Imminent domain: Queer space in the built environment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the idea of queer space has provoked the interest of cultural theorists, political activists, and utopian dreamers, little attention has been paid to its visual aspect. This reflects, in part, the conservatism of the design professions, which have been slow to acknowledge issues of sexual identity. But it reflects, as well, an ontological problem: queer space may be a contradiction in terms. Some would argue that queerness, as an ineffable ideal of oppositional culture, is so fluid and contingent that the idea of a concrete queer space is an oxymoron. I prefer to define queerness historically as an identity, arising in the 1980s through the confluence of the relatively separate gay and lesbian movements of the previous decade, joining not just gays and lesbians, but all manner of sex/gender scofflaws under a simple in-your-face term. 1 As a historical phenomenon, its spatial signifiers can be charted and analyzed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-70
Number of pages7
JournalArt Journal
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Built Environment
Queerness
Lesbian
Ontological
Utopian
1980s
Contingent
Dreamer
Cultural Theorists
Oxymoron
Conservatism
Confluence
Sexual Identity
Design Profession
Political Activists
Ideal

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

@article{8815f5d17bf54c39bfbd72a5dc52ec0b,
title = "Imminent domain: Queer space in the built environment",
abstract = "Although the idea of queer space has provoked the interest of cultural theorists, political activists, and utopian dreamers, little attention has been paid to its visual aspect. This reflects, in part, the conservatism of the design professions, which have been slow to acknowledge issues of sexual identity. But it reflects, as well, an ontological problem: queer space may be a contradiction in terms. Some would argue that queerness, as an ineffable ideal of oppositional culture, is so fluid and contingent that the idea of a concrete queer space is an oxymoron. I prefer to define queerness historically as an identity, arising in the 1980s through the confluence of the relatively separate gay and lesbian movements of the previous decade, joining not just gays and lesbians, but all manner of sex/gender scofflaws under a simple in-your-face term. 1 As a historical phenomenon, its spatial signifiers can be charted and analyzed.",
author = "Reed, {Christopher Gervais}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00043249.1996.10791788",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "64--70",
journal = "Art Journal",
issn = "0004-3249",
publisher = "College Art Association",
number = "4",

}

Imminent domain : Queer space in the built environment. / Reed, Christopher Gervais.

In: Art Journal, Vol. 55, No. 4, 01.01.1996, p. 64-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imminent domain

T2 - Queer space in the built environment

AU - Reed, Christopher Gervais

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Although the idea of queer space has provoked the interest of cultural theorists, political activists, and utopian dreamers, little attention has been paid to its visual aspect. This reflects, in part, the conservatism of the design professions, which have been slow to acknowledge issues of sexual identity. But it reflects, as well, an ontological problem: queer space may be a contradiction in terms. Some would argue that queerness, as an ineffable ideal of oppositional culture, is so fluid and contingent that the idea of a concrete queer space is an oxymoron. I prefer to define queerness historically as an identity, arising in the 1980s through the confluence of the relatively separate gay and lesbian movements of the previous decade, joining not just gays and lesbians, but all manner of sex/gender scofflaws under a simple in-your-face term. 1 As a historical phenomenon, its spatial signifiers can be charted and analyzed.

AB - Although the idea of queer space has provoked the interest of cultural theorists, political activists, and utopian dreamers, little attention has been paid to its visual aspect. This reflects, in part, the conservatism of the design professions, which have been slow to acknowledge issues of sexual identity. But it reflects, as well, an ontological problem: queer space may be a contradiction in terms. Some would argue that queerness, as an ineffable ideal of oppositional culture, is so fluid and contingent that the idea of a concrete queer space is an oxymoron. I prefer to define queerness historically as an identity, arising in the 1980s through the confluence of the relatively separate gay and lesbian movements of the previous decade, joining not just gays and lesbians, but all manner of sex/gender scofflaws under a simple in-your-face term. 1 As a historical phenomenon, its spatial signifiers can be charted and analyzed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84909207902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84909207902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00043249.1996.10791788

DO - 10.1080/00043249.1996.10791788

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84909207902

VL - 55

SP - 64

EP - 70

JO - Art Journal

JF - Art Journal

SN - 0004-3249

IS - 4

ER -