Impatience in Timing Decisions: Effects and Moderation

Moojan Ghafurian, David T. Reitter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Decisions on when to act are critical in many health care, safety and security situations, where acting too early or too late can both lead to huge costs or losses. In this paper, impatience is investigated as a bias affecting timing decisions, and is successfully manipulated and moderated. Experiment 1 (N = 123) shows that in different tasks with the same duration, participants perform better when acting early is advantageous, as compared to when acting late is. Experiment 2 (N = 701) manipulates impatience and shows that impatience induced by delays (a) affects timing decisions in the subsequent tasks, (b) increases a tendency to receive information faster, only for a few seconds, with cost and no gain, and (c) reduces satisfaction in the subsequent task. Furthermore, impatience is significantly moderated by showing fast countdowns during the delays. Experiment 3 (N = 304) shows that the mechanism behind this impatience moderation is altered time perception and presents trade-offs between duration perception and duration recall.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-219
Number of pages37
JournalTiming and Time Perception
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Time Perception
Costs and Cost Analysis
Delivery of Health Care
Safety

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{77e33ff446a640cc86cedb474a79d997,
title = "Impatience in Timing Decisions: Effects and Moderation",
abstract = "Decisions on when to act are critical in many health care, safety and security situations, where acting too early or too late can both lead to huge costs or losses. In this paper, impatience is investigated as a bias affecting timing decisions, and is successfully manipulated and moderated. Experiment 1 (N = 123) shows that in different tasks with the same duration, participants perform better when acting early is advantageous, as compared to when acting late is. Experiment 2 (N = 701) manipulates impatience and shows that impatience induced by delays (a) affects timing decisions in the subsequent tasks, (b) increases a tendency to receive information faster, only for a few seconds, with cost and no gain, and (c) reduces satisfaction in the subsequent task. Furthermore, impatience is significantly moderated by showing fast countdowns during the delays. Experiment 3 (N = 304) shows that the mechanism behind this impatience moderation is altered time perception and presents trade-offs between duration perception and duration recall.",
author = "Moojan Ghafurian and Reitter, {David T.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/22134468-20181118",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "183--219",
journal = "Timing and Time Perception",
issn = "2213-4468",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2",

}

Impatience in Timing Decisions : Effects and Moderation. / Ghafurian, Moojan; Reitter, David T.

In: Timing and Time Perception, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 183-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impatience in Timing Decisions

T2 - Effects and Moderation

AU - Ghafurian, Moojan

AU - Reitter, David T.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Decisions on when to act are critical in many health care, safety and security situations, where acting too early or too late can both lead to huge costs or losses. In this paper, impatience is investigated as a bias affecting timing decisions, and is successfully manipulated and moderated. Experiment 1 (N = 123) shows that in different tasks with the same duration, participants perform better when acting early is advantageous, as compared to when acting late is. Experiment 2 (N = 701) manipulates impatience and shows that impatience induced by delays (a) affects timing decisions in the subsequent tasks, (b) increases a tendency to receive information faster, only for a few seconds, with cost and no gain, and (c) reduces satisfaction in the subsequent task. Furthermore, impatience is significantly moderated by showing fast countdowns during the delays. Experiment 3 (N = 304) shows that the mechanism behind this impatience moderation is altered time perception and presents trade-offs between duration perception and duration recall.

AB - Decisions on when to act are critical in many health care, safety and security situations, where acting too early or too late can both lead to huge costs or losses. In this paper, impatience is investigated as a bias affecting timing decisions, and is successfully manipulated and moderated. Experiment 1 (N = 123) shows that in different tasks with the same duration, participants perform better when acting early is advantageous, as compared to when acting late is. Experiment 2 (N = 701) manipulates impatience and shows that impatience induced by delays (a) affects timing decisions in the subsequent tasks, (b) increases a tendency to receive information faster, only for a few seconds, with cost and no gain, and (c) reduces satisfaction in the subsequent task. Furthermore, impatience is significantly moderated by showing fast countdowns during the delays. Experiment 3 (N = 304) shows that the mechanism behind this impatience moderation is altered time perception and presents trade-offs between duration perception and duration recall.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051021972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051021972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/22134468-20181118

DO - 10.1163/22134468-20181118

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85051021972

VL - 6

SP - 183

EP - 219

JO - Timing and Time Perception

JF - Timing and Time Perception

SN - 2213-4468

IS - 2

ER -