22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is an increasing need for new methods and tools that support knowledge construction from complex geospatial datasets related to public health. This study is part of a larger effort to develop, implement, and test such methods and tools. To be successful, the design of methods and tools must be grounded in a solid understanding of the work practices within the domain of use; the research reported here focuses on developing that understanding. We adopted a user-centered approach to toolset design where we investigated the work of cancer researchers and used the results of that investigation as inputs into the development of design guidelines for new geovisualization and spatial analysis tools. Specifically, we conducted key informant interviews focused on use, or potential use, of geographic information, methods, and tools and complemented this with a systematic analysis of published, peer-reviewed articles on geospatial cancer research. Results were used to characterize the typical process of analysis, to identify fundamental differences between intensive users of geospatial methods and infrequent users, and to outline key stages in analysis and tasks within the stages that methods and tools must support. Our findings inform design and implementation decisions for visual and analytic tools that support cancer prevention and control research and they provide insight into the processes used by cancer researchers for addressing the challenges of geographic factors in public health research and policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)576-607
Number of pages32
JournalHealth and Place
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

cancer
Neoplasms
Research
public health
Public Health
Research Personnel
Geography
Spatial Analysis
Public Policy
Health Policy
spatial analysis
method
analysis
Guidelines
Interviews
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

@article{c46c3ddde3b744898e68bbdbf38e8354,
title = "Informing geospatial toolset design: Understanding the process of cancer data exploration and analysis",
abstract = "There is an increasing need for new methods and tools that support knowledge construction from complex geospatial datasets related to public health. This study is part of a larger effort to develop, implement, and test such methods and tools. To be successful, the design of methods and tools must be grounded in a solid understanding of the work practices within the domain of use; the research reported here focuses on developing that understanding. We adopted a user-centered approach to toolset design where we investigated the work of cancer researchers and used the results of that investigation as inputs into the development of design guidelines for new geovisualization and spatial analysis tools. Specifically, we conducted key informant interviews focused on use, or potential use, of geographic information, methods, and tools and complemented this with a systematic analysis of published, peer-reviewed articles on geospatial cancer research. Results were used to characterize the typical process of analysis, to identify fundamental differences between intensive users of geospatial methods and infrequent users, and to outline key stages in analysis and tasks within the stages that methods and tools must support. Our findings inform design and implementation decisions for visual and analytic tools that support cancer prevention and control research and they provide insight into the processes used by cancer researchers for addressing the challenges of geographic factors in public health research and policy.",
author = "Tanuka Bhowmick and Griffin, {Amy L.} and MacEachren, {Alan M.} and Kluhsman, {Brenda C.} and Lengerich, {Eugene J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "576--607",
journal = "Health and Place",
issn = "1353-8292",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

Informing geospatial toolset design : Understanding the process of cancer data exploration and analysis. / Bhowmick, Tanuka; Griffin, Amy L.; MacEachren, Alan M.; Kluhsman, Brenda C.; Lengerich, Eugene J.

In: Health and Place, Vol. 14, No. 3, 09.2008, p. 576-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informing geospatial toolset design

T2 - Understanding the process of cancer data exploration and analysis

AU - Bhowmick, Tanuka

AU - Griffin, Amy L.

AU - MacEachren, Alan M.

AU - Kluhsman, Brenda C.

AU - Lengerich, Eugene J.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - There is an increasing need for new methods and tools that support knowledge construction from complex geospatial datasets related to public health. This study is part of a larger effort to develop, implement, and test such methods and tools. To be successful, the design of methods and tools must be grounded in a solid understanding of the work practices within the domain of use; the research reported here focuses on developing that understanding. We adopted a user-centered approach to toolset design where we investigated the work of cancer researchers and used the results of that investigation as inputs into the development of design guidelines for new geovisualization and spatial analysis tools. Specifically, we conducted key informant interviews focused on use, or potential use, of geographic information, methods, and tools and complemented this with a systematic analysis of published, peer-reviewed articles on geospatial cancer research. Results were used to characterize the typical process of analysis, to identify fundamental differences between intensive users of geospatial methods and infrequent users, and to outline key stages in analysis and tasks within the stages that methods and tools must support. Our findings inform design and implementation decisions for visual and analytic tools that support cancer prevention and control research and they provide insight into the processes used by cancer researchers for addressing the challenges of geographic factors in public health research and policy.

AB - There is an increasing need for new methods and tools that support knowledge construction from complex geospatial datasets related to public health. This study is part of a larger effort to develop, implement, and test such methods and tools. To be successful, the design of methods and tools must be grounded in a solid understanding of the work practices within the domain of use; the research reported here focuses on developing that understanding. We adopted a user-centered approach to toolset design where we investigated the work of cancer researchers and used the results of that investigation as inputs into the development of design guidelines for new geovisualization and spatial analysis tools. Specifically, we conducted key informant interviews focused on use, or potential use, of geographic information, methods, and tools and complemented this with a systematic analysis of published, peer-reviewed articles on geospatial cancer research. Results were used to characterize the typical process of analysis, to identify fundamental differences between intensive users of geospatial methods and infrequent users, and to outline key stages in analysis and tasks within the stages that methods and tools must support. Our findings inform design and implementation decisions for visual and analytic tools that support cancer prevention and control research and they provide insight into the processes used by cancer researchers for addressing the challenges of geographic factors in public health research and policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149107763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149107763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 18060824

AN - SCOPUS:41149107763

VL - 14

SP - 576

EP - 607

JO - Health and Place

JF - Health and Place

SN - 1353-8292

IS - 3

ER -