Impact of production risk on the selection of peach rootstocks

Jayson K. Harper, George M. Greene

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nine peach rootstocks used in a nine-year experiment conducted at Biglerville, PA were evaluated based on their acceptability to generalized classes of fruit growers with different attitudes towards production risk. Tree mortality and its effect on orchard yield had a major impact on the economic performance of the rootstocks evaluated. In terms of average net returns, Halford, own-rooted 'Redhaven,' Bailey, and Lovell appeared to be good rootstock choices. However, in most cases, net return variability increased as average net returns increased. Using stochastic dominance with respect to a function techniques, Halford, own-rooted 'Redhaven,' and Bailey were ranked consistently in the top three across all risk preference intervals. Replacement of trees did not have a major impact on the preference ranking of a rootstock. The rootstocks Amandier, St. Julien, Damas, Siberian C, and 'Citation' performed very poorly compared to the other rootstocks in the trial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-46
Number of pages6
JournalFruit Varieties Journal
Volume52
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

peaches
rootstocks
economic performance
tree mortality
growers
orchards
fruits

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Horticulture

Cite this

@article{51adea7081c747a8930b8bd96b438e12,
title = "Impact of production risk on the selection of peach rootstocks",
abstract = "Nine peach rootstocks used in a nine-year experiment conducted at Biglerville, PA were evaluated based on their acceptability to generalized classes of fruit growers with different attitudes towards production risk. Tree mortality and its effect on orchard yield had a major impact on the economic performance of the rootstocks evaluated. In terms of average net returns, Halford, own-rooted 'Redhaven,' Bailey, and Lovell appeared to be good rootstock choices. However, in most cases, net return variability increased as average net returns increased. Using stochastic dominance with respect to a function techniques, Halford, own-rooted 'Redhaven,' and Bailey were ranked consistently in the top three across all risk preference intervals. Replacement of trees did not have a major impact on the preference ranking of a rootstock. The rootstocks Amandier, St. Julien, Damas, Siberian C, and 'Citation' performed very poorly compared to the other rootstocks in the trial.",
author = "Harper, {Jayson K.} and Greene, {George M.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "41--46",
journal = "Journal of the American Pomological Society",
issn = "1527-3741",
publisher = "American Pomological Society",
number = "1",

}

Impact of production risk on the selection of peach rootstocks. / Harper, Jayson K.; Greene, George M.

In: Fruit Varieties Journal, Vol. 52, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 41-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of production risk on the selection of peach rootstocks

AU - Harper, Jayson K.

AU - Greene, George M.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Nine peach rootstocks used in a nine-year experiment conducted at Biglerville, PA were evaluated based on their acceptability to generalized classes of fruit growers with different attitudes towards production risk. Tree mortality and its effect on orchard yield had a major impact on the economic performance of the rootstocks evaluated. In terms of average net returns, Halford, own-rooted 'Redhaven,' Bailey, and Lovell appeared to be good rootstock choices. However, in most cases, net return variability increased as average net returns increased. Using stochastic dominance with respect to a function techniques, Halford, own-rooted 'Redhaven,' and Bailey were ranked consistently in the top three across all risk preference intervals. Replacement of trees did not have a major impact on the preference ranking of a rootstock. The rootstocks Amandier, St. Julien, Damas, Siberian C, and 'Citation' performed very poorly compared to the other rootstocks in the trial.

AB - Nine peach rootstocks used in a nine-year experiment conducted at Biglerville, PA were evaluated based on their acceptability to generalized classes of fruit growers with different attitudes towards production risk. Tree mortality and its effect on orchard yield had a major impact on the economic performance of the rootstocks evaluated. In terms of average net returns, Halford, own-rooted 'Redhaven,' Bailey, and Lovell appeared to be good rootstock choices. However, in most cases, net return variability increased as average net returns increased. Using stochastic dominance with respect to a function techniques, Halford, own-rooted 'Redhaven,' and Bailey were ranked consistently in the top three across all risk preference intervals. Replacement of trees did not have a major impact on the preference ranking of a rootstock. The rootstocks Amandier, St. Julien, Damas, Siberian C, and 'Citation' performed very poorly compared to the other rootstocks in the trial.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031911124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031911124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031911124

VL - 52

SP - 41

EP - 46

JO - Journal of the American Pomological Society

JF - Journal of the American Pomological Society

SN - 1527-3741

IS - 1

ER -