Improving the urban stream restoration effort: Identifying critical form and processes relationships

Sue L. Niezgoda, Peggy A. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stream restoration projects are often based on morphological form or stream type and, as a result, there needs to be a clear tie established between form and function of the stream. An examination of the literature identifies numerous relationships in naturally forming streams that link morphologic form and stream processes. Urban stream restoration designs often work around infrastructure and incorporate bank stabilization and grade control structures. Because of these imposed constraints and highly altered hydrologic and sediment discharge regimens, the design of urban channel projects is rather unclear. In this paper, we examine the state of the art in relationships between form and processes, the strengths and weaknesses of these existing relationships, and the current lack of understanding in applying these relationships in the urban environment. In particular, we identify relationships that are critical to urban stream restoration projects and provide recommendations for future research into how this information can be used to improve urban stream restoration design. It is also suggested that improving the success of urban restoration projects requires further investigation into incorporating process-based methodologies, which can potentially reduce ambiguity in the design and the necessity of using an abundant amount of in-stream structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)579-592
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2005

Fingerprint

Restoration
Sediments
Stabilization
restoration
stabilization
infrastructure
methodology
project
sediment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Pollution

Cite this

@article{be6c031ccced4b96b7d4c24874119882,
title = "Improving the urban stream restoration effort: Identifying critical form and processes relationships",
abstract = "Stream restoration projects are often based on morphological form or stream type and, as a result, there needs to be a clear tie established between form and function of the stream. An examination of the literature identifies numerous relationships in naturally forming streams that link morphologic form and stream processes. Urban stream restoration designs often work around infrastructure and incorporate bank stabilization and grade control structures. Because of these imposed constraints and highly altered hydrologic and sediment discharge regimens, the design of urban channel projects is rather unclear. In this paper, we examine the state of the art in relationships between form and processes, the strengths and weaknesses of these existing relationships, and the current lack of understanding in applying these relationships in the urban environment. In particular, we identify relationships that are critical to urban stream restoration projects and provide recommendations for future research into how this information can be used to improve urban stream restoration design. It is also suggested that improving the success of urban restoration projects requires further investigation into incorporating process-based methodologies, which can potentially reduce ambiguity in the design and the necessity of using an abundant amount of in-stream structures.",
author = "Niezgoda, {Sue L.} and Johnson, {Peggy A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-004-0088-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "579--592",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

Improving the urban stream restoration effort : Identifying critical form and processes relationships. / Niezgoda, Sue L.; Johnson, Peggy A.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 35, No. 5, 01.05.2005, p. 579-592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the urban stream restoration effort

T2 - Identifying critical form and processes relationships

AU - Niezgoda, Sue L.

AU - Johnson, Peggy A.

PY - 2005/5/1

Y1 - 2005/5/1

N2 - Stream restoration projects are often based on morphological form or stream type and, as a result, there needs to be a clear tie established between form and function of the stream. An examination of the literature identifies numerous relationships in naturally forming streams that link morphologic form and stream processes. Urban stream restoration designs often work around infrastructure and incorporate bank stabilization and grade control structures. Because of these imposed constraints and highly altered hydrologic and sediment discharge regimens, the design of urban channel projects is rather unclear. In this paper, we examine the state of the art in relationships between form and processes, the strengths and weaknesses of these existing relationships, and the current lack of understanding in applying these relationships in the urban environment. In particular, we identify relationships that are critical to urban stream restoration projects and provide recommendations for future research into how this information can be used to improve urban stream restoration design. It is also suggested that improving the success of urban restoration projects requires further investigation into incorporating process-based methodologies, which can potentially reduce ambiguity in the design and the necessity of using an abundant amount of in-stream structures.

AB - Stream restoration projects are often based on morphological form or stream type and, as a result, there needs to be a clear tie established between form and function of the stream. An examination of the literature identifies numerous relationships in naturally forming streams that link morphologic form and stream processes. Urban stream restoration designs often work around infrastructure and incorporate bank stabilization and grade control structures. Because of these imposed constraints and highly altered hydrologic and sediment discharge regimens, the design of urban channel projects is rather unclear. In this paper, we examine the state of the art in relationships between form and processes, the strengths and weaknesses of these existing relationships, and the current lack of understanding in applying these relationships in the urban environment. In particular, we identify relationships that are critical to urban stream restoration projects and provide recommendations for future research into how this information can be used to improve urban stream restoration design. It is also suggested that improving the success of urban restoration projects requires further investigation into incorporating process-based methodologies, which can potentially reduce ambiguity in the design and the necessity of using an abundant amount of in-stream structures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21244486797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21244486797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-004-0088-8

DO - 10.1007/s00267-004-0088-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 15902441

AN - SCOPUS:21244486797

VL - 35

SP - 579

EP - 592

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 5

ER -