Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering

A. Oschlies, H. Held, D. Keller, K. Keller, N. Mengis, M. Quaas, W. Rickels, H. Schmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selecting appropriate indicators is essential to aggregate the information provided by climate model outputs into a manageable set of relevant metrics on which assessments of climate engineering (CE) can be based. From all the variables potentially available from climate models, indicators need to be selected that are able to inform scientists and society on the development of the Earth system under CE, as well as on possible impacts and side effects of various ways of deploying CE or not. However, the indicators used so far have been largely identical to those used in climate change assessments and do not visibly reflect the fact that indicators for assessing CE (and thus the metrics composed of these indicators) may be different from those used to assess global warming. Until now, there has been little dedicated effort to identifying specific indicators and metrics for assessing CE. We here propose that such an effort should be facilitated by a more decision-oriented approach and an iterative procedure in close interaction between academia, decision makers, and stakeholders. Specifically, synergies and trade-offs between social objectives reflected by individual indicators, as well as decision-relevant uncertainties should be considered in the development of metrics, so that society can take informed decisions about climate policy measures under the impression of the options available, their likely effects and side effects, and the quality of the underlying knowledge base.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-58
Number of pages10
JournalEarth's Future
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

engineering
climate
climate modeling
indicator
environmental policy
global warming
stakeholder
climate change
decision
side effect
society

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Oschlies, A., Held, H., Keller, D., Keller, K., Mengis, N., Quaas, M., ... Schmidt, H. (2017). Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering. Earth's Future, 5(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000449
Oschlies, A. ; Held, H. ; Keller, D. ; Keller, K. ; Mengis, N. ; Quaas, M. ; Rickels, W. ; Schmidt, H. / Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering. In: Earth's Future. 2017 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 49-58.
@article{80ba378df01840b7886ec26bb98166bb,
title = "Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering",
abstract = "Selecting appropriate indicators is essential to aggregate the information provided by climate model outputs into a manageable set of relevant metrics on which assessments of climate engineering (CE) can be based. From all the variables potentially available from climate models, indicators need to be selected that are able to inform scientists and society on the development of the Earth system under CE, as well as on possible impacts and side effects of various ways of deploying CE or not. However, the indicators used so far have been largely identical to those used in climate change assessments and do not visibly reflect the fact that indicators for assessing CE (and thus the metrics composed of these indicators) may be different from those used to assess global warming. Until now, there has been little dedicated effort to identifying specific indicators and metrics for assessing CE. We here propose that such an effort should be facilitated by a more decision-oriented approach and an iterative procedure in close interaction between academia, decision makers, and stakeholders. Specifically, synergies and trade-offs between social objectives reflected by individual indicators, as well as decision-relevant uncertainties should be considered in the development of metrics, so that society can take informed decisions about climate policy measures under the impression of the options available, their likely effects and side effects, and the quality of the underlying knowledge base.",
author = "A. Oschlies and H. Held and D. Keller and K. Keller and N. Mengis and M. Quaas and W. Rickels and H. Schmidt",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/2016EF000449",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "49--58",
journal = "Earth's Future",
issn = "2328-4277",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Oschlies, A, Held, H, Keller, D, Keller, K, Mengis, N, Quaas, M, Rickels, W & Schmidt, H 2017, 'Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering', Earth's Future, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000449

Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering. / Oschlies, A.; Held, H.; Keller, D.; Keller, K.; Mengis, N.; Quaas, M.; Rickels, W.; Schmidt, H.

In: Earth's Future, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 49-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indicators and metrics for the assessment of climate engineering

AU - Oschlies, A.

AU - Held, H.

AU - Keller, D.

AU - Keller, K.

AU - Mengis, N.

AU - Quaas, M.

AU - Rickels, W.

AU - Schmidt, H.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Selecting appropriate indicators is essential to aggregate the information provided by climate model outputs into a manageable set of relevant metrics on which assessments of climate engineering (CE) can be based. From all the variables potentially available from climate models, indicators need to be selected that are able to inform scientists and society on the development of the Earth system under CE, as well as on possible impacts and side effects of various ways of deploying CE or not. However, the indicators used so far have been largely identical to those used in climate change assessments and do not visibly reflect the fact that indicators for assessing CE (and thus the metrics composed of these indicators) may be different from those used to assess global warming. Until now, there has been little dedicated effort to identifying specific indicators and metrics for assessing CE. We here propose that such an effort should be facilitated by a more decision-oriented approach and an iterative procedure in close interaction between academia, decision makers, and stakeholders. Specifically, synergies and trade-offs between social objectives reflected by individual indicators, as well as decision-relevant uncertainties should be considered in the development of metrics, so that society can take informed decisions about climate policy measures under the impression of the options available, their likely effects and side effects, and the quality of the underlying knowledge base.

AB - Selecting appropriate indicators is essential to aggregate the information provided by climate model outputs into a manageable set of relevant metrics on which assessments of climate engineering (CE) can be based. From all the variables potentially available from climate models, indicators need to be selected that are able to inform scientists and society on the development of the Earth system under CE, as well as on possible impacts and side effects of various ways of deploying CE or not. However, the indicators used so far have been largely identical to those used in climate change assessments and do not visibly reflect the fact that indicators for assessing CE (and thus the metrics composed of these indicators) may be different from those used to assess global warming. Until now, there has been little dedicated effort to identifying specific indicators and metrics for assessing CE. We here propose that such an effort should be facilitated by a more decision-oriented approach and an iterative procedure in close interaction between academia, decision makers, and stakeholders. Specifically, synergies and trade-offs between social objectives reflected by individual indicators, as well as decision-relevant uncertainties should be considered in the development of metrics, so that society can take informed decisions about climate policy measures under the impression of the options available, their likely effects and side effects, and the quality of the underlying knowledge base.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010469776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010469776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2016EF000449

DO - 10.1002/2016EF000449

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85010469776

VL - 5

SP - 49

EP - 58

JO - Earth's Future

JF - Earth's Future

SN - 2328-4277

IS - 1

ER -