Improving the Pace of Criminal Case Processing in State Trial Courts

Brian J. Ostrom, Roger A. Hanson, Matthew Kleiman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Delay in the processing of criminal cases has long been viewed as a serious national problem. Substantial differences exist among courts in the average time it takes to resolve both felony and misdemeanor cases, with past research producing inconclusive results on the causes of observed variation. In response, and with the support of the Arnold Foundation, the objective of this article is to highlight predictable variation in the timeliness of criminal case processing and how this knowledge supports court efforts to become more expeditious. Drawing on an extensive set of felony and misdemeanor cases resolved in seven Colorado courts, statistical analysis uncovers important patterns in the composition of criminal caseloads and clarifies how composition influences case duration. Moreover, similarities in the makeup of criminal caseloads show the utility of fundamental principles of criminal caseflow management and how courts benefit from being assessed comparatively against established performance benchmarks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)736-760
Number of pages25
JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
Volume29
Issue number6-7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

misdemeanor
statistical analysis
cause
management
performance
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

Ostrom, Brian J. ; Hanson, Roger A. ; Kleiman, Matthew. / Improving the Pace of Criminal Case Processing in State Trial Courts. In: Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 6-7. pp. 736-760.
@article{d9461f8e28944e6db779d3f223fb1d21,
title = "Improving the Pace of Criminal Case Processing in State Trial Courts",
abstract = "Delay in the processing of criminal cases has long been viewed as a serious national problem. Substantial differences exist among courts in the average time it takes to resolve both felony and misdemeanor cases, with past research producing inconclusive results on the causes of observed variation. In response, and with the support of the Arnold Foundation, the objective of this article is to highlight predictable variation in the timeliness of criminal case processing and how this knowledge supports court efforts to become more expeditious. Drawing on an extensive set of felony and misdemeanor cases resolved in seven Colorado courts, statistical analysis uncovers important patterns in the composition of criminal caseloads and clarifies how composition influences case duration. Moreover, similarities in the makeup of criminal caseloads show the utility of fundamental principles of criminal caseflow management and how courts benefit from being assessed comparatively against established performance benchmarks.",
author = "Ostrom, {Brian J.} and Hanson, {Roger A.} and Matthew Kleiman",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0887403417748721",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "736--760",
journal = "Criminal Justice Policy Review",
issn = "0887-4034",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6-7",

}

Improving the Pace of Criminal Case Processing in State Trial Courts. / Ostrom, Brian J.; Hanson, Roger A.; Kleiman, Matthew.

In: Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 29, No. 6-7, 01.07.2018, p. 736-760.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the Pace of Criminal Case Processing in State Trial Courts

AU - Ostrom, Brian J.

AU - Hanson, Roger A.

AU - Kleiman, Matthew

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Delay in the processing of criminal cases has long been viewed as a serious national problem. Substantial differences exist among courts in the average time it takes to resolve both felony and misdemeanor cases, with past research producing inconclusive results on the causes of observed variation. In response, and with the support of the Arnold Foundation, the objective of this article is to highlight predictable variation in the timeliness of criminal case processing and how this knowledge supports court efforts to become more expeditious. Drawing on an extensive set of felony and misdemeanor cases resolved in seven Colorado courts, statistical analysis uncovers important patterns in the composition of criminal caseloads and clarifies how composition influences case duration. Moreover, similarities in the makeup of criminal caseloads show the utility of fundamental principles of criminal caseflow management and how courts benefit from being assessed comparatively against established performance benchmarks.

AB - Delay in the processing of criminal cases has long been viewed as a serious national problem. Substantial differences exist among courts in the average time it takes to resolve both felony and misdemeanor cases, with past research producing inconclusive results on the causes of observed variation. In response, and with the support of the Arnold Foundation, the objective of this article is to highlight predictable variation in the timeliness of criminal case processing and how this knowledge supports court efforts to become more expeditious. Drawing on an extensive set of felony and misdemeanor cases resolved in seven Colorado courts, statistical analysis uncovers important patterns in the composition of criminal caseloads and clarifies how composition influences case duration. Moreover, similarities in the makeup of criminal caseloads show the utility of fundamental principles of criminal caseflow management and how courts benefit from being assessed comparatively against established performance benchmarks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046728290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046728290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0887403417748721

DO - 10.1177/0887403417748721

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046728290

VL - 29

SP - 736

EP - 760

JO - Criminal Justice Policy Review

JF - Criminal Justice Policy Review

SN - 0887-4034

IS - 6-7

ER -