TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Remote Instructional Format on Student Perception of a Supportive Learning Environment for Expertise Development
AU - Gayah, Vikash
AU - Zappe, Sarah E.
AU - Cutler, Stephanie
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Gayah currently serves as an editorial advisory board member of Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, an editorial board editor of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, an associate editor for the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (an international peer-reviewed journal), a handling editor for the Transportation Research Record and is a member of the Transportation Research Board’s Committee on Traffic Flow Theory and Characteristics (AHB 45), where he serves as a paper review coordinator. He has been recognized with multiple awards for his research and teaching activities, including the Dwight D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship, Gordon F. Newell Award for Excellence in Transportation Science, University of California Transportation Center Student of the Year Award, New Faculty Award by the Council of University Transportation Centers, the Cunard, Fred Burggraf and D. Grant Mickle outstanding paper awards by the Transportation Research Board, Harry West Teaching Award by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Penn State, Outstanding Teaching Award by the Penn State Engineering Alumni Society, and Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award by the National Science Foundation.
Funding Information:
Dr. Vikash V. Gayah is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University (joined 2012). He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Central Florida (2005 and 2006, respectively) and his Ph.D. degree from the University of California, Berkeley (2012). Dr. Gayah’s research focuses on urban mobility, traffic operations, traffic flow theory, traffic safety and public transportation. His research approach includes a combination of analytical models, micro-simulations and empirical analysis of transportation data. He has authored over 50 peer-reviewed journal articles, over 50 refereed conference proceedings, and numerous research reports to sponsors. He has worked on research contracts valued at more than $5 million, sponsored by the Pennsylvania, Washington State, Montana and South Dakota Departments of Transportation, US Department of Transportation (via the Mineta National Transit Research Consortium and the Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center), Federal Highway Administration, National Cooperative Highway Research Program and National Science Foundation.
Funding Information:
This research was supported by NSF Grant CMMI-1749200.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2021
PY - 2021/7/26
Y1 - 2021/7/26
N2 - The purpose of this research study was to examine the impact of the transition to remote learning in a senior-level elective class in transportation engineering with lecture and laboratory components at the Pennsylvania State University. Specifically, the study seeks to determine how the transition to remote instruction impacted student perceptions of the learning environment as it relates to the development of their professional expertise. Students' perception on the learning environment was measured using the Supportive Learning Environment for Expertise Development Questionnaire (SLEED-Q) [1]. The SLEED-Q was administered to students in Fall 2018 and Fall 2019 (normal instruction) and compared with responses obtained from Fall 2020 (remote instruction). Prior data (2018, 2019) was collected for baseline comparison as part of a larger curricular revision project to examine the impact of inquiry-based learning activities intended to be implemented in 2020. However, these activities were not implemented as planned due to the COVID pandemic. Instead, the course was taught using normal methods and techniques, except for the transition to a hybrid format. Lectures were performed synchronously online, while field-based laboratory activities that were intended to reinforce the concepts taught in the lecture were performed in-person. Due to social distancing regulations, instructions on the laboratory activities were provided virtually (instead of in-person in prior semesters) and immediate assistance was only available through phone calls or video conferencing. The results suggest that the remote instruction approach was able to maintain the same supportive environment as normal, in-person instruction and perhaps even provide a more supportive environment in some respects. These results demonstrate that there could be some positive features of remote instruction that could be integrated into normal, in-person instruction to support the development of professional expertise.
AB - The purpose of this research study was to examine the impact of the transition to remote learning in a senior-level elective class in transportation engineering with lecture and laboratory components at the Pennsylvania State University. Specifically, the study seeks to determine how the transition to remote instruction impacted student perceptions of the learning environment as it relates to the development of their professional expertise. Students' perception on the learning environment was measured using the Supportive Learning Environment for Expertise Development Questionnaire (SLEED-Q) [1]. The SLEED-Q was administered to students in Fall 2018 and Fall 2019 (normal instruction) and compared with responses obtained from Fall 2020 (remote instruction). Prior data (2018, 2019) was collected for baseline comparison as part of a larger curricular revision project to examine the impact of inquiry-based learning activities intended to be implemented in 2020. However, these activities were not implemented as planned due to the COVID pandemic. Instead, the course was taught using normal methods and techniques, except for the transition to a hybrid format. Lectures were performed synchronously online, while field-based laboratory activities that were intended to reinforce the concepts taught in the lecture were performed in-person. Due to social distancing regulations, instructions on the laboratory activities were provided virtually (instead of in-person in prior semesters) and immediate assistance was only available through phone calls or video conferencing. The results suggest that the remote instruction approach was able to maintain the same supportive environment as normal, in-person instruction and perhaps even provide a more supportive environment in some respects. These results demonstrate that there could be some positive features of remote instruction that could be integrated into normal, in-person instruction to support the development of professional expertise.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124550080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124550080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85124550080
SN - 2153-5965
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
T2 - 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2021
Y2 - 26 July 2021 through 29 July 2021
ER -