Infanticide and the juries in France, 1825-1913

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Through the use of court statistics published by the Ministry of Justice and the observations of contemporaries this study examines the changing behavior of French juries toward persons accused of infanticide in the era from 1825 to 1913. From the beginning of this period the juries were lenient toward mothers accused of infanticide, most of whom were poor, unwed rural women whose seducers the jurymen often appear to have felt unjustly escaped from responsibility. Moreover, toward the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth, the acquittal rate for infanticide rose sharply, despite the state's increasing determination to fight child abuse and the rise of a repopulationist movement. This trend was related to the growing leniency of the jurymen toward accused female criminals in general, and also possibly to the feminist campaign against the male sexual irresponsibility allowed by the French civil code's ban on paternity suits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-176
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Family History
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

accused
France
civil code
ban
ministry
nineteenth century
abuse
campaign
justice
statistics
responsibility
human being
trend
Juries
Infanticide

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{c2b70e31f5b24bbe8cda48b53f0024f6,
title = "Infanticide and the juries in France, 1825-1913",
abstract = "Through the use of court statistics published by the Ministry of Justice and the observations of contemporaries this study examines the changing behavior of French juries toward persons accused of infanticide in the era from 1825 to 1913. From the beginning of this period the juries were lenient toward mothers accused of infanticide, most of whom were poor, unwed rural women whose seducers the jurymen often appear to have felt unjustly escaped from responsibility. Moreover, toward the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth, the acquittal rate for infanticide rose sharply, despite the state's increasing determination to fight child abuse and the rise of a repopulationist movement. This trend was related to the growing leniency of the jurymen toward accused female criminals in general, and also possibly to the feminist campaign against the male sexual irresponsibility allowed by the French civil code's ban on paternity suits.",
author = "Donovan, {James M.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/036319909101600204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "157--176",
journal = "Journal of Family History",
issn = "0363-1990",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Infanticide and the juries in France, 1825-1913. / Donovan, James M.

In: Journal of Family History, Vol. 16, No. 2, 01.01.1991, p. 157-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infanticide and the juries in France, 1825-1913

AU - Donovan, James M.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Through the use of court statistics published by the Ministry of Justice and the observations of contemporaries this study examines the changing behavior of French juries toward persons accused of infanticide in the era from 1825 to 1913. From the beginning of this period the juries were lenient toward mothers accused of infanticide, most of whom were poor, unwed rural women whose seducers the jurymen often appear to have felt unjustly escaped from responsibility. Moreover, toward the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth, the acquittal rate for infanticide rose sharply, despite the state's increasing determination to fight child abuse and the rise of a repopulationist movement. This trend was related to the growing leniency of the jurymen toward accused female criminals in general, and also possibly to the feminist campaign against the male sexual irresponsibility allowed by the French civil code's ban on paternity suits.

AB - Through the use of court statistics published by the Ministry of Justice and the observations of contemporaries this study examines the changing behavior of French juries toward persons accused of infanticide in the era from 1825 to 1913. From the beginning of this period the juries were lenient toward mothers accused of infanticide, most of whom were poor, unwed rural women whose seducers the jurymen often appear to have felt unjustly escaped from responsibility. Moreover, toward the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth, the acquittal rate for infanticide rose sharply, despite the state's increasing determination to fight child abuse and the rise of a repopulationist movement. This trend was related to the growing leniency of the jurymen toward accused female criminals in general, and also possibly to the feminist campaign against the male sexual irresponsibility allowed by the French civil code's ban on paternity suits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025987762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025987762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/036319909101600204

DO - 10.1177/036319909101600204

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 157

EP - 176

JO - Journal of Family History

JF - Journal of Family History

SN - 0363-1990

IS - 2

ER -