Inaccuracies in the Assessment of Femoral Anteversion in Proximal Femoral Replacement Prostheses

Richard D. Lackman, Jesse T. Torbert, Joseph L. Finstein, Christian M. Ogilvie, Edward Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurately judging anteversion of proximal femoral replacement prostheses (PFRPs) during insertion can be difficult and may affect performance/stability. We designed a gravity goniometer jig, which attaches directly to the prosthesis, to improve rotational placement. Our hypotheses were that surgeons cannot accurately estimate anteversion in the context of a PFRP and that our jig would improve rotational placement. In our model, a 15-centimeter PFRP was placed in a saw-bones femur set in a lateral position. The prosthesis could rotate into anteversion/retroversion while the femur was fixed. Orthopedic residents and surgeons made 2 attempts to place the prosthesis into 15° of anteversion; first without, then with the jig. Each attempt was recorded by photograph and angle-measuring jig. Nineteen surgeons and 28 residents participated. Without the jig, the mean PFRP anteversion was 18.3° (range, 1°-50.5°; SD, 9.6) compared to 14.3° (range, 12.5°-15.5°; SD, 0.7) using the jig (P = .006). Without a jig, the mean anteversion of resident-placed endoprosthesis was 18.4° (range, 3°-36°; SD, 8.1) compared to 18.1° (range, 1°-50.5°; SD, 12.1) (P = .91) recorded for attending physicians. The angle measurements from the jig and photographs were statistically equal. The placement of the PFRP into proper anteversion was more accurate with the aid of the jig. Simple jigs, such as the one developed for this study, may improve rotational placement of PFRPs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-101
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Thigh
Prostheses and Implants
Femur
Gravitation
Physicians
Bone and Bones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Lackman, Richard D. ; Torbert, Jesse T. ; Finstein, Joseph L. ; Ogilvie, Christian M. ; Fox, Edward. / Inaccuracies in the Assessment of Femoral Anteversion in Proximal Femoral Replacement Prostheses. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 97-101.
@article{a58fbc255da640a287d51fe7c542363b,
title = "Inaccuracies in the Assessment of Femoral Anteversion in Proximal Femoral Replacement Prostheses",
abstract = "Accurately judging anteversion of proximal femoral replacement prostheses (PFRPs) during insertion can be difficult and may affect performance/stability. We designed a gravity goniometer jig, which attaches directly to the prosthesis, to improve rotational placement. Our hypotheses were that surgeons cannot accurately estimate anteversion in the context of a PFRP and that our jig would improve rotational placement. In our model, a 15-centimeter PFRP was placed in a saw-bones femur set in a lateral position. The prosthesis could rotate into anteversion/retroversion while the femur was fixed. Orthopedic residents and surgeons made 2 attempts to place the prosthesis into 15° of anteversion; first without, then with the jig. Each attempt was recorded by photograph and angle-measuring jig. Nineteen surgeons and 28 residents participated. Without the jig, the mean PFRP anteversion was 18.3° (range, 1°-50.5°; SD, 9.6) compared to 14.3° (range, 12.5°-15.5°; SD, 0.7) using the jig (P = .006). Without a jig, the mean anteversion of resident-placed endoprosthesis was 18.4° (range, 3°-36°; SD, 8.1) compared to 18.1° (range, 1°-50.5°; SD, 12.1) (P = .91) recorded for attending physicians. The angle measurements from the jig and photographs were statistically equal. The placement of the PFRP into proper anteversion was more accurate with the aid of the jig. Simple jigs, such as the one developed for this study, may improve rotational placement of PFRPs.",
author = "Lackman, {Richard D.} and Torbert, {Jesse T.} and Finstein, {Joseph L.} and Ogilvie, {Christian M.} and Edward Fox",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "97--101",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "1",

}

Inaccuracies in the Assessment of Femoral Anteversion in Proximal Femoral Replacement Prostheses. / Lackman, Richard D.; Torbert, Jesse T.; Finstein, Joseph L.; Ogilvie, Christian M.; Fox, Edward.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 97-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inaccuracies in the Assessment of Femoral Anteversion in Proximal Femoral Replacement Prostheses

AU - Lackman, Richard D.

AU - Torbert, Jesse T.

AU - Finstein, Joseph L.

AU - Ogilvie, Christian M.

AU - Fox, Edward

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Accurately judging anteversion of proximal femoral replacement prostheses (PFRPs) during insertion can be difficult and may affect performance/stability. We designed a gravity goniometer jig, which attaches directly to the prosthesis, to improve rotational placement. Our hypotheses were that surgeons cannot accurately estimate anteversion in the context of a PFRP and that our jig would improve rotational placement. In our model, a 15-centimeter PFRP was placed in a saw-bones femur set in a lateral position. The prosthesis could rotate into anteversion/retroversion while the femur was fixed. Orthopedic residents and surgeons made 2 attempts to place the prosthesis into 15° of anteversion; first without, then with the jig. Each attempt was recorded by photograph and angle-measuring jig. Nineteen surgeons and 28 residents participated. Without the jig, the mean PFRP anteversion was 18.3° (range, 1°-50.5°; SD, 9.6) compared to 14.3° (range, 12.5°-15.5°; SD, 0.7) using the jig (P = .006). Without a jig, the mean anteversion of resident-placed endoprosthesis was 18.4° (range, 3°-36°; SD, 8.1) compared to 18.1° (range, 1°-50.5°; SD, 12.1) (P = .91) recorded for attending physicians. The angle measurements from the jig and photographs were statistically equal. The placement of the PFRP into proper anteversion was more accurate with the aid of the jig. Simple jigs, such as the one developed for this study, may improve rotational placement of PFRPs.

AB - Accurately judging anteversion of proximal femoral replacement prostheses (PFRPs) during insertion can be difficult and may affect performance/stability. We designed a gravity goniometer jig, which attaches directly to the prosthesis, to improve rotational placement. Our hypotheses were that surgeons cannot accurately estimate anteversion in the context of a PFRP and that our jig would improve rotational placement. In our model, a 15-centimeter PFRP was placed in a saw-bones femur set in a lateral position. The prosthesis could rotate into anteversion/retroversion while the femur was fixed. Orthopedic residents and surgeons made 2 attempts to place the prosthesis into 15° of anteversion; first without, then with the jig. Each attempt was recorded by photograph and angle-measuring jig. Nineteen surgeons and 28 residents participated. Without the jig, the mean PFRP anteversion was 18.3° (range, 1°-50.5°; SD, 9.6) compared to 14.3° (range, 12.5°-15.5°; SD, 0.7) using the jig (P = .006). Without a jig, the mean anteversion of resident-placed endoprosthesis was 18.4° (range, 3°-36°; SD, 8.1) compared to 18.1° (range, 1°-50.5°; SD, 12.1) (P = .91) recorded for attending physicians. The angle measurements from the jig and photographs were statistically equal. The placement of the PFRP into proper anteversion was more accurate with the aid of the jig. Simple jigs, such as the one developed for this study, may improve rotational placement of PFRPs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37349038475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37349038475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.101

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.101

M3 - Article

C2 - 18165037

AN - SCOPUS:37349038475

VL - 23

SP - 97

EP - 101

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 1

ER -