Impact of common assumptions on the accuracy of coal permeability models

Yan Peng, Jishan Liu, Hongyan Qu, Wancheng Zhu, Derek Elsworth

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

When CO2 is injected into coal seams, complex interactions of stress and chemistry have a strong influence on the properties of coal. These include influences on gas sorption and flow, coal deformation, porosity change and permeability modification. In this study, we define this chain of reactions as “coupled processes” implying that one physical process affects the initiation and progress of another. The individual process, in the absence of full consideration of cross couplings, forms the basis of very well-known disciplines such as elasticity, hydrology and heat transfer. Therefore, the inclusion of cross couplings is the key to rigorously formulate the full mechanics of CO2 sequestration in coal seams. Among those cross-couplings, the coal permeability model is one of the most important ones. A variety of permeability models were developed to address how CO2 can be injected into coal seams in a controlled and socially responsible manner. These models were derived normally under the condition of uniaxial strain and/or constant overburden stress. Our comprehensive review concluded that these models have so far failed to explain experimental results from controlled stress conditions, and only partially succeeded in explaining in situ data. We identified the absence of the effective stress transfer between matrix and fracture as the fundamental reason for these failures, and developed a rigorous approach to explicitly quantify this effect on permeability during CO2 sequestration. We applied this approach to generate a series of permeability type curves under the full spectrum of boundary conditions spanning prescribed stresses through constrained displacement. We benchmarked the solutions generated by using the “industry-standard” permeability models against our “exact” solutions for the full spectrum of boundary conditions, and concluded that these “industry-standard” models could produce unacceptable errors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages993-999
Number of pages7
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Event7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMS 2012 - Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Duration: Oct 15 2012Oct 19 2012

Other

Other7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMS 2012
CountryKorea, Republic of
CitySeoul
Period10/15/1210/19/12

Fingerprint

Coal
coal
permeability
cross coupling
coal seam
carbon sequestration
boundary condition
industries
Boundary conditions
boundary conditions
hydrology
axial strain
Hydrology
industry
effective stress
overburden
sorption
mechanics
elasticity
heat transfer

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Peng, Y., Liu, J., Qu, H., Zhu, W., & Elsworth, D. (2012). Impact of common assumptions on the accuracy of coal permeability models. 993-999. Paper presented at 7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMS 2012, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
Peng, Yan ; Liu, Jishan ; Qu, Hongyan ; Zhu, Wancheng ; Elsworth, Derek. / Impact of common assumptions on the accuracy of coal permeability models. Paper presented at 7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMS 2012, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.7 p.
@conference{fe7d652a9a6c4fd692f07a2405de8f3d,
title = "Impact of common assumptions on the accuracy of coal permeability models",
abstract = "When CO2 is injected into coal seams, complex interactions of stress and chemistry have a strong influence on the properties of coal. These include influences on gas sorption and flow, coal deformation, porosity change and permeability modification. In this study, we define this chain of reactions as “coupled processes” implying that one physical process affects the initiation and progress of another. The individual process, in the absence of full consideration of cross couplings, forms the basis of very well-known disciplines such as elasticity, hydrology and heat transfer. Therefore, the inclusion of cross couplings is the key to rigorously formulate the full mechanics of CO2 sequestration in coal seams. Among those cross-couplings, the coal permeability model is one of the most important ones. A variety of permeability models were developed to address how CO2 can be injected into coal seams in a controlled and socially responsible manner. These models were derived normally under the condition of uniaxial strain and/or constant overburden stress. Our comprehensive review concluded that these models have so far failed to explain experimental results from controlled stress conditions, and only partially succeeded in explaining in situ data. We identified the absence of the effective stress transfer between matrix and fracture as the fundamental reason for these failures, and developed a rigorous approach to explicitly quantify this effect on permeability during CO2 sequestration. We applied this approach to generate a series of permeability type curves under the full spectrum of boundary conditions spanning prescribed stresses through constrained displacement. We benchmarked the solutions generated by using the “industry-standard” permeability models against our “exact” solutions for the full spectrum of boundary conditions, and concluded that these “industry-standard” models could produce unacceptable errors.",
author = "Yan Peng and Jishan Liu and Hongyan Qu and Wancheng Zhu and Derek Elsworth",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "993--999",
note = "7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMS 2012 ; Conference date: 15-10-2012 Through 19-10-2012",

}

Peng, Y, Liu, J, Qu, H, Zhu, W & Elsworth, D 2012, 'Impact of common assumptions on the accuracy of coal permeability models' Paper presented at 7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMS 2012, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 10/15/12 - 10/19/12, pp. 993-999.

Impact of common assumptions on the accuracy of coal permeability models. / Peng, Yan; Liu, Jishan; Qu, Hongyan; Zhu, Wancheng; Elsworth, Derek.

2012. 993-999 Paper presented at 7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMS 2012, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Impact of common assumptions on the accuracy of coal permeability models

AU - Peng, Yan

AU - Liu, Jishan

AU - Qu, Hongyan

AU - Zhu, Wancheng

AU - Elsworth, Derek

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - When CO2 is injected into coal seams, complex interactions of stress and chemistry have a strong influence on the properties of coal. These include influences on gas sorption and flow, coal deformation, porosity change and permeability modification. In this study, we define this chain of reactions as “coupled processes” implying that one physical process affects the initiation and progress of another. The individual process, in the absence of full consideration of cross couplings, forms the basis of very well-known disciplines such as elasticity, hydrology and heat transfer. Therefore, the inclusion of cross couplings is the key to rigorously formulate the full mechanics of CO2 sequestration in coal seams. Among those cross-couplings, the coal permeability model is one of the most important ones. A variety of permeability models were developed to address how CO2 can be injected into coal seams in a controlled and socially responsible manner. These models were derived normally under the condition of uniaxial strain and/or constant overburden stress. Our comprehensive review concluded that these models have so far failed to explain experimental results from controlled stress conditions, and only partially succeeded in explaining in situ data. We identified the absence of the effective stress transfer between matrix and fracture as the fundamental reason for these failures, and developed a rigorous approach to explicitly quantify this effect on permeability during CO2 sequestration. We applied this approach to generate a series of permeability type curves under the full spectrum of boundary conditions spanning prescribed stresses through constrained displacement. We benchmarked the solutions generated by using the “industry-standard” permeability models against our “exact” solutions for the full spectrum of boundary conditions, and concluded that these “industry-standard” models could produce unacceptable errors.

AB - When CO2 is injected into coal seams, complex interactions of stress and chemistry have a strong influence on the properties of coal. These include influences on gas sorption and flow, coal deformation, porosity change and permeability modification. In this study, we define this chain of reactions as “coupled processes” implying that one physical process affects the initiation and progress of another. The individual process, in the absence of full consideration of cross couplings, forms the basis of very well-known disciplines such as elasticity, hydrology and heat transfer. Therefore, the inclusion of cross couplings is the key to rigorously formulate the full mechanics of CO2 sequestration in coal seams. Among those cross-couplings, the coal permeability model is one of the most important ones. A variety of permeability models were developed to address how CO2 can be injected into coal seams in a controlled and socially responsible manner. These models were derived normally under the condition of uniaxial strain and/or constant overburden stress. Our comprehensive review concluded that these models have so far failed to explain experimental results from controlled stress conditions, and only partially succeeded in explaining in situ data. We identified the absence of the effective stress transfer between matrix and fracture as the fundamental reason for these failures, and developed a rigorous approach to explicitly quantify this effect on permeability during CO2 sequestration. We applied this approach to generate a series of permeability type curves under the full spectrum of boundary conditions spanning prescribed stresses through constrained displacement. We benchmarked the solutions generated by using the “industry-standard” permeability models against our “exact” solutions for the full spectrum of boundary conditions, and concluded that these “industry-standard” models could produce unacceptable errors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056219248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056219248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

SP - 993

EP - 999

ER -

Peng Y, Liu J, Qu H, Zhu W, Elsworth D. Impact of common assumptions on the accuracy of coal permeability models. 2012. Paper presented at 7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMS 2012, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.