Individual differences in children's performance during an emotional Stroop task

A behavioral and electrophysiological study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two studies using the emotional Stroop with 11-year-old children were completed. In Study 1, children were assigned to either the "interference group" or the "facilitation group" based on their performance on the task. The interference group was slower to respond to emotion words (positive and negative) versus control words. The facilitation group was faster to respond to the emotion words. The groups were then compared on a set of cognitive, emotional, and social measures collected at ages 4, 7, and 11. The interference group showed greater signs of emotional and social, but not cognitive, maladjustment across time. Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1. In addition, event-related potentials (ERPs) were collected in Study 2. The ERP data replicated earlier traditional Stroop studies. In addition, positive and negative words showed differences in processing across components. In particular, negative words appeared to tax attentional and processing resources more than positive words.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-51
Number of pages19
JournalBrain and cognition
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Individuality
Emotions
Task Performance and Analysis
Individual Differences
Stroop
Emotion
Interference

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{9b4e9304726a4112ac7eeea1561c3b6c,
title = "Individual differences in children's performance during an emotional Stroop task: A behavioral and electrophysiological study",
abstract = "Two studies using the emotional Stroop with 11-year-old children were completed. In Study 1, children were assigned to either the {"}interference group{"} or the {"}facilitation group{"} based on their performance on the task. The interference group was slower to respond to emotion words (positive and negative) versus control words. The facilitation group was faster to respond to the emotion words. The groups were then compared on a set of cognitive, emotional, and social measures collected at ages 4, 7, and 11. The interference group showed greater signs of emotional and social, but not cognitive, maladjustment across time. Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1. In addition, event-related potentials (ERPs) were collected in Study 2. The ERP data replicated earlier traditional Stroop studies. In addition, positive and negative words showed differences in processing across components. In particular, negative words appeared to tax attentional and processing resources more than positive words.",
author = "Perez-Edgar, {Koraly Elisa} and Fox, {Nathan A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00007-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "33--51",
journal = "Brain and Cognition",
issn = "0278-2626",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Individual differences in children's performance during an emotional Stroop task : A behavioral and electrophysiological study. / Perez-Edgar, Koraly Elisa; Fox, Nathan A.

In: Brain and cognition, Vol. 52, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 33-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in children's performance during an emotional Stroop task

T2 - A behavioral and electrophysiological study

AU - Perez-Edgar, Koraly Elisa

AU - Fox, Nathan A.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Two studies using the emotional Stroop with 11-year-old children were completed. In Study 1, children were assigned to either the "interference group" or the "facilitation group" based on their performance on the task. The interference group was slower to respond to emotion words (positive and negative) versus control words. The facilitation group was faster to respond to the emotion words. The groups were then compared on a set of cognitive, emotional, and social measures collected at ages 4, 7, and 11. The interference group showed greater signs of emotional and social, but not cognitive, maladjustment across time. Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1. In addition, event-related potentials (ERPs) were collected in Study 2. The ERP data replicated earlier traditional Stroop studies. In addition, positive and negative words showed differences in processing across components. In particular, negative words appeared to tax attentional and processing resources more than positive words.

AB - Two studies using the emotional Stroop with 11-year-old children were completed. In Study 1, children were assigned to either the "interference group" or the "facilitation group" based on their performance on the task. The interference group was slower to respond to emotion words (positive and negative) versus control words. The facilitation group was faster to respond to the emotion words. The groups were then compared on a set of cognitive, emotional, and social measures collected at ages 4, 7, and 11. The interference group showed greater signs of emotional and social, but not cognitive, maladjustment across time. Study 2 replicated the findings of Study 1. In addition, event-related potentials (ERPs) were collected in Study 2. The ERP data replicated earlier traditional Stroop studies. In addition, positive and negative words showed differences in processing across components. In particular, negative words appeared to tax attentional and processing resources more than positive words.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037940024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037940024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00007-1

DO - 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00007-1

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 33

EP - 51

JO - Brain and Cognition

JF - Brain and Cognition

SN - 0278-2626

IS - 1

ER -