to exclude neoplasm or infection. Knowledge of these conditions and the characteristic imaging findings is important to prevent unnecessary biopsy and misdiagnosis.

AB - Purpose: Adiposis dolorosa (Dercum’s disease) is a condition of benign, painful subcutaneous lipomatous lesions associated with weakness, endocrine and lipid abnormalities, and mental disturbances. There is little information documenting the cross-sectional imaging findings that differentiate it from lipomatous and neoplastic soft tissue masses, or massive localized lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to provide a radiological case series of adiposis dolorosa. Methods: A 10-year retrospective review of the picture archiving and communications system was performed. Two musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed images to confirm and document imaging features, location, size, and patient demographics. Medical records were reviewed to characterize patients into three groups: one group met at least three of the four criteria of Dercum’s syndrome, the second group met less than three criteria, and the third group had clinical diagnosis of cellulitis of the lower extremity. Results: Seventeen cases (25 masses) of adiposis dolorosa were found, nine cases of which met at least three criteria of Dercum’s syndrome. All cases in the first two groups demonstrated skin thickening and lymphedema of subcutaneous fat, which was fluid attenuation on CT and low or intermediate T1-weighted and high STIR/T2-weighted MR signal. Two cases with pathology showed mild fatty infiltration with fibrous septa, and the third case showed massive localized lymphedema. The third group of ten cellulitis patients demonstrated non-mass-like subcutaneous edema with similar CT attenuation and MR signal characteristics to the first two groups, but differed by the presence of post-contrast enhancement and non-mass-like appearance in 90 %. Conclusion: Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa and massive localized lymphedema overlap, as do the symptoms and pathological features. Due to the mass-like engorgement of the soft tissues and pain, patients will often undergo imaging to exclude neoplasm or infection. Knowledge of these conditions and the characteristic imaging findings is important to prevent unnecessary biopsy and misdiagnosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939987267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939987267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-015-2114-8

DO - 10.1007/s00256-015-2114-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 25672948

AN - SCOPUS:84939987267

VL - 44

SP - 839

EP - 847

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 6

ER -