Implementation and evaluation of one-group interfacial area transport equation in TRACE

Justin D. Talley, Seungjin Kim, John Mahaffy, Stephen M. Bajorek, Kirk Tien

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The present study implements the one-dimensional interfacial area transport equation into the TRACE code, being developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The interfacial area transport equation replaces the conventional flow regime dependent correlations and the regime transition criteria for furnishing the interfacial area concentration in the two-fluid model. This approach allows dynamic tracking of the interfacial area concentration by mechanistically modeling bubble coalescence and disintegration mechanisms. Thus, it eliminates potential artificial bifurcations or numerical oscillations stemming from the use of conventional static correlations. To implement the interfacial area transport equation, a three-field version of TRACE is utilized, which is capable of tracking both the continuous liquid and gas fields as well as a dispersed gas field. To demonstrate the feasibility of the present approach, the steady-state one-group interfacial area transport equation applicable to adiabatic air-water bubbly two-phase flow is first tested in the present study. Data obtained in 18 different flow conditions from two vertical co-current upward air-water bubbly two-phase flow experiments performed in round pipes (25.4 mm and 48.3 mm) are used to help evaluate the implementation. Results obtained from TRACE with the interfacial area transport equation (TRACE-T) and those from TRACE without the transport equation (TRACE-NT) are compared to demonstrate the enhancement in prediction accuracy. The predictions made by TRACE-T agree well with the data with an average percent difference of approximately ±8%. It is also evident from the results that while TRACE-T accounts for dynamic interaction of bubbles along the flow field, the predictions made by TRACE-NT are attributed primarily to the pressure change.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)865-873
    Number of pages9
    JournalNuclear Engineering and Design
    Volume241
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

    Fingerprint

    Two phase flow
    evaluation
    Gases
    Water
    Disintegration
    two phase flow
    Air
    Coalescence
    gas field
    bubble
    water flow
    Flow fields
    prediction
    Pipe
    bubbles
    air currents
    predictions
    Fluids
    Liquids
    air

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
    • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
    • Materials Science(all)
    • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
    • Waste Management and Disposal
    • Mechanical Engineering

    Cite this

    Talley, Justin D. ; Kim, Seungjin ; Mahaffy, John ; Bajorek, Stephen M. ; Tien, Kirk. / Implementation and evaluation of one-group interfacial area transport equation in TRACE. In: Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2011 ; Vol. 241, No. 3. pp. 865-873.
    @article{634ac71db9414f21ba3368094044013e,
    title = "Implementation and evaluation of one-group interfacial area transport equation in TRACE",
    abstract = "The present study implements the one-dimensional interfacial area transport equation into the TRACE code, being developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The interfacial area transport equation replaces the conventional flow regime dependent correlations and the regime transition criteria for furnishing the interfacial area concentration in the two-fluid model. This approach allows dynamic tracking of the interfacial area concentration by mechanistically modeling bubble coalescence and disintegration mechanisms. Thus, it eliminates potential artificial bifurcations or numerical oscillations stemming from the use of conventional static correlations. To implement the interfacial area transport equation, a three-field version of TRACE is utilized, which is capable of tracking both the continuous liquid and gas fields as well as a dispersed gas field. To demonstrate the feasibility of the present approach, the steady-state one-group interfacial area transport equation applicable to adiabatic air-water bubbly two-phase flow is first tested in the present study. Data obtained in 18 different flow conditions from two vertical co-current upward air-water bubbly two-phase flow experiments performed in round pipes (25.4 mm and 48.3 mm) are used to help evaluate the implementation. Results obtained from TRACE with the interfacial area transport equation (TRACE-T) and those from TRACE without the transport equation (TRACE-NT) are compared to demonstrate the enhancement in prediction accuracy. The predictions made by TRACE-T agree well with the data with an average percent difference of approximately ±8{\%}. It is also evident from the results that while TRACE-T accounts for dynamic interaction of bubbles along the flow field, the predictions made by TRACE-NT are attributed primarily to the pressure change.",
    author = "Talley, {Justin D.} and Seungjin Kim and John Mahaffy and Bajorek, {Stephen M.} and Kirk Tien",
    year = "2011",
    month = "3",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.12.008",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "241",
    pages = "865--873",
    journal = "Nuclear Engineering and Design",
    issn = "0029-5493",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",
    number = "3",

    }

    Implementation and evaluation of one-group interfacial area transport equation in TRACE. / Talley, Justin D.; Kim, Seungjin; Mahaffy, John; Bajorek, Stephen M.; Tien, Kirk.

    In: Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 241, No. 3, 01.03.2011, p. 865-873.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Implementation and evaluation of one-group interfacial area transport equation in TRACE

    AU - Talley, Justin D.

    AU - Kim, Seungjin

    AU - Mahaffy, John

    AU - Bajorek, Stephen M.

    AU - Tien, Kirk

    PY - 2011/3/1

    Y1 - 2011/3/1

    N2 - The present study implements the one-dimensional interfacial area transport equation into the TRACE code, being developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The interfacial area transport equation replaces the conventional flow regime dependent correlations and the regime transition criteria for furnishing the interfacial area concentration in the two-fluid model. This approach allows dynamic tracking of the interfacial area concentration by mechanistically modeling bubble coalescence and disintegration mechanisms. Thus, it eliminates potential artificial bifurcations or numerical oscillations stemming from the use of conventional static correlations. To implement the interfacial area transport equation, a three-field version of TRACE is utilized, which is capable of tracking both the continuous liquid and gas fields as well as a dispersed gas field. To demonstrate the feasibility of the present approach, the steady-state one-group interfacial area transport equation applicable to adiabatic air-water bubbly two-phase flow is first tested in the present study. Data obtained in 18 different flow conditions from two vertical co-current upward air-water bubbly two-phase flow experiments performed in round pipes (25.4 mm and 48.3 mm) are used to help evaluate the implementation. Results obtained from TRACE with the interfacial area transport equation (TRACE-T) and those from TRACE without the transport equation (TRACE-NT) are compared to demonstrate the enhancement in prediction accuracy. The predictions made by TRACE-T agree well with the data with an average percent difference of approximately ±8%. It is also evident from the results that while TRACE-T accounts for dynamic interaction of bubbles along the flow field, the predictions made by TRACE-NT are attributed primarily to the pressure change.

    AB - The present study implements the one-dimensional interfacial area transport equation into the TRACE code, being developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The interfacial area transport equation replaces the conventional flow regime dependent correlations and the regime transition criteria for furnishing the interfacial area concentration in the two-fluid model. This approach allows dynamic tracking of the interfacial area concentration by mechanistically modeling bubble coalescence and disintegration mechanisms. Thus, it eliminates potential artificial bifurcations or numerical oscillations stemming from the use of conventional static correlations. To implement the interfacial area transport equation, a three-field version of TRACE is utilized, which is capable of tracking both the continuous liquid and gas fields as well as a dispersed gas field. To demonstrate the feasibility of the present approach, the steady-state one-group interfacial area transport equation applicable to adiabatic air-water bubbly two-phase flow is first tested in the present study. Data obtained in 18 different flow conditions from two vertical co-current upward air-water bubbly two-phase flow experiments performed in round pipes (25.4 mm and 48.3 mm) are used to help evaluate the implementation. Results obtained from TRACE with the interfacial area transport equation (TRACE-T) and those from TRACE without the transport equation (TRACE-NT) are compared to demonstrate the enhancement in prediction accuracy. The predictions made by TRACE-T agree well with the data with an average percent difference of approximately ±8%. It is also evident from the results that while TRACE-T accounts for dynamic interaction of bubbles along the flow field, the predictions made by TRACE-NT are attributed primarily to the pressure change.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952564982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952564982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.12.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.12.008

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:79952564982

    VL - 241

    SP - 865

    EP - 873

    JO - Nuclear Engineering and Design

    JF - Nuclear Engineering and Design

    SN - 0029-5493

    IS - 3

    ER -