TY - JOUR
T1 - Incidence of central line associated bloodstream infection following central venous catheter placement in the emergency department
AU - Inhofer, Joseph
AU - Bertasi, Anthony
AU - Gangidine, Matthew
AU - Repas, Steven J.
AU - Holmes, Jasmine
AU - Harris, Micah
AU - Stull, Madeline
AU - Marco, Catherine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Introduction: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are costly and can be lifethreatening. Many efforts have been taken to minimize the rates of infection, including sterile technique, pre-packaged sterile kits, site selection, and replacing infected or potentially infected lines. This study aims to identify the incidence of CLABSI following catheter placement in the ED, and to compare rates of CLABSI among ED and ICU placed catheters. Methods: This retrospective chart review was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Eligibility criteria included patients who had CVC placed in the ED or ICU from January 1st, 2018, through July 31st, 2019 who were 18 years or older. Results: Among 1810 patients with central lines, 1254 met eligibility criteria. There was no significant difference in infection rates when comparing lines placed in the ED (2.5 per 1000 catheter days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8 to 5.8) compared to those placed in the ICU (4.6 per 1000 catheter days, 95% CI 3.0 to 6.8). The odds of CLABSI was not associated with age, sex, indication, site, location nor which type of health care professional (HCP) placed the line. Conclusions: In this study, the incidence of infection was no different between lines placed in the ED compared to the ICU.
AB - Introduction: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are costly and can be lifethreatening. Many efforts have been taken to minimize the rates of infection, including sterile technique, pre-packaged sterile kits, site selection, and replacing infected or potentially infected lines. This study aims to identify the incidence of CLABSI following catheter placement in the ED, and to compare rates of CLABSI among ED and ICU placed catheters. Methods: This retrospective chart review was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Eligibility criteria included patients who had CVC placed in the ED or ICU from January 1st, 2018, through July 31st, 2019 who were 18 years or older. Results: Among 1810 patients with central lines, 1254 met eligibility criteria. There was no significant difference in infection rates when comparing lines placed in the ED (2.5 per 1000 catheter days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8 to 5.8) compared to those placed in the ICU (4.6 per 1000 catheter days, 95% CI 3.0 to 6.8). The odds of CLABSI was not associated with age, sex, indication, site, location nor which type of health care professional (HCP) placed the line. Conclusions: In this study, the incidence of infection was no different between lines placed in the ED compared to the ICU.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119319345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119319345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.018
DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 34808455
AN - SCOPUS:85119319345
SN - 0735-6757
VL - 51
SP - 338
EP - 341
JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
ER -