Imaging of current spinal hardware

Lumbar spine

Alice S. Ha, Jonelle Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The purposes of this article are to review the indications for and the materials and designs of hardware more commonly used in the lumbar spine; to discuss alternatives for each of the types of hardware; to review normal postoperative imaging findings; to describe the appropriateness of different imaging modalities for postoperative evaluation; and to show examples of hardware complications. Conclusion: Stabilization and fusion of the lumbar spine with intervertebral disk replacement, artificial ligaments, spinous process distraction devices, plate-and-rod systems, dynamic posterior fusion devices, and newer types of material incorporation are increasingly more common in contemporary surgical practice. These spinal hardware devices will be seen more often in radiology practice. Successful postoperative radiologic evaluation of this spinal hardware necessitates an understanding of fundamental hardware design, physiologic objectives, normal postoperative imaging appearances, and unique complications. Radiologists may have little training and experience with the new and modified types of hardware used in the lumbar spine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-581
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume203
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Spine
Equipment and Supplies
Intervertebral Disc
Ligaments
Radiology
Radiologists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{f16eb11b450346fcb7831fcff6612a9f,
title = "Imaging of current spinal hardware: Lumbar spine",
abstract = "Objective. The purposes of this article are to review the indications for and the materials and designs of hardware more commonly used in the lumbar spine; to discuss alternatives for each of the types of hardware; to review normal postoperative imaging findings; to describe the appropriateness of different imaging modalities for postoperative evaluation; and to show examples of hardware complications. Conclusion: Stabilization and fusion of the lumbar spine with intervertebral disk replacement, artificial ligaments, spinous process distraction devices, plate-and-rod systems, dynamic posterior fusion devices, and newer types of material incorporation are increasingly more common in contemporary surgical practice. These spinal hardware devices will be seen more often in radiology practice. Successful postoperative radiologic evaluation of this spinal hardware necessitates an understanding of fundamental hardware design, physiologic objectives, normal postoperative imaging appearances, and unique complications. Radiologists may have little training and experience with the new and modified types of hardware used in the lumbar spine.",
author = "Ha, {Alice S.} and Jonelle Thomas",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.13.12217",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
pages = "573--581",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "3",

}

Imaging of current spinal hardware : Lumbar spine. / Ha, Alice S.; Thomas, Jonelle.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 203, No. 3, 01.01.2014, p. 573-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging of current spinal hardware

T2 - Lumbar spine

AU - Ha, Alice S.

AU - Thomas, Jonelle

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objective. The purposes of this article are to review the indications for and the materials and designs of hardware more commonly used in the lumbar spine; to discuss alternatives for each of the types of hardware; to review normal postoperative imaging findings; to describe the appropriateness of different imaging modalities for postoperative evaluation; and to show examples of hardware complications. Conclusion: Stabilization and fusion of the lumbar spine with intervertebral disk replacement, artificial ligaments, spinous process distraction devices, plate-and-rod systems, dynamic posterior fusion devices, and newer types of material incorporation are increasingly more common in contemporary surgical practice. These spinal hardware devices will be seen more often in radiology practice. Successful postoperative radiologic evaluation of this spinal hardware necessitates an understanding of fundamental hardware design, physiologic objectives, normal postoperative imaging appearances, and unique complications. Radiologists may have little training and experience with the new and modified types of hardware used in the lumbar spine.

AB - Objective. The purposes of this article are to review the indications for and the materials and designs of hardware more commonly used in the lumbar spine; to discuss alternatives for each of the types of hardware; to review normal postoperative imaging findings; to describe the appropriateness of different imaging modalities for postoperative evaluation; and to show examples of hardware complications. Conclusion: Stabilization and fusion of the lumbar spine with intervertebral disk replacement, artificial ligaments, spinous process distraction devices, plate-and-rod systems, dynamic posterior fusion devices, and newer types of material incorporation are increasingly more common in contemporary surgical practice. These spinal hardware devices will be seen more often in radiology practice. Successful postoperative radiologic evaluation of this spinal hardware necessitates an understanding of fundamental hardware design, physiologic objectives, normal postoperative imaging appearances, and unique complications. Radiologists may have little training and experience with the new and modified types of hardware used in the lumbar spine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907863418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907863418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.13.12217

DO - 10.2214/AJR.13.12217

M3 - Review article

VL - 203

SP - 573

EP - 581

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 3

ER -