Improving grading consistency through grade lift reporting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We define Grade Lift as the difference between average class grade and average cumulative class GPA. This metric provides an assessment of how lenient the grading was for a given course. In 2006, we started providing faculty members individualized Grade Lift reports reflecting their position relative to an anonymously plotted school-wide distribution. Two schools elected to participate in this reporting, and two other schools declined. To analyze the effect of Grade Lift reporting, we used paired comparisons of Grade Lift measures for the same faculty teaching the same course before and after reporting has started. Statistical analysis shows that, only in the two schools that participated, there was a reduction in both variance as well as average levels of Grade Lift. If these results can be replicated at other universities, Grade Lift reporting may become a useful tool for increasing grading consistency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPractical Assessment, Research and Evaluation
Volume15
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

grading
school
statistical analysis
university
Teaching

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{10aa3d5fa5724d82992bc2170354f749,
title = "Improving grading consistency through grade lift reporting",
abstract = "We define Grade Lift as the difference between average class grade and average cumulative class GPA. This metric provides an assessment of how lenient the grading was for a given course. In 2006, we started providing faculty members individualized Grade Lift reports reflecting their position relative to an anonymously plotted school-wide distribution. Two schools elected to participate in this reporting, and two other schools declined. To analyze the effect of Grade Lift reporting, we used paired comparisons of Grade Lift measures for the same faculty teaching the same course before and after reporting has started. Statistical analysis shows that, only in the two schools that participated, there was a reduction in both variance as well as average levels of Grade Lift. If these results can be replicated at other universities, Grade Lift reporting may become a useful tool for increasing grading consistency.",
author = "Ido Millet",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation",
issn = "1531-7714",
publisher = "PAREOnline",
number = "4",

}

Improving grading consistency through grade lift reporting. / Millet, Ido.

In: Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.12.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving grading consistency through grade lift reporting

AU - Millet, Ido

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - We define Grade Lift as the difference between average class grade and average cumulative class GPA. This metric provides an assessment of how lenient the grading was for a given course. In 2006, we started providing faculty members individualized Grade Lift reports reflecting their position relative to an anonymously plotted school-wide distribution. Two schools elected to participate in this reporting, and two other schools declined. To analyze the effect of Grade Lift reporting, we used paired comparisons of Grade Lift measures for the same faculty teaching the same course before and after reporting has started. Statistical analysis shows that, only in the two schools that participated, there was a reduction in both variance as well as average levels of Grade Lift. If these results can be replicated at other universities, Grade Lift reporting may become a useful tool for increasing grading consistency.

AB - We define Grade Lift as the difference between average class grade and average cumulative class GPA. This metric provides an assessment of how lenient the grading was for a given course. In 2006, we started providing faculty members individualized Grade Lift reports reflecting their position relative to an anonymously plotted school-wide distribution. Two schools elected to participate in this reporting, and two other schools declined. To analyze the effect of Grade Lift reporting, we used paired comparisons of Grade Lift measures for the same faculty teaching the same course before and after reporting has started. Statistical analysis shows that, only in the two schools that participated, there was a reduction in both variance as well as average levels of Grade Lift. If these results can be replicated at other universities, Grade Lift reporting may become a useful tool for increasing grading consistency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051893721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051893721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80051893721

VL - 15

JO - Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

JF - Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

SN - 1531-7714

IS - 4

ER -