Pour une meilleure évaluation de la politique de développement ruralDie Evaluation der Politik zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums verbessern

Translated title of the contribution: Improving the Evaluation of Rural Development Policy

David Blandford, Richard N. Boisvert, Berkeley Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A previous EuroChoices (Vol. 7, No. 1) compared and contrasted approaches to rural development policy in the EU and US. This Special Issue focuses on the evaluation of these policies, drawing on a workshop held in June 2009 at OECD Conference Center in Paris. Evaluation is an activity that runs parallel with policymaking and is capable of contributing to effectiveness and efficiency at all stages. Evaluators, wherever they work and whatever aspect of rural development is their focus, face some common technical problems. These include multiple (and often ill-defined) policy objectives, the choice of appropriate indicators (especially the need to distinguish between outputs and outcomes), how to establish baseline values, where to draw boundaries in terms of impact and time, and the identification of additionality and causality. Ensuring that lessons learned from evaluation are actually applied is problematic. Experiences covered in this Issue include the use of macro and case-study approaches, and various schemes (investment in human and social capital, and agri-environment and forestry). There is an inherent tension between using a common approach across countries and regions in the interests of comparability and the flexibility needed to capture all the relevant factors in the diverse situations in which rural development actions take place.

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)4-9
Number of pages6
JournalEuroChoices
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

rural development
development policy
evaluation
social capital
human capital
OECD
causality
forestry
flexibility
EU
efficiency
policy
Values
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{d95fdb98f5f747e7bcaf03605e054adb,
title = "Pour une meilleure {\'e}valuation de la politique de d{\'e}veloppement ruralDie Evaluation der Politik zur Entwicklung des l{\"a}ndlichen Raums verbessern",
abstract = "A previous EuroChoices (Vol. 7, No. 1) compared and contrasted approaches to rural development policy in the EU and US. This Special Issue focuses on the evaluation of these policies, drawing on a workshop held in June 2009 at OECD Conference Center in Paris. Evaluation is an activity that runs parallel with policymaking and is capable of contributing to effectiveness and efficiency at all stages. Evaluators, wherever they work and whatever aspect of rural development is their focus, face some common technical problems. These include multiple (and often ill-defined) policy objectives, the choice of appropriate indicators (especially the need to distinguish between outputs and outcomes), how to establish baseline values, where to draw boundaries in terms of impact and time, and the identification of additionality and causality. Ensuring that lessons learned from evaluation are actually applied is problematic. Experiences covered in this Issue include the use of macro and case-study approaches, and various schemes (investment in human and social capital, and agri-environment and forestry). There is an inherent tension between using a common approach across countries and regions in the interests of comparability and the flexibility needed to capture all the relevant factors in the diverse situations in which rural development actions take place.",
author = "David Blandford and Boisvert, {Richard N.} and Berkeley Hill",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00147.x",
language = "German",
volume = "9",
pages = "4--9",
journal = "EuroChoices",
issn = "1478-0917",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Pour une meilleure évaluation de la politique de développement ruralDie Evaluation der Politik zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums verbessern. / Blandford, David; Boisvert, Richard N.; Hill, Berkeley.

In: EuroChoices, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.04.2010, p. 4-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pour une meilleure évaluation de la politique de développement ruralDie Evaluation der Politik zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums verbessern

AU - Blandford, David

AU - Boisvert, Richard N.

AU - Hill, Berkeley

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - A previous EuroChoices (Vol. 7, No. 1) compared and contrasted approaches to rural development policy in the EU and US. This Special Issue focuses on the evaluation of these policies, drawing on a workshop held in June 2009 at OECD Conference Center in Paris. Evaluation is an activity that runs parallel with policymaking and is capable of contributing to effectiveness and efficiency at all stages. Evaluators, wherever they work and whatever aspect of rural development is their focus, face some common technical problems. These include multiple (and often ill-defined) policy objectives, the choice of appropriate indicators (especially the need to distinguish between outputs and outcomes), how to establish baseline values, where to draw boundaries in terms of impact and time, and the identification of additionality and causality. Ensuring that lessons learned from evaluation are actually applied is problematic. Experiences covered in this Issue include the use of macro and case-study approaches, and various schemes (investment in human and social capital, and agri-environment and forestry). There is an inherent tension between using a common approach across countries and regions in the interests of comparability and the flexibility needed to capture all the relevant factors in the diverse situations in which rural development actions take place.

AB - A previous EuroChoices (Vol. 7, No. 1) compared and contrasted approaches to rural development policy in the EU and US. This Special Issue focuses on the evaluation of these policies, drawing on a workshop held in June 2009 at OECD Conference Center in Paris. Evaluation is an activity that runs parallel with policymaking and is capable of contributing to effectiveness and efficiency at all stages. Evaluators, wherever they work and whatever aspect of rural development is their focus, face some common technical problems. These include multiple (and often ill-defined) policy objectives, the choice of appropriate indicators (especially the need to distinguish between outputs and outcomes), how to establish baseline values, where to draw boundaries in terms of impact and time, and the identification of additionality and causality. Ensuring that lessons learned from evaluation are actually applied is problematic. Experiences covered in this Issue include the use of macro and case-study approaches, and various schemes (investment in human and social capital, and agri-environment and forestry). There is an inherent tension between using a common approach across countries and regions in the interests of comparability and the flexibility needed to capture all the relevant factors in the diverse situations in which rural development actions take place.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953089283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953089283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00147.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00147.x

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:77953089283

VL - 9

SP - 4

EP - 9

JO - EuroChoices

JF - EuroChoices

SN - 1478-0917

IS - 1

ER -