Impact of compound and reduced specification on valuation of projects with multiple risks

Saurabh Bansal, Yaroslav Rosokha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Several firms make business decisions based on risk specifications or estimates provided by domain experts. But research on whether the format of risk specifications systematically affects decision making in multidimensional environments is scarce. Using laboratory experiments, we show that subjective valuations of projects with multiple risks are highly sensitive to the format of risk specification. In the experiments, participants considered a project that had two risks and would be considered a success when favorable outcomes occurred on both risks. Participants were provided with the probabilities of success for each risk in two different specifications. In the reduced specification, each probability was directly specified. In the compound specification, each probability was specified as a two-point distribution. The data showed that under the reduced specification, decision-makers' perceived value of the project was higher than its true value, because of conjunctive probability bias in which decision makers overestimated the conjunctive probabilities. Under compound specification, however, judgmental valuations were subject to two biases that acted in opposite directions and, as a net outcome, managerial valuations were closer to risk-neutral valuations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-46
Number of pages20
JournalDecision Analysis
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Multiple risks
Decision maker
Risk-neutral valuation
Laboratory experiments
Perceived value
Decision making
Experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Decision Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{bac3bb8260b145e9a6117360f0a17bd9,
title = "Impact of compound and reduced specification on valuation of projects with multiple risks",
abstract = "Several firms make business decisions based on risk specifications or estimates provided by domain experts. But research on whether the format of risk specifications systematically affects decision making in multidimensional environments is scarce. Using laboratory experiments, we show that subjective valuations of projects with multiple risks are highly sensitive to the format of risk specification. In the experiments, participants considered a project that had two risks and would be considered a success when favorable outcomes occurred on both risks. Participants were provided with the probabilities of success for each risk in two different specifications. In the reduced specification, each probability was directly specified. In the compound specification, each probability was specified as a two-point distribution. The data showed that under the reduced specification, decision-makers' perceived value of the project was higher than its true value, because of conjunctive probability bias in which decision makers overestimated the conjunctive probabilities. Under compound specification, however, judgmental valuations were subject to two biases that acted in opposite directions and, as a net outcome, managerial valuations were closer to risk-neutral valuations.",
author = "Saurabh Bansal and Yaroslav Rosokha",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/deca.2017.0358",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "27--46",
journal = "Decision Analysis",
issn = "1545-8490",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "1",

}

Impact of compound and reduced specification on valuation of projects with multiple risks. / Bansal, Saurabh; Rosokha, Yaroslav.

In: Decision Analysis, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 27-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of compound and reduced specification on valuation of projects with multiple risks

AU - Bansal, Saurabh

AU - Rosokha, Yaroslav

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Several firms make business decisions based on risk specifications or estimates provided by domain experts. But research on whether the format of risk specifications systematically affects decision making in multidimensional environments is scarce. Using laboratory experiments, we show that subjective valuations of projects with multiple risks are highly sensitive to the format of risk specification. In the experiments, participants considered a project that had two risks and would be considered a success when favorable outcomes occurred on both risks. Participants were provided with the probabilities of success for each risk in two different specifications. In the reduced specification, each probability was directly specified. In the compound specification, each probability was specified as a two-point distribution. The data showed that under the reduced specification, decision-makers' perceived value of the project was higher than its true value, because of conjunctive probability bias in which decision makers overestimated the conjunctive probabilities. Under compound specification, however, judgmental valuations were subject to two biases that acted in opposite directions and, as a net outcome, managerial valuations were closer to risk-neutral valuations.

AB - Several firms make business decisions based on risk specifications or estimates provided by domain experts. But research on whether the format of risk specifications systematically affects decision making in multidimensional environments is scarce. Using laboratory experiments, we show that subjective valuations of projects with multiple risks are highly sensitive to the format of risk specification. In the experiments, participants considered a project that had two risks and would be considered a success when favorable outcomes occurred on both risks. Participants were provided with the probabilities of success for each risk in two different specifications. In the reduced specification, each probability was directly specified. In the compound specification, each probability was specified as a two-point distribution. The data showed that under the reduced specification, decision-makers' perceived value of the project was higher than its true value, because of conjunctive probability bias in which decision makers overestimated the conjunctive probabilities. Under compound specification, however, judgmental valuations were subject to two biases that acted in opposite directions and, as a net outcome, managerial valuations were closer to risk-neutral valuations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044174301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044174301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/deca.2017.0358

DO - 10.1287/deca.2017.0358

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044174301

VL - 15

SP - 27

EP - 46

JO - Decision Analysis

JF - Decision Analysis

SN - 1545-8490

IS - 1

ER -