TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of WELL certification on occupant satisfaction and perceived health, well-being, and productivity
T2 - A multi-office pre- versus post-occupancy evaluation
AU - Ildiri, Nasim
AU - Bazille, Heather
AU - Lou, Yingli
AU - Hinkelman, Kathryn
AU - Gray, Whitney A.
AU - Zuo, Wangda
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Whitney Austin Gray reports financial support was provided by Delos Living LLC. Whitney Austin Gray reports a relationship with International WELL Building Institute pbc that includes: employment. Heather Bazille reports a relationship with International WELL Building Institute pbc that includes: employment.
Funding Information:
This research was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Awards No. IIS- 1802017 . This project was also partially supported by Delos Living LLC. The authors would like to thank the six companies for their willingness to participate in the research and for facilitating administration of the surveys. In addition, we would like to acknowledge the three anonymous Building and Environment reviewers for their constructive feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - The WELL Building Standard (WELL) is currently one of the most comprehensive building certification programs that aim to enhance the health and well-being of building occupants. However, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of WELL in achieving its goal. This study investigates the impact of WELL certification on occupant satisfaction with the workplace and occupant perceived health, well-being, and productivity. More than 1300 pre- and post-occupancy survey responses provided by the nearly same cohort of occupants from six companies in North America were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that transitioning to WELL certified offices from non-WELL certified offices had a positive impact on occupant satisfaction with the workplace and occupant perceived health, well-being, and productivity, with increases in means from pre-to post-occupancy being highly statistically significant. The majority of the studied occupant satisfaction parameters as well as occupant perceived mental health had large effect sizes. While they improved from pre-to post-occupancy, the analysis revealed small effect sizes for occupant perceived physical health and self-assessed productivity. The majority of the effect sizes for the perceived well-being parameters were large and medium. In addition to analyzing the survey responses in aggregate, the responses were examined at the individual company level to confirm the by-company and aggregate findings aligned.
AB - The WELL Building Standard (WELL) is currently one of the most comprehensive building certification programs that aim to enhance the health and well-being of building occupants. However, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of WELL in achieving its goal. This study investigates the impact of WELL certification on occupant satisfaction with the workplace and occupant perceived health, well-being, and productivity. More than 1300 pre- and post-occupancy survey responses provided by the nearly same cohort of occupants from six companies in North America were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that transitioning to WELL certified offices from non-WELL certified offices had a positive impact on occupant satisfaction with the workplace and occupant perceived health, well-being, and productivity, with increases in means from pre-to post-occupancy being highly statistically significant. The majority of the studied occupant satisfaction parameters as well as occupant perceived mental health had large effect sizes. While they improved from pre-to post-occupancy, the analysis revealed small effect sizes for occupant perceived physical health and self-assessed productivity. The majority of the effect sizes for the perceived well-being parameters were large and medium. In addition to analyzing the survey responses in aggregate, the responses were examined at the individual company level to confirm the by-company and aggregate findings aligned.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137615332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137615332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109539
DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109539
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137615332
SN - 0360-1323
VL - 224
JO - Building and Environment
JF - Building and Environment
M1 - 109539
ER -