Incorporating bias error in calculating solar irradiance: Implications for crop yield simulations

A. Weiss, C. J. Hays, Q. Hu, W. E. Easterling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Solar irradiance is an important input parameter to many crop simulation models. It is not measured at the same spatial density as air temperature and precipitation, which has lead to the development of algorithms to calculate solar irradiance from air temperature and precipitation data. Fourteen algorithms were evaluated using 10 yr of measured air temperature, precipitation, and solar irradiance data from Mead, NE. All algorithms had similar root mean square errors (RMSE). When the bias error (the difference between measured and simulated values) was plotted against day of year, only one version of the algorithm showed a simple pattern not dependent on fitting a Fourier series to the data. This pattern of the bias error formed the basis for a correction factor that was applied to all calculations of solar irradiance. Using independent meteorological data from nine locations in eastern and western portions of Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota, the corrected algorithm developed from the Mead data calculated solar irradiance with RMSE ranging from 3.6 to 4.7 MJ m-2 d-1 Using the Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator, simulated yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were significantly different when using the measured and uncorrected solar irradiance; however, the yields were not significantly different when using the measured and modified solar irradiance. Using this modification, solar irradiance measured at one location can be used to calculate solar irradiance at locations up to 600 km away in the U.S. Great Plains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1321-1326
Number of pages6
JournalAgronomy Journal
Volume93
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001

Fingerprint

crop yield
solar radiation
mead
air temperature
Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator
crop models
meteorological data
Glycine max
simulation models
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
soybeans
wheat
corn

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

@article{b8b6cf35867a45fd8a2eff4efb1e7bd3,
title = "Incorporating bias error in calculating solar irradiance: Implications for crop yield simulations",
abstract = "Solar irradiance is an important input parameter to many crop simulation models. It is not measured at the same spatial density as air temperature and precipitation, which has lead to the development of algorithms to calculate solar irradiance from air temperature and precipitation data. Fourteen algorithms were evaluated using 10 yr of measured air temperature, precipitation, and solar irradiance data from Mead, NE. All algorithms had similar root mean square errors (RMSE). When the bias error (the difference between measured and simulated values) was plotted against day of year, only one version of the algorithm showed a simple pattern not dependent on fitting a Fourier series to the data. This pattern of the bias error formed the basis for a correction factor that was applied to all calculations of solar irradiance. Using independent meteorological data from nine locations in eastern and western portions of Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota, the corrected algorithm developed from the Mead data calculated solar irradiance with RMSE ranging from 3.6 to 4.7 MJ m-2 d-1 Using the Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator, simulated yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were significantly different when using the measured and uncorrected solar irradiance; however, the yields were not significantly different when using the measured and modified solar irradiance. Using this modification, solar irradiance measured at one location can be used to calculate solar irradiance at locations up to 600 km away in the U.S. Great Plains.",
author = "A. Weiss and Hays, {C. J.} and Q. Hu and Easterling, {W. E.}",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "1321--1326",
journal = "Agronomy Journal",
issn = "0002-1962",
publisher = "American Society of Agronomy",
number = "6",

}

Incorporating bias error in calculating solar irradiance : Implications for crop yield simulations. / Weiss, A.; Hays, C. J.; Hu, Q.; Easterling, W. E.

In: Agronomy Journal, Vol. 93, No. 6, 01.12.2001, p. 1321-1326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incorporating bias error in calculating solar irradiance

T2 - Implications for crop yield simulations

AU - Weiss, A.

AU - Hays, C. J.

AU - Hu, Q.

AU - Easterling, W. E.

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - Solar irradiance is an important input parameter to many crop simulation models. It is not measured at the same spatial density as air temperature and precipitation, which has lead to the development of algorithms to calculate solar irradiance from air temperature and precipitation data. Fourteen algorithms were evaluated using 10 yr of measured air temperature, precipitation, and solar irradiance data from Mead, NE. All algorithms had similar root mean square errors (RMSE). When the bias error (the difference between measured and simulated values) was plotted against day of year, only one version of the algorithm showed a simple pattern not dependent on fitting a Fourier series to the data. This pattern of the bias error formed the basis for a correction factor that was applied to all calculations of solar irradiance. Using independent meteorological data from nine locations in eastern and western portions of Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota, the corrected algorithm developed from the Mead data calculated solar irradiance with RMSE ranging from 3.6 to 4.7 MJ m-2 d-1 Using the Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator, simulated yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were significantly different when using the measured and uncorrected solar irradiance; however, the yields were not significantly different when using the measured and modified solar irradiance. Using this modification, solar irradiance measured at one location can be used to calculate solar irradiance at locations up to 600 km away in the U.S. Great Plains.

AB - Solar irradiance is an important input parameter to many crop simulation models. It is not measured at the same spatial density as air temperature and precipitation, which has lead to the development of algorithms to calculate solar irradiance from air temperature and precipitation data. Fourteen algorithms were evaluated using 10 yr of measured air temperature, precipitation, and solar irradiance data from Mead, NE. All algorithms had similar root mean square errors (RMSE). When the bias error (the difference between measured and simulated values) was plotted against day of year, only one version of the algorithm showed a simple pattern not dependent on fitting a Fourier series to the data. This pattern of the bias error formed the basis for a correction factor that was applied to all calculations of solar irradiance. Using independent meteorological data from nine locations in eastern and western portions of Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota, the corrected algorithm developed from the Mead data calculated solar irradiance with RMSE ranging from 3.6 to 4.7 MJ m-2 d-1 Using the Erosion Productivity Impact Calculator, simulated yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were significantly different when using the measured and uncorrected solar irradiance; however, the yields were not significantly different when using the measured and modified solar irradiance. Using this modification, solar irradiance measured at one location can be used to calculate solar irradiance at locations up to 600 km away in the U.S. Great Plains.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035665853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035665853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035665853

VL - 93

SP - 1321

EP - 1326

JO - Agronomy Journal

JF - Agronomy Journal

SN - 0002-1962

IS - 6

ER -