Imposing Advice on Powerful People

Lyn M. Van Swol, Andrew Prahl, Erina Lynne Macgeorge, Sara Branch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines how advice recipients’ feelings of power and the solicitation of advice affects the perception of advice. Participants were primed for low or high power, wrote about a personal problem, and shared it online to a peer. The peer was a confederate who gave advice. Advice was either permitted (participant was asked if they wanted advice and said yes), guaranteed (participant was given advice without asking if wanted), or imposed (participant said they did not want advice, but advice was given). Participants had lower utilization intentions and positive emotions for imposed advice than permitted or guaranteed advice. High power participants had lower intentions than low power participants to use imposed advice, especially when disclosing a more personal problem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCommunication Reports
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

emotion
recipient
utilization
Intentions
Peers
Emotion
Confederate
Recipient

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Van Swol, Lyn M. ; Prahl, Andrew ; Macgeorge, Erina Lynne ; Branch, Sara. / Imposing Advice on Powerful People. In: Communication Reports. 2019.
@article{1e371b2a157744f1a80a053250219f04,
title = "Imposing Advice on Powerful People",
abstract = "This paper examines how advice recipients’ feelings of power and the solicitation of advice affects the perception of advice. Participants were primed for low or high power, wrote about a personal problem, and shared it online to a peer. The peer was a confederate who gave advice. Advice was either permitted (participant was asked if they wanted advice and said yes), guaranteed (participant was given advice without asking if wanted), or imposed (participant said they did not want advice, but advice was given). Participants had lower utilization intentions and positive emotions for imposed advice than permitted or guaranteed advice. High power participants had lower intentions than low power participants to use imposed advice, especially when disclosing a more personal problem.",
author = "{Van Swol}, {Lyn M.} and Andrew Prahl and Macgeorge, {Erina Lynne} and Sara Branch",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08934215.2019.1655082",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Communication Reports",
issn = "0893-4215",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Imposing Advice on Powerful People. / Van Swol, Lyn M.; Prahl, Andrew; Macgeorge, Erina Lynne; Branch, Sara.

In: Communication Reports, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imposing Advice on Powerful People

AU - Van Swol, Lyn M.

AU - Prahl, Andrew

AU - Macgeorge, Erina Lynne

AU - Branch, Sara

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This paper examines how advice recipients’ feelings of power and the solicitation of advice affects the perception of advice. Participants were primed for low or high power, wrote about a personal problem, and shared it online to a peer. The peer was a confederate who gave advice. Advice was either permitted (participant was asked if they wanted advice and said yes), guaranteed (participant was given advice without asking if wanted), or imposed (participant said they did not want advice, but advice was given). Participants had lower utilization intentions and positive emotions for imposed advice than permitted or guaranteed advice. High power participants had lower intentions than low power participants to use imposed advice, especially when disclosing a more personal problem.

AB - This paper examines how advice recipients’ feelings of power and the solicitation of advice affects the perception of advice. Participants were primed for low or high power, wrote about a personal problem, and shared it online to a peer. The peer was a confederate who gave advice. Advice was either permitted (participant was asked if they wanted advice and said yes), guaranteed (participant was given advice without asking if wanted), or imposed (participant said they did not want advice, but advice was given). Participants had lower utilization intentions and positive emotions for imposed advice than permitted or guaranteed advice. High power participants had lower intentions than low power participants to use imposed advice, especially when disclosing a more personal problem.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070978433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070978433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08934215.2019.1655082

DO - 10.1080/08934215.2019.1655082

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070978433

JO - Communication Reports

JF - Communication Reports

SN - 0893-4215

ER -