Incremental to radical ideas: paradigm-relatedness metrics for investigating ideation creativity and diversity

Eli M. Silk, Shanna R. Daly, Kathryn W. Jablokow, Seda McKilligan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Creativity and diversity are key components of success in idea generation, but each includes many dimensions. Paradigm-relatedness is an indicator of the style of creativity and diversity that has been overlooked often in assessing ideation. The goals for this study were to synthesize the literature on paradigm-relatedness, and develop and test alternative approaches for operationalizing paradigm-relatedness in ideation. The synthesis of the literature focused on reviewing both paradigm-relatedness theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches. Then, two alternative paradigm-relatedness metric approaches—category-based and component-based—were developed. Finally, ideation data was collected and coded to evaluate the reliability, ease of use, and potential applications of each approach. The category-based approach was a more reliable and faster way to code paradigm-relatedness, and so it may be more suited for research or evaluation at scale. In contrast, the component-based approach provided more explicit information on all aspects of paradigm-relatedness, but was more challenging to code reliably and more time-consuming. The component-based approach may be more suited to guiding smaller teams or individual designers in achieving paradigm-relatedness creativity and diversity. Neither approach was found to be universally ideal, and so consideration of the trade-offs is important in deciding which is most appropriate in a given situation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-49
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation
Volume7
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2019

Fingerprint

Creativity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{baff54e20aa94a9f8b586f5959859778,
title = "Incremental to radical ideas: paradigm-relatedness metrics for investigating ideation creativity and diversity",
abstract = "Creativity and diversity are key components of success in idea generation, but each includes many dimensions. Paradigm-relatedness is an indicator of the style of creativity and diversity that has been overlooked often in assessing ideation. The goals for this study were to synthesize the literature on paradigm-relatedness, and develop and test alternative approaches for operationalizing paradigm-relatedness in ideation. The synthesis of the literature focused on reviewing both paradigm-relatedness theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches. Then, two alternative paradigm-relatedness metric approaches—category-based and component-based—were developed. Finally, ideation data was collected and coded to evaluate the reliability, ease of use, and potential applications of each approach. The category-based approach was a more reliable and faster way to code paradigm-relatedness, and so it may be more suited for research or evaluation at scale. In contrast, the component-based approach provided more explicit information on all aspects of paradigm-relatedness, but was more challenging to code reliably and more time-consuming. The component-based approach may be more suited to guiding smaller teams or individual designers in achieving paradigm-relatedness creativity and diversity. Neither approach was found to be universally ideal, and so consideration of the trade-offs is important in deciding which is most appropriate in a given situation.",
author = "Silk, {Eli M.} and Daly, {Shanna R.} and Jablokow, {Kathryn W.} and Seda McKilligan",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/21650349.2018.1463177",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "30--49",
journal = "International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation",
issn = "2165-0349",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-2",

}

Incremental to radical ideas : paradigm-relatedness metrics for investigating ideation creativity and diversity. / Silk, Eli M.; Daly, Shanna R.; Jablokow, Kathryn W.; McKilligan, Seda.

In: International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 7, No. 1-2, 03.04.2019, p. 30-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incremental to radical ideas

T2 - paradigm-relatedness metrics for investigating ideation creativity and diversity

AU - Silk, Eli M.

AU - Daly, Shanna R.

AU - Jablokow, Kathryn W.

AU - McKilligan, Seda

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - Creativity and diversity are key components of success in idea generation, but each includes many dimensions. Paradigm-relatedness is an indicator of the style of creativity and diversity that has been overlooked often in assessing ideation. The goals for this study were to synthesize the literature on paradigm-relatedness, and develop and test alternative approaches for operationalizing paradigm-relatedness in ideation. The synthesis of the literature focused on reviewing both paradigm-relatedness theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches. Then, two alternative paradigm-relatedness metric approaches—category-based and component-based—were developed. Finally, ideation data was collected and coded to evaluate the reliability, ease of use, and potential applications of each approach. The category-based approach was a more reliable and faster way to code paradigm-relatedness, and so it may be more suited for research or evaluation at scale. In contrast, the component-based approach provided more explicit information on all aspects of paradigm-relatedness, but was more challenging to code reliably and more time-consuming. The component-based approach may be more suited to guiding smaller teams or individual designers in achieving paradigm-relatedness creativity and diversity. Neither approach was found to be universally ideal, and so consideration of the trade-offs is important in deciding which is most appropriate in a given situation.

AB - Creativity and diversity are key components of success in idea generation, but each includes many dimensions. Paradigm-relatedness is an indicator of the style of creativity and diversity that has been overlooked often in assessing ideation. The goals for this study were to synthesize the literature on paradigm-relatedness, and develop and test alternative approaches for operationalizing paradigm-relatedness in ideation. The synthesis of the literature focused on reviewing both paradigm-relatedness theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches. Then, two alternative paradigm-relatedness metric approaches—category-based and component-based—were developed. Finally, ideation data was collected and coded to evaluate the reliability, ease of use, and potential applications of each approach. The category-based approach was a more reliable and faster way to code paradigm-relatedness, and so it may be more suited for research or evaluation at scale. In contrast, the component-based approach provided more explicit information on all aspects of paradigm-relatedness, but was more challenging to code reliably and more time-consuming. The component-based approach may be more suited to guiding smaller teams or individual designers in achieving paradigm-relatedness creativity and diversity. Neither approach was found to be universally ideal, and so consideration of the trade-offs is important in deciding which is most appropriate in a given situation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046449525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046449525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21650349.2018.1463177

DO - 10.1080/21650349.2018.1463177

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046449525

VL - 7

SP - 30

EP - 49

JO - International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation

JF - International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation

SN - 2165-0349

IS - 1-2

ER -