Abstract
A survey concerning the treatment of persons with mental retardation accused of a crime was mailed to 54 attorneys general of the states and territories of the United States. Forty-six usable responses were received. Respondents were asked to provide information in three areas: identification, protections before/during trial, and protections and services after conviction and during imprisonment. Responses indicated that, with few exceptions, identification of persons with mental retardation in criminal justice is neither systematic nor probable. Most protections lie in statutes pertaining to mental illness rather than mental retardation. Furthermore, the criminal justice system appears to have adopted an informal inconsistent and inequitable response to the problems of individuals with mental retardation who are accused of a crime.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-12 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Mental Retardation |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1988 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Education
- Rehabilitation
- Health Professions(all)
Cite this
}
Individuals with mental retardation and the criminal justice system : The view from States' attorneys general. / McAfee, James Kenneth; Gural, M.
In: Mental Retardation, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.1988, p. 5-12.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Individuals with mental retardation and the criminal justice system
T2 - The view from States' attorneys general
AU - McAfee, James Kenneth
AU - Gural, M.
PY - 1988/1/1
Y1 - 1988/1/1
N2 - A survey concerning the treatment of persons with mental retardation accused of a crime was mailed to 54 attorneys general of the states and territories of the United States. Forty-six usable responses were received. Respondents were asked to provide information in three areas: identification, protections before/during trial, and protections and services after conviction and during imprisonment. Responses indicated that, with few exceptions, identification of persons with mental retardation in criminal justice is neither systematic nor probable. Most protections lie in statutes pertaining to mental illness rather than mental retardation. Furthermore, the criminal justice system appears to have adopted an informal inconsistent and inequitable response to the problems of individuals with mental retardation who are accused of a crime.
AB - A survey concerning the treatment of persons with mental retardation accused of a crime was mailed to 54 attorneys general of the states and territories of the United States. Forty-six usable responses were received. Respondents were asked to provide information in three areas: identification, protections before/during trial, and protections and services after conviction and during imprisonment. Responses indicated that, with few exceptions, identification of persons with mental retardation in criminal justice is neither systematic nor probable. Most protections lie in statutes pertaining to mental illness rather than mental retardation. Furthermore, the criminal justice system appears to have adopted an informal inconsistent and inequitable response to the problems of individuals with mental retardation who are accused of a crime.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023838047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023838047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 3343929
AN - SCOPUS:0023838047
VL - 26
SP - 5
EP - 12
JO - Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
JF - Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
SN - 1934-9491
IS - 1
ER -