Industry perceptions of university-industry relationships related to agricultural biotechnology research

Leland Luther Glenna, Rick Welsh, William B. Lacy, Dina Biscotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following a rise in university-industry relationships (UIRs), scholars began questioning the efficacy of those relationships, as well as whether industry and university research interests and integrity are being compromised. Although many of these studies focus on the university, few examine the perspectives of industry participants. We conducted intensive interviews with 63 managers and scientists at agricultural biotechnology companies involved in UIRs related to agricultural biotechnology. Our analysis of their comments reveals nuanced critical perspectives of UIRs and creative ideas for reforming policies and practices. Industry representatives listed many advantages of UIRs, but some also expressed an interest in reforming policies to preserve a public-interest emphasis for university research. We conclude by considering the structural relationships that may explain the industry representatives' critical evaluations and by identifying policy implications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)608-631
Number of pages24
JournalRural Sociology
Volume72
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

biotechnology
industry
university
university research
industry research
research interest
public interest
integrity
manager
interview
evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Glenna, Leland Luther ; Welsh, Rick ; Lacy, William B. ; Biscotti, Dina. / Industry perceptions of university-industry relationships related to agricultural biotechnology research. In: Rural Sociology. 2007 ; Vol. 72, No. 4. pp. 608-631.
@article{b83c0f9668664d5eb26603b10db49d2b,
title = "Industry perceptions of university-industry relationships related to agricultural biotechnology research",
abstract = "Following a rise in university-industry relationships (UIRs), scholars began questioning the efficacy of those relationships, as well as whether industry and university research interests and integrity are being compromised. Although many of these studies focus on the university, few examine the perspectives of industry participants. We conducted intensive interviews with 63 managers and scientists at agricultural biotechnology companies involved in UIRs related to agricultural biotechnology. Our analysis of their comments reveals nuanced critical perspectives of UIRs and creative ideas for reforming policies and practices. Industry representatives listed many advantages of UIRs, but some also expressed an interest in reforming policies to preserve a public-interest emphasis for university research. We conclude by considering the structural relationships that may explain the industry representatives' critical evaluations and by identifying policy implications.",
author = "Glenna, {Leland Luther} and Rick Welsh and Lacy, {William B.} and Dina Biscotti",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1526/003601107782638657",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "608--631",
journal = "Rural Sociology",
issn = "0036-0112",
publisher = "Rural Sociological Society",
number = "4",

}

Industry perceptions of university-industry relationships related to agricultural biotechnology research. / Glenna, Leland Luther; Welsh, Rick; Lacy, William B.; Biscotti, Dina.

In: Rural Sociology, Vol. 72, No. 4, 01.12.2007, p. 608-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Industry perceptions of university-industry relationships related to agricultural biotechnology research

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Welsh, Rick

AU - Lacy, William B.

AU - Biscotti, Dina

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Following a rise in university-industry relationships (UIRs), scholars began questioning the efficacy of those relationships, as well as whether industry and university research interests and integrity are being compromised. Although many of these studies focus on the university, few examine the perspectives of industry participants. We conducted intensive interviews with 63 managers and scientists at agricultural biotechnology companies involved in UIRs related to agricultural biotechnology. Our analysis of their comments reveals nuanced critical perspectives of UIRs and creative ideas for reforming policies and practices. Industry representatives listed many advantages of UIRs, but some also expressed an interest in reforming policies to preserve a public-interest emphasis for university research. We conclude by considering the structural relationships that may explain the industry representatives' critical evaluations and by identifying policy implications.

AB - Following a rise in university-industry relationships (UIRs), scholars began questioning the efficacy of those relationships, as well as whether industry and university research interests and integrity are being compromised. Although many of these studies focus on the university, few examine the perspectives of industry participants. We conducted intensive interviews with 63 managers and scientists at agricultural biotechnology companies involved in UIRs related to agricultural biotechnology. Our analysis of their comments reveals nuanced critical perspectives of UIRs and creative ideas for reforming policies and practices. Industry representatives listed many advantages of UIRs, but some also expressed an interest in reforming policies to preserve a public-interest emphasis for university research. We conclude by considering the structural relationships that may explain the industry representatives' critical evaluations and by identifying policy implications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37148999650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37148999650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1526/003601107782638657

DO - 10.1526/003601107782638657

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 608

EP - 631

JO - Rural Sociology

JF - Rural Sociology

SN - 0036-0112

IS - 4

ER -