Impact of sign orientation on on-premise commercial signs

Abdulilah Z. Zineddin, Philip M. Garvey, Martin T. Pietrucha

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Storefront signs are often the end point of the information system travelers use to navigate the street and highway system to arrive at commercial destinations. To test the supposition that larger parallel signs would be as visible as smaller perpendicular signs, a variety of on-premise signs were tested under real-world conditions to determine their detectability and legibility. Using an open-field research design conducted on public roadways in a small downtown area and along a commercial strip development zone, 120 older and younger subjects viewed signs during both day and night conditions, with particular attention paid to sign orientation, operationally defined as parallel (i.e., being parallel to the roadway) versus perpendicular (i.e., being perpendicular to or facing oncoming traffic). Sign orientation was investigated by comparing perpendicular signs to parallel signs that were two and three times larger than the perpendicular signs with proportional increases in copy size. Contrary to most sign codes, the results indicate that perpendicular signs are significantly more detectible and legible than are larger parallel signs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-17
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Transportation Engineering
Volume131
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Highway systems
Information systems
development zone
city center
field research
research planning
information system

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

Zineddin, Abdulilah Z. ; Garvey, Philip M. ; Pietrucha, Martin T. / Impact of sign orientation on on-premise commercial signs. In: Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2005 ; Vol. 131, No. 1. pp. 11-17.
@article{04f6884bc0934b499da88dd86e85b4c9,
title = "Impact of sign orientation on on-premise commercial signs",
abstract = "Storefront signs are often the end point of the information system travelers use to navigate the street and highway system to arrive at commercial destinations. To test the supposition that larger parallel signs would be as visible as smaller perpendicular signs, a variety of on-premise signs were tested under real-world conditions to determine their detectability and legibility. Using an open-field research design conducted on public roadways in a small downtown area and along a commercial strip development zone, 120 older and younger subjects viewed signs during both day and night conditions, with particular attention paid to sign orientation, operationally defined as parallel (i.e., being parallel to the roadway) versus perpendicular (i.e., being perpendicular to or facing oncoming traffic). Sign orientation was investigated by comparing perpendicular signs to parallel signs that were two and three times larger than the perpendicular signs with proportional increases in copy size. Contrary to most sign codes, the results indicate that perpendicular signs are significantly more detectible and legible than are larger parallel signs.",
author = "Zineddin, {Abdulilah Z.} and Garvey, {Philip M.} and Pietrucha, {Martin T.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:1(11)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "11--17",
journal = "Transportation engineering journal of ASCE",
issn = "0733-947X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

Impact of sign orientation on on-premise commercial signs. / Zineddin, Abdulilah Z.; Garvey, Philip M.; Pietrucha, Martin T.

In: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 11-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of sign orientation on on-premise commercial signs

AU - Zineddin, Abdulilah Z.

AU - Garvey, Philip M.

AU - Pietrucha, Martin T.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Storefront signs are often the end point of the information system travelers use to navigate the street and highway system to arrive at commercial destinations. To test the supposition that larger parallel signs would be as visible as smaller perpendicular signs, a variety of on-premise signs were tested under real-world conditions to determine their detectability and legibility. Using an open-field research design conducted on public roadways in a small downtown area and along a commercial strip development zone, 120 older and younger subjects viewed signs during both day and night conditions, with particular attention paid to sign orientation, operationally defined as parallel (i.e., being parallel to the roadway) versus perpendicular (i.e., being perpendicular to or facing oncoming traffic). Sign orientation was investigated by comparing perpendicular signs to parallel signs that were two and three times larger than the perpendicular signs with proportional increases in copy size. Contrary to most sign codes, the results indicate that perpendicular signs are significantly more detectible and legible than are larger parallel signs.

AB - Storefront signs are often the end point of the information system travelers use to navigate the street and highway system to arrive at commercial destinations. To test the supposition that larger parallel signs would be as visible as smaller perpendicular signs, a variety of on-premise signs were tested under real-world conditions to determine their detectability and legibility. Using an open-field research design conducted on public roadways in a small downtown area and along a commercial strip development zone, 120 older and younger subjects viewed signs during both day and night conditions, with particular attention paid to sign orientation, operationally defined as parallel (i.e., being parallel to the roadway) versus perpendicular (i.e., being perpendicular to or facing oncoming traffic). Sign orientation was investigated by comparing perpendicular signs to parallel signs that were two and three times larger than the perpendicular signs with proportional increases in copy size. Contrary to most sign codes, the results indicate that perpendicular signs are significantly more detectible and legible than are larger parallel signs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11944250197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11944250197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:1(11)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:1(11)

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:11944250197

VL - 131

SP - 11

EP - 17

JO - Transportation engineering journal of ASCE

JF - Transportation engineering journal of ASCE

SN - 0733-947X

IS - 1

ER -