Improving care delivery at the community level: an examination of the AF4Q legacy

Megan McHugh, Jillian B. Harvey, Jaime Hamil, Dennis Patrick Scanlon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) was the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's nearly 10-year, multicomponent initiative to create meaningful and sustainable change in 16 communities. Our purpose was to describe the likely legacy of the care delivery component of AF4Q among participating communities and the factors that influenced the legacy.

METHODS: We used a multiple-case study approach. Our analysis relied on 3 key documents for each community, based on key informant interviews conducted between 2006 and 2015: (1) a summary of the community's care delivery activities under AF4Q, (2) a summary of the community's experience in the AF4Q program, and (3) a summary of the characteristics of each community and the multi-stakeholder alliance that led local efforts under AF4Q. We used a team-based consensual approach to analysis.

RESULTS: We identified 3 types of legacies: (1) in 3 communities, there appear to be sustained infrastructures or wide-reaching activities attributable to AF4Q; (2) in 5 communities, AF4Q participation was used to advance preexisting activities; and (3) in 8 communities, the care delivery legacy is likely to be limited, because the local alliance focused on performance measurement instead of care delivery or the care delivery activities had limited reach and sustainability. Community contextual factors (eg, availability of other grant support) and alliance characteristics (eg, areas of expertise) greatly influenced the AF4Q care delivery legacy.

CONCLUSION: AF4Q appears to have created meaningful and sustained change in care delivery in half of the participating communities. Among the other communities, the considerable financial support and technical assistance provided by RWJF was not enough to overcome some of the contextual barriers that often hamper quality-improvement efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)s393-s402
JournalThe American journal of managed care
Volume22
Issue number12
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Financial Support
Organized Financing
Quality Improvement
Interviews
Community Participation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

McHugh, Megan ; Harvey, Jillian B. ; Hamil, Jaime ; Scanlon, Dennis Patrick. / Improving care delivery at the community level : an examination of the AF4Q legacy. In: The American journal of managed care. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 12. pp. s393-s402.
@article{7bbbb98b1deb41cb8b3c969fb1ced107,
title = "Improving care delivery at the community level: an examination of the AF4Q legacy",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) was the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's nearly 10-year, multicomponent initiative to create meaningful and sustainable change in 16 communities. Our purpose was to describe the likely legacy of the care delivery component of AF4Q among participating communities and the factors that influenced the legacy.METHODS: We used a multiple-case study approach. Our analysis relied on 3 key documents for each community, based on key informant interviews conducted between 2006 and 2015: (1) a summary of the community's care delivery activities under AF4Q, (2) a summary of the community's experience in the AF4Q program, and (3) a summary of the characteristics of each community and the multi-stakeholder alliance that led local efforts under AF4Q. We used a team-based consensual approach to analysis.RESULTS: We identified 3 types of legacies: (1) in 3 communities, there appear to be sustained infrastructures or wide-reaching activities attributable to AF4Q; (2) in 5 communities, AF4Q participation was used to advance preexisting activities; and (3) in 8 communities, the care delivery legacy is likely to be limited, because the local alliance focused on performance measurement instead of care delivery or the care delivery activities had limited reach and sustainability. Community contextual factors (eg, availability of other grant support) and alliance characteristics (eg, areas of expertise) greatly influenced the AF4Q care delivery legacy.CONCLUSION: AF4Q appears to have created meaningful and sustained change in care delivery in half of the participating communities. Among the other communities, the considerable financial support and technical assistance provided by RWJF was not enough to overcome some of the contextual barriers that often hamper quality-improvement efforts.",
author = "Megan McHugh and Harvey, {Jillian B.} and Jaime Hamil and Scanlon, {Dennis Patrick}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "s393--s402",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "12",

}

Improving care delivery at the community level : an examination of the AF4Q legacy. / McHugh, Megan; Harvey, Jillian B.; Hamil, Jaime; Scanlon, Dennis Patrick.

In: The American journal of managed care, Vol. 22, No. 12, 01.08.2016, p. s393-s402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving care delivery at the community level

T2 - an examination of the AF4Q legacy

AU - McHugh, Megan

AU - Harvey, Jillian B.

AU - Hamil, Jaime

AU - Scanlon, Dennis Patrick

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) was the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's nearly 10-year, multicomponent initiative to create meaningful and sustainable change in 16 communities. Our purpose was to describe the likely legacy of the care delivery component of AF4Q among participating communities and the factors that influenced the legacy.METHODS: We used a multiple-case study approach. Our analysis relied on 3 key documents for each community, based on key informant interviews conducted between 2006 and 2015: (1) a summary of the community's care delivery activities under AF4Q, (2) a summary of the community's experience in the AF4Q program, and (3) a summary of the characteristics of each community and the multi-stakeholder alliance that led local efforts under AF4Q. We used a team-based consensual approach to analysis.RESULTS: We identified 3 types of legacies: (1) in 3 communities, there appear to be sustained infrastructures or wide-reaching activities attributable to AF4Q; (2) in 5 communities, AF4Q participation was used to advance preexisting activities; and (3) in 8 communities, the care delivery legacy is likely to be limited, because the local alliance focused on performance measurement instead of care delivery or the care delivery activities had limited reach and sustainability. Community contextual factors (eg, availability of other grant support) and alliance characteristics (eg, areas of expertise) greatly influenced the AF4Q care delivery legacy.CONCLUSION: AF4Q appears to have created meaningful and sustained change in care delivery in half of the participating communities. Among the other communities, the considerable financial support and technical assistance provided by RWJF was not enough to overcome some of the contextual barriers that often hamper quality-improvement efforts.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) was the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's nearly 10-year, multicomponent initiative to create meaningful and sustainable change in 16 communities. Our purpose was to describe the likely legacy of the care delivery component of AF4Q among participating communities and the factors that influenced the legacy.METHODS: We used a multiple-case study approach. Our analysis relied on 3 key documents for each community, based on key informant interviews conducted between 2006 and 2015: (1) a summary of the community's care delivery activities under AF4Q, (2) a summary of the community's experience in the AF4Q program, and (3) a summary of the characteristics of each community and the multi-stakeholder alliance that led local efforts under AF4Q. We used a team-based consensual approach to analysis.RESULTS: We identified 3 types of legacies: (1) in 3 communities, there appear to be sustained infrastructures or wide-reaching activities attributable to AF4Q; (2) in 5 communities, AF4Q participation was used to advance preexisting activities; and (3) in 8 communities, the care delivery legacy is likely to be limited, because the local alliance focused on performance measurement instead of care delivery or the care delivery activities had limited reach and sustainability. Community contextual factors (eg, availability of other grant support) and alliance characteristics (eg, areas of expertise) greatly influenced the AF4Q care delivery legacy.CONCLUSION: AF4Q appears to have created meaningful and sustained change in care delivery in half of the participating communities. Among the other communities, the considerable financial support and technical assistance provided by RWJF was not enough to overcome some of the contextual barriers that often hamper quality-improvement efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041247713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041247713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 27567513

AN - SCOPUS:85041247713

VL - 22

SP - s393-s402

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 12

ER -