Improving the representation of roots in terrestrial models

Erica A.H. Smithwick, Melissa S. Lucash, M. Luke McCormack, Gajan Sivandran

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Root biomass, root production and lifespan, and root-mycorrhizal interactions govern soil carbon fluxes and resource uptake and are critical components of terrestrial models. However, limitations in data and confusions over terminology, together with a strong dependence on a small set of conceptual frameworks, have limited the exploration of root function in terrestrial models. We review the key root processes of interest to both field ecologists and modelers including root classification, production, turnover, biomass, resource uptake, and depth distribution to ask (1) what are contemporary approaches for modeling roots in terrestrial models? and (2) can these approaches be improved via recent advancements in field research methods? We isolate several emerging themes that are ready for collaboration among field scientists and modelers: (1) alternatives to size-class based root classifications based on function and the inclusion of fungal symbioses, (2) dynamic root allocation and phenology as a function of root environment, rather than leaf demand alone, (3) improved understanding of the treatment of root turnover in models, including the role of root tissue chemistry on root lifespan, (4) better estimates of root stocks across sites and species to parameterize or validate models, and (5) dynamic interplay among rooting depth, resource availability and resource uptake. Greater attention to model parameterization and structural representation of roots will lead to greater appreciation for belowground processes in terrestrial models and improve estimates of ecosystem resilience to global change drivers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-204
Number of pages12
JournalEcological Modelling
Volume291
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 10 2014

Fingerprint

turnover
resource
ecosystem resilience
rootstock
biomass
research method
resource availability
carbon flux
terminology
symbiosis
rooting
soil carbon
conceptual framework
global change
phenology
vertical distribution
parameterization
modeling
demand
tissue

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecological Modeling

Cite this

Smithwick, Erica A.H. ; Lucash, Melissa S. ; McCormack, M. Luke ; Sivandran, Gajan. / Improving the representation of roots in terrestrial models. In: Ecological Modelling. 2014 ; Vol. 291. pp. 193-204.
@article{32c54460a2634f418b271f9479289540,
title = "Improving the representation of roots in terrestrial models",
abstract = "Root biomass, root production and lifespan, and root-mycorrhizal interactions govern soil carbon fluxes and resource uptake and are critical components of terrestrial models. However, limitations in data and confusions over terminology, together with a strong dependence on a small set of conceptual frameworks, have limited the exploration of root function in terrestrial models. We review the key root processes of interest to both field ecologists and modelers including root classification, production, turnover, biomass, resource uptake, and depth distribution to ask (1) what are contemporary approaches for modeling roots in terrestrial models? and (2) can these approaches be improved via recent advancements in field research methods? We isolate several emerging themes that are ready for collaboration among field scientists and modelers: (1) alternatives to size-class based root classifications based on function and the inclusion of fungal symbioses, (2) dynamic root allocation and phenology as a function of root environment, rather than leaf demand alone, (3) improved understanding of the treatment of root turnover in models, including the role of root tissue chemistry on root lifespan, (4) better estimates of root stocks across sites and species to parameterize or validate models, and (5) dynamic interplay among rooting depth, resource availability and resource uptake. Greater attention to model parameterization and structural representation of roots will lead to greater appreciation for belowground processes in terrestrial models and improve estimates of ecosystem resilience to global change drivers.",
author = "Smithwick, {Erica A.H.} and Lucash, {Melissa S.} and McCormack, {M. Luke} and Gajan Sivandran",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "291",
pages = "193--204",
journal = "Ecological Modelling",
issn = "0304-3800",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Improving the representation of roots in terrestrial models. / Smithwick, Erica A.H.; Lucash, Melissa S.; McCormack, M. Luke; Sivandran, Gajan.

In: Ecological Modelling, Vol. 291, 10.11.2014, p. 193-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the representation of roots in terrestrial models

AU - Smithwick, Erica A.H.

AU - Lucash, Melissa S.

AU - McCormack, M. Luke

AU - Sivandran, Gajan

PY - 2014/11/10

Y1 - 2014/11/10

N2 - Root biomass, root production and lifespan, and root-mycorrhizal interactions govern soil carbon fluxes and resource uptake and are critical components of terrestrial models. However, limitations in data and confusions over terminology, together with a strong dependence on a small set of conceptual frameworks, have limited the exploration of root function in terrestrial models. We review the key root processes of interest to both field ecologists and modelers including root classification, production, turnover, biomass, resource uptake, and depth distribution to ask (1) what are contemporary approaches for modeling roots in terrestrial models? and (2) can these approaches be improved via recent advancements in field research methods? We isolate several emerging themes that are ready for collaboration among field scientists and modelers: (1) alternatives to size-class based root classifications based on function and the inclusion of fungal symbioses, (2) dynamic root allocation and phenology as a function of root environment, rather than leaf demand alone, (3) improved understanding of the treatment of root turnover in models, including the role of root tissue chemistry on root lifespan, (4) better estimates of root stocks across sites and species to parameterize or validate models, and (5) dynamic interplay among rooting depth, resource availability and resource uptake. Greater attention to model parameterization and structural representation of roots will lead to greater appreciation for belowground processes in terrestrial models and improve estimates of ecosystem resilience to global change drivers.

AB - Root biomass, root production and lifespan, and root-mycorrhizal interactions govern soil carbon fluxes and resource uptake and are critical components of terrestrial models. However, limitations in data and confusions over terminology, together with a strong dependence on a small set of conceptual frameworks, have limited the exploration of root function in terrestrial models. We review the key root processes of interest to both field ecologists and modelers including root classification, production, turnover, biomass, resource uptake, and depth distribution to ask (1) what are contemporary approaches for modeling roots in terrestrial models? and (2) can these approaches be improved via recent advancements in field research methods? We isolate several emerging themes that are ready for collaboration among field scientists and modelers: (1) alternatives to size-class based root classifications based on function and the inclusion of fungal symbioses, (2) dynamic root allocation and phenology as a function of root environment, rather than leaf demand alone, (3) improved understanding of the treatment of root turnover in models, including the role of root tissue chemistry on root lifespan, (4) better estimates of root stocks across sites and species to parameterize or validate models, and (5) dynamic interplay among rooting depth, resource availability and resource uptake. Greater attention to model parameterization and structural representation of roots will lead to greater appreciation for belowground processes in terrestrial models and improve estimates of ecosystem resilience to global change drivers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906686929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906686929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.023

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.023

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84906686929

VL - 291

SP - 193

EP - 204

JO - Ecological Modelling

JF - Ecological Modelling

SN - 0304-3800

ER -