Implementation of BTOP funding for public computing centers

Goal consensus and project performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper seeks to perform an assessment of the current state of implementation of BTOP-funded public computing center projects based on insights from principal-agent theory. Using newly available data on BTOP-funded PCC projects and correlating them with socioeconomic and geographic data derived from the US census and the FCC, we seek to assess whether program funds were targeted at unserved/underserved areas as required by program objectives, as well as the progress towards completion of PCC projects by type of grantee and funding amount. On the distribution of funds, we find that the PCCs supported were located in areas of high broadband availability as well as high demand: while this is contrary to the BTOP's stated purpose, we argue that it is actually more cost-effective to also target areas of high demand. It was also found that whereas a majority of PCC grants went to governmental agencies, who also received larger grants than non-governmental recipients, they were no more likely to generate a significantly higher percentage of matching funds or to move toward project completion sooner. We speculate that the intense competition for grants might have narrowed the performance gap between these categories of applicants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)514-524
Number of pages11
JournalGovernment Information Quarterly
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Fingerprint

funding
grant
performance
principal-agent-theory
demand
applicant
census
recipient
costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Cite this

@article{48c3a90854da44abb335e73e41c0a0a1,
title = "Implementation of BTOP funding for public computing centers: Goal consensus and project performance",
abstract = "This paper seeks to perform an assessment of the current state of implementation of BTOP-funded public computing center projects based on insights from principal-agent theory. Using newly available data on BTOP-funded PCC projects and correlating them with socioeconomic and geographic data derived from the US census and the FCC, we seek to assess whether program funds were targeted at unserved/underserved areas as required by program objectives, as well as the progress towards completion of PCC projects by type of grantee and funding amount. On the distribution of funds, we find that the PCCs supported were located in areas of high broadband availability as well as high demand: while this is contrary to the BTOP's stated purpose, we argue that it is actually more cost-effective to also target areas of high demand. It was also found that whereas a majority of PCC grants went to governmental agencies, who also received larger grants than non-governmental recipients, they were no more likely to generate a significantly higher percentage of matching funds or to move toward project completion sooner. We speculate that the intense competition for grants might have narrowed the performance gap between these categories of applicants.",
author = "Park, {Eun A.} and Jayakar, {Krishna Prasad}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "514--524",
journal = "Government Information Quarterly",
issn = "0740-624X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

Implementation of BTOP funding for public computing centers : Goal consensus and project performance. / Park, Eun A.; Jayakar, Krishna Prasad.

In: Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.10.2013, p. 514-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of BTOP funding for public computing centers

T2 - Goal consensus and project performance

AU - Park, Eun A.

AU - Jayakar, Krishna Prasad

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - This paper seeks to perform an assessment of the current state of implementation of BTOP-funded public computing center projects based on insights from principal-agent theory. Using newly available data on BTOP-funded PCC projects and correlating them with socioeconomic and geographic data derived from the US census and the FCC, we seek to assess whether program funds were targeted at unserved/underserved areas as required by program objectives, as well as the progress towards completion of PCC projects by type of grantee and funding amount. On the distribution of funds, we find that the PCCs supported were located in areas of high broadband availability as well as high demand: while this is contrary to the BTOP's stated purpose, we argue that it is actually more cost-effective to also target areas of high demand. It was also found that whereas a majority of PCC grants went to governmental agencies, who also received larger grants than non-governmental recipients, they were no more likely to generate a significantly higher percentage of matching funds or to move toward project completion sooner. We speculate that the intense competition for grants might have narrowed the performance gap between these categories of applicants.

AB - This paper seeks to perform an assessment of the current state of implementation of BTOP-funded public computing center projects based on insights from principal-agent theory. Using newly available data on BTOP-funded PCC projects and correlating them with socioeconomic and geographic data derived from the US census and the FCC, we seek to assess whether program funds were targeted at unserved/underserved areas as required by program objectives, as well as the progress towards completion of PCC projects by type of grantee and funding amount. On the distribution of funds, we find that the PCCs supported were located in areas of high broadband availability as well as high demand: while this is contrary to the BTOP's stated purpose, we argue that it is actually more cost-effective to also target areas of high demand. It was also found that whereas a majority of PCC grants went to governmental agencies, who also received larger grants than non-governmental recipients, they were no more likely to generate a significantly higher percentage of matching funds or to move toward project completion sooner. We speculate that the intense competition for grants might have narrowed the performance gap between these categories of applicants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890246375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890246375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.002

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 514

EP - 524

JO - Government Information Quarterly

JF - Government Information Quarterly

SN - 0740-624X

IS - 4

ER -