Impact of adding artificially generated alert sound to hybrid electric vehicles on their detectability by pedestrians who are blind

Dae Shik Kim, Robert Wall Emerson, Koorosh Naghshineh, Jay Pliskow, Kyle R. Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A repeated-measures design with block randomization was used for the study, in which 14 adults with visual impairments attempted to detect three different vehicles: a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) with an artificially generated sound (Vehicle Sound for Pedestrians [VSP]), an HEV without the VSP, and a comparable internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. The VSP vehicle (mean +/- standard deviation [SD] = 38.3 +/- 14.8 m) was detected at a significantly farther distance than the HEV (mean +/- SD = 27.5 +/- 11.5 m), t = 4.823, p < 0.001, but no significant difference existed between the VSP and ICE vehicles (mean +/- SD = 34.5 +/- 14.3 m), t = 1.787, p = 0.10. Despite the overall sound level difference between the two test sites (parking lot = 48.7 dBA, roadway = 55.1 dBA), no significant difference in detection distance between the test sites was observed, F(1, 13) = 0.025, p = 0.88. No significant interaction was found between the vehicle type and test site, F(1.31, 16.98) = 0.272, p = 0.67. The findings of the study may help us understand how adding an artificially generated sound to an HEV could affect some of the orientation and mobility tasks performed by blind pedestrians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-394
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 11 2012

Fingerprint

Vision Disorders
Random Allocation
Pedestrians

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{63d6fceb0eae4ffc8b6ec7a731deb796,
title = "Impact of adding artificially generated alert sound to hybrid electric vehicles on their detectability by pedestrians who are blind",
abstract = "A repeated-measures design with block randomization was used for the study, in which 14 adults with visual impairments attempted to detect three different vehicles: a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) with an artificially generated sound (Vehicle Sound for Pedestrians [VSP]), an HEV without the VSP, and a comparable internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. The VSP vehicle (mean +/- standard deviation [SD] = 38.3 +/- 14.8 m) was detected at a significantly farther distance than the HEV (mean +/- SD = 27.5 +/- 11.5 m), t = 4.823, p < 0.001, but no significant difference existed between the VSP and ICE vehicles (mean +/- SD = 34.5 +/- 14.3 m), t = 1.787, p = 0.10. Despite the overall sound level difference between the two test sites (parking lot = 48.7 dBA, roadway = 55.1 dBA), no significant difference in detection distance between the test sites was observed, F(1, 13) = 0.025, p = 0.88. No significant interaction was found between the vehicle type and test site, F(1.31, 16.98) = 0.272, p = 0.67. The findings of the study may help us understand how adding an artificially generated sound to an HEV could affect some of the orientation and mobility tasks performed by blind pedestrians.",
author = "Kim, {Dae Shik} and Emerson, {Robert Wall} and Koorosh Naghshineh and Jay Pliskow and Myers, {Kyle R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "381--394",
journal = "Journal of rehabilitation R&D",
issn = "0748-7711",
publisher = "Rehabilitation Research and Development Service",
number = "3",

}

Impact of adding artificially generated alert sound to hybrid electric vehicles on their detectability by pedestrians who are blind. / Kim, Dae Shik; Emerson, Robert Wall; Naghshineh, Koorosh; Pliskow, Jay; Myers, Kyle R.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 49, No. 3, 11.12.2012, p. 381-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of adding artificially generated alert sound to hybrid electric vehicles on their detectability by pedestrians who are blind

AU - Kim, Dae Shik

AU - Emerson, Robert Wall

AU - Naghshineh, Koorosh

AU - Pliskow, Jay

AU - Myers, Kyle R.

PY - 2012/12/11

Y1 - 2012/12/11

N2 - A repeated-measures design with block randomization was used for the study, in which 14 adults with visual impairments attempted to detect three different vehicles: a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) with an artificially generated sound (Vehicle Sound for Pedestrians [VSP]), an HEV without the VSP, and a comparable internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. The VSP vehicle (mean +/- standard deviation [SD] = 38.3 +/- 14.8 m) was detected at a significantly farther distance than the HEV (mean +/- SD = 27.5 +/- 11.5 m), t = 4.823, p < 0.001, but no significant difference existed between the VSP and ICE vehicles (mean +/- SD = 34.5 +/- 14.3 m), t = 1.787, p = 0.10. Despite the overall sound level difference between the two test sites (parking lot = 48.7 dBA, roadway = 55.1 dBA), no significant difference in detection distance between the test sites was observed, F(1, 13) = 0.025, p = 0.88. No significant interaction was found between the vehicle type and test site, F(1.31, 16.98) = 0.272, p = 0.67. The findings of the study may help us understand how adding an artificially generated sound to an HEV could affect some of the orientation and mobility tasks performed by blind pedestrians.

AB - A repeated-measures design with block randomization was used for the study, in which 14 adults with visual impairments attempted to detect three different vehicles: a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) with an artificially generated sound (Vehicle Sound for Pedestrians [VSP]), an HEV without the VSP, and a comparable internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. The VSP vehicle (mean +/- standard deviation [SD] = 38.3 +/- 14.8 m) was detected at a significantly farther distance than the HEV (mean +/- SD = 27.5 +/- 11.5 m), t = 4.823, p < 0.001, but no significant difference existed between the VSP and ICE vehicles (mean +/- SD = 34.5 +/- 14.3 m), t = 1.787, p = 0.10. Despite the overall sound level difference between the two test sites (parking lot = 48.7 dBA, roadway = 55.1 dBA), no significant difference in detection distance between the test sites was observed, F(1, 13) = 0.025, p = 0.88. No significant interaction was found between the vehicle type and test site, F(1.31, 16.98) = 0.272, p = 0.67. The findings of the study may help us understand how adding an artificially generated sound to an HEV could affect some of the orientation and mobility tasks performed by blind pedestrians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861406223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861406223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0041

DO - 10.1682/JRRD.2011.03.0041

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 381

EP - 394

JO - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

JF - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

SN - 0748-7711

IS - 3

ER -