In-plane monotonic and cyclic racking load testing of structural insulated panels

Stefanie Terentiuk, Ali M. Memari

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract Structural insulated panel (SIP) wall systems have been used in residential and light commercial buildings for the past 60 years. Lack of sufficient published research results on racking load performance and understanding of the influence of fastener types on seismic response has been a deterrent in the widespread use of the wall system in seismically active areas. This paper summarizes the results of a full-scale racking load testing study in which a total of 17 2.4×2.4-m (8×8-ft) SIP wall panels were tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. Four 114-mm (4.5-in.) thick SIP specimens were tested under monotonic loading, while 13 114-mm (4.5-in.) thick SIP specimens were tested under the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering loading protocol. Parameters such as fastener type, spline design, hold-down anchor location, and sheathing bearing were adjusted throughout the testing to determine their effects on the SIP's performance. Performance parameters such as peak load and displacement and allowable drift load capacity were determined for all of the SIP specimens. The paper describes the mode of failure for typical specimens under both monotonic and cyclic loading and presents load-displacement data for the tested specimens. The study showed that the fastener type (screw, staple, or nail) was the parameter that had the greatest effect on the performance of the specimen. The SIP specimens that used 8d common nails to connect the framing to the sheathing are shown to be the most effective SIP design in terms of load capacity and resistance under repeated cyclic loading.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-275
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Architectural Engineering
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Load testing
Cyclic loads
Fasteners
Nails
Bearings (structural)
Seismic response
Anchors
Splines
Testing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Architecture
  • Building and Construction
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

@article{b3a6327b57d4471d9ca4e20fb3cd47e4,
title = "In-plane monotonic and cyclic racking load testing of structural insulated panels",
abstract = "Abstract Structural insulated panel (SIP) wall systems have been used in residential and light commercial buildings for the past 60 years. Lack of sufficient published research results on racking load performance and understanding of the influence of fastener types on seismic response has been a deterrent in the widespread use of the wall system in seismically active areas. This paper summarizes the results of a full-scale racking load testing study in which a total of 17 2.4×2.4-m (8×8-ft) SIP wall panels were tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. Four 114-mm (4.5-in.) thick SIP specimens were tested under monotonic loading, while 13 114-mm (4.5-in.) thick SIP specimens were tested under the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering loading protocol. Parameters such as fastener type, spline design, hold-down anchor location, and sheathing bearing were adjusted throughout the testing to determine their effects on the SIP's performance. Performance parameters such as peak load and displacement and allowable drift load capacity were determined for all of the SIP specimens. The paper describes the mode of failure for typical specimens under both monotonic and cyclic loading and presents load-displacement data for the tested specimens. The study showed that the fastener type (screw, staple, or nail) was the parameter that had the greatest effect on the performance of the specimen. The SIP specimens that used 8d common nails to connect the framing to the sheathing are shown to be the most effective SIP design in terms of load capacity and resistance under repeated cyclic loading.",
author = "Stefanie Terentiuk and Memari, {Ali M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000084",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "261--275",
journal = "Journal of Architectural Engineering",
issn = "1076-0431",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

In-plane monotonic and cyclic racking load testing of structural insulated panels. / Terentiuk, Stefanie; Memari, Ali M.

In: Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 261-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - In-plane monotonic and cyclic racking load testing of structural insulated panels

AU - Terentiuk, Stefanie

AU - Memari, Ali M.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Abstract Structural insulated panel (SIP) wall systems have been used in residential and light commercial buildings for the past 60 years. Lack of sufficient published research results on racking load performance and understanding of the influence of fastener types on seismic response has been a deterrent in the widespread use of the wall system in seismically active areas. This paper summarizes the results of a full-scale racking load testing study in which a total of 17 2.4×2.4-m (8×8-ft) SIP wall panels were tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. Four 114-mm (4.5-in.) thick SIP specimens were tested under monotonic loading, while 13 114-mm (4.5-in.) thick SIP specimens were tested under the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering loading protocol. Parameters such as fastener type, spline design, hold-down anchor location, and sheathing bearing were adjusted throughout the testing to determine their effects on the SIP's performance. Performance parameters such as peak load and displacement and allowable drift load capacity were determined for all of the SIP specimens. The paper describes the mode of failure for typical specimens under both monotonic and cyclic loading and presents load-displacement data for the tested specimens. The study showed that the fastener type (screw, staple, or nail) was the parameter that had the greatest effect on the performance of the specimen. The SIP specimens that used 8d common nails to connect the framing to the sheathing are shown to be the most effective SIP design in terms of load capacity and resistance under repeated cyclic loading.

AB - Abstract Structural insulated panel (SIP) wall systems have been used in residential and light commercial buildings for the past 60 years. Lack of sufficient published research results on racking load performance and understanding of the influence of fastener types on seismic response has been a deterrent in the widespread use of the wall system in seismically active areas. This paper summarizes the results of a full-scale racking load testing study in which a total of 17 2.4×2.4-m (8×8-ft) SIP wall panels were tested under monotonic and cyclic loading. Four 114-mm (4.5-in.) thick SIP specimens were tested under monotonic loading, while 13 114-mm (4.5-in.) thick SIP specimens were tested under the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering loading protocol. Parameters such as fastener type, spline design, hold-down anchor location, and sheathing bearing were adjusted throughout the testing to determine their effects on the SIP's performance. Performance parameters such as peak load and displacement and allowable drift load capacity were determined for all of the SIP specimens. The paper describes the mode of failure for typical specimens under both monotonic and cyclic loading and presents load-displacement data for the tested specimens. The study showed that the fastener type (screw, staple, or nail) was the parameter that had the greatest effect on the performance of the specimen. The SIP specimens that used 8d common nails to connect the framing to the sheathing are shown to be the most effective SIP design in terms of load capacity and resistance under repeated cyclic loading.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870922087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870922087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000084

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000084

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84870922087

VL - 18

SP - 261

EP - 275

JO - Journal of Architectural Engineering

JF - Journal of Architectural Engineering

SN - 1076-0431

IS - 4

ER -