Abstract
Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line). Results: Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73–1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81–1.27). Patients with mixed-histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed-histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06–2.59), respectively). Conclusion: Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed-histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed-histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 196-205 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | BJU International |
Volume | 128 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Urology
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma: a comparison of outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: BJU International, Vol. 128, No. 2, 08.2021, p. 196-205.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma
T2 - a comparison of outcomes
AU - Esagian, Stepan M.
AU - Khaki, Ali Raza
AU - Diamantopoulos, Leonidas N.
AU - Carril-Ajuria, Lucia
AU - Castellano, Daniel
AU - De Kouchkovsky, Ivan
AU - Park, Joseph J.
AU - Alva, Ajjai
AU - Bilen, Mehmet A.
AU - Stewart, Tyler F.
AU - McKay, Rana R.
AU - Santos, Victor S.
AU - Agarwal, Neeraj
AU - Jain, Jayanshu
AU - Zakharia, Yousef
AU - Morales-Barrera, Rafael
AU - Devitt, Michael E.
AU - Nelson, Ariel
AU - Hoimes, Christopher J.
AU - Shreck, Evan
AU - Gartrell, Benjamin A.
AU - Sankin, Alex
AU - Tripathi, Abhishek
AU - Zakopoulou, Roubini
AU - Bamias, Aristotelis
AU - Rodriguez-Vida, Alejo
AU - Drakaki, Alexandra
AU - Liu, Sandy
AU - Kumar, Vivek
AU - Lythgoe, Mark P.
AU - Pinato, David J.
AU - Murgic, Jure
AU - Fröbe, Ana
AU - Joshi, Monika
AU - Isaacsson Velho, Pedro
AU - Hahn, Noah
AU - Alonso Buznego, Lucia
AU - Duran, Ignacio
AU - Moses, Marcus
AU - Barata, Pedro
AU - Galsky, Matthew D.
AU - Sonpavde, Guru
AU - Yu, Evan Y.
AU - Msaouel, Pavlos
AU - Koshkin, Vadim S.
AU - Grivas, Petros
N1 - Funding Information: Ali Raza Khaki was supported by the National Cancer Institute under training grant T32CA009515. David J. Pinato is supported by grant funding from the Wellcome Trust Strategic Fund (PS3416). Research Electronic Data Capture at the Institute of Translational Health Sciences is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award UL1 TR002319. Evan Y. Yu and Petros Grivas acknowledge the support of the Seattle Translational Tumor Research Program at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Dr Diamantopoulos and Dr Grivas acknowledge the support of Kure It Cancer Research. David J. Pinato would like to acknowledge the infrastructure support provided by Imperial Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cancer Research UK Imperial Centre, the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Tissue Bank and the Imperial College BRC. Funding Information: Dr. Neeraj Agarwal has served in a consulting role for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Clovis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Janssen, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics; and has received institutional research funding from AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Calithera, Celldex, Clovis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunomedics, Janssen, Medivation, Merck, Nektar, New Link Genetics, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Rexahn, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Tracon. Dr. Ajjai Alva reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Onc Live, and research grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Merck, Prometheus, and Progenics. Dr. Aristotelis Bamias reports personal fees from Roche, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, and MSD. Dr. Pedro Barata has served as a consultant/advisor (to his institution) to Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Dendreon, Janssen Biotech, Caris, Clovis Oncology, Seattle Genetics, EMD Serono, and Bayer; and has received research funding (to his institution) from Blue Earth Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, and EMD Serono. Dr. Mehmet A. Bilen has served in an advisory board of Exelixis, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eisai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Genomic Health, Nektar, and Sanofi; and reports research grants from Xencor, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Seattle Genetics, Incyte, Nektar, AstraZeneca, Tricon Pharmaceuticals, Peleton Therapeutics, and Pfizer. Dr. Daniel Castellano has served in a consulting/advisory role for Janssen Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Ipsen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Bayer, Lilly, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has received travel accommodations from Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; and has received institutional research funding from Janssen Oncology. Dr. Michael E. Devitt has served in an advisor/speaker role for Bayer. Dr. Alexandra Drakaki has served in an advisory board of Genentech/Roche and Merck and in a consultant role in AstraZeneca. Dr. Ignacio Duran reports personal fees from Roche/Genentech, MSD, AstraZeneca, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Astellas, Seattle Genetics; and research grants from Roche/Genentech, and AstraZeneca. Dr. Matthew D. Galsky reports personal fees from Merck, Pfizer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics and research grants from Merck, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Genentech. Dr. Petros Grivas has served in a consulting role for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Driver, Dyania Health, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme, Heron Therapeutics, Immunomedics, Janssen, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, QED Therapeutics; has participated in an educational program by Bristol‐Myers Squibb; and has received institutional research funding from AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Bayer, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Debiopharm, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Immunomedics, Kure it Cancer Research, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Oncogenex, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics. Dr. Noah Hahn has served in a consulting role for Incyte, Genentech, Merck, Seattle Genetics, GlaxoSmithKline, Ferring, Champions Oncology, Health Advances, Keyquest Health, Guidepoint Global, TransMed, CicloMed, Janssen, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bladder Cancer Academy; and has received institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Incyte, Genentech, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Astex, Prinicipia Biopharma, Pieris, and Inovio. Dr. Christopher J. Hoimes has served in a consulting role and has received honoraria from Bristol‐Myers Squibb and Seattle Genetics. Dr. Monica Joshi has served in an advisory board for Sanofi; has received a research grant to Big ten cancer research consortium for a clinical trial from AstraZeneca, Pfizer and EMD Serono; and has received a free drug to her institution for a clinical study from Eisai. Dr. Vadim S. Koshkin has served in a consulting/advisory role for Janssen, AstraZeneca, Dendreon, Gerson Lehrman Group, Guidepoint Global, and Seattle Genetics/Astellas; has received travel accommodations from Janssen and AstraZeneca; and has received research grants from Clovis Oncology, Nektar, and Endocyte. Dr. Rana R. McKay has served in a consulting role for Dendreon and Vividion; has served in an advisory board for Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Tempus; and has received institutional research funding from Bayer, Pfizer, and Tempus. Dr. Rafael Morales‐Barrera has served in consulting role, advisory role, and/or speakers bureaus for Sanofi Aventis, Bayer, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Asofarma; and has received travel accommodations from Sanofi, Bayer, Janssen, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Roche, Astellas, Pharmacyclics, Clovis Oncology, and Lilly. Dr. Pavlos Msaouel has served in a consulting/advisory role for Mirati Therapeutics and Bristol‐Myers Squibb; has received honoraria from Mirati Therapeutics, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Exelixis; and institutional research funding from Mirati Therapeutics, Bristol‐Myers‐Squibb, and Takeda. Dr. David J. Pinato has received a grant from the Wellcome Trust Strategic Fund (PS3416); has received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare and Bayer Healthcare; has received travel accommodations from Bayer Healthcare and Bristol‐Myers Squibb, and consulting fees from Mina Therapeutics, Eisai, Roche, and AstraZeneca. Dr. Alejo Rodriguez‐Vida reports personal fees from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer and research grants from MSD, Pfizer, and Merck. Dr. Guru Sonpavde has received consultant fees from Genentech, Merck, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Janssen, Eisai, Bicycle Therapeutics, Dava oncology, and EMD Serono/Pfizer (all fees/year are compliant with his institution’s guidelines); has received institutional research support from Merck; has served in steering committees for AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, Bavarian Nordic, Debiopharm, QED; has received travel accommodations from Bristol‐Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca; has served as a member of data safety monitoring board of a trial funded by AstraZeneca; acted as a CME‐certified conference speaker for Physicians Education Resource and a conference speaker for Oncolive; acted as a speaker in a CME‐certified meeting by Research to Practice; acted as a speaker for a CME‐certified webcast by Medscape; served as an editor of an educational website by Elsevier Practice Update; and served as author of an educational chapter/review (fees/year comply with his institution’s guidelines). Dr. Tyler Stewart reports personal fees from Seattle Genetics. Dr. Abhishek Tripathi has served in an advisory role for Foundation medicine and Pfizer; and has received institutional research funding from EMD Serono, Aravive Inc., WindMil therapeutics, Clovis Oncology, and Corvus Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Yu reports personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis, Dendreon, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Sanofi, Abbvie, Incyte, QED, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and research grants from Bayer, Dendreon, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Taiho, and Blue Earth. Dr. Yousef Zakharia has served in an advisory Board for Amgen, Roche Diagnostics, Novartis, Janssen, Eisai, Exelixis, Castle Bioscience, Array, Bayer, Pfizer, Clovis, EMD Serono; has received institutional clinical trial support from NewLink Genetics, Pfizer, Exelixis, and Eisai; has served in a data safety monitoring committee for Janssen Research and Development; and has received consultant honoraria from Pfizer and Novartis. All other authors have no conflict of interest to report. Funding Information: Ali Raza Khaki was supported by the National Cancer Institute under training grant T32CA009515. David J. Pinato is supported by grant funding from the Wellcome Trust Strategic Fund (PS3416). Research Electronic Data Capture at the Institute of Translational Health Sciences is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award UL1 TR002319. Evan Y. Yu and Petros Grivas acknowledge the support of the Seattle Translational Tumor Research Program at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Dr Diamantopoulos and Dr Grivas acknowledge the support of Kure It Cancer Research. David J. Pinato would like to acknowledge the infrastructure support provided by Imperial Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cancer Research UK Imperial Centre, the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Tissue Bank and the Imperial College BRC. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors BJU International © 2021 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line). Results: Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73–1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81–1.27). Patients with mixed-histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed-histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06–2.59), respectively). Conclusion: Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed-histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed-histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.
AB - Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line). Results: Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73–1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81–1.27). Patients with mixed-histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed-histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06–2.59), respectively). Conclusion: Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed-histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed-histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100561925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100561925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bju.15324
DO - 10.1111/bju.15324
M3 - Article
C2 - 33556233
AN - SCOPUS:85100561925
SN - 1464-4096
VL - 128
SP - 196
EP - 205
JO - British Journal of Urology
JF - British Journal of Urology
IS - 2
ER -