Initial and Over-Time Effects of Fluency Interventions for Students With or At Risk for Disabilities

Paul Morgan, Georgios Sideridis, Youjia Hua

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors sought to (a) identify interventions that immediately increased the oral reading fluency of students with or at risk for disabilities, (b) estimate to what extent these gains maintained over time, and (c) evaluate whether particular characteristics of students (e.g., gender, disability status) predicted their response to fluency interventions. We used multilevel modeling to meta-analyze results from 44 single-participant studies involving 290 students. Results indicated that goal setting immediately increased fluency, and this gain continued over time. Word-level training was largely ineffective. Students with some types of disabilities (i.e., those with behavioral disorders or autism) responded significantly less well to interventions targeting fluency than did students with other types of disabilities (i.e., those with learning disabilities or visual impairments) and so may require more intensive and individualized fluency interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-116
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012

Fingerprint

disability
Students
student
visual impairment
Learning Disorders
Vision Disorders
Autistic Disorder
autism
learning disability
Meta-Analysis
Reading
time
gender

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{962844b1de5f423b9509f21f6d8077eb,
title = "Initial and Over-Time Effects of Fluency Interventions for Students With or At Risk for Disabilities",
abstract = "The authors sought to (a) identify interventions that immediately increased the oral reading fluency of students with or at risk for disabilities, (b) estimate to what extent these gains maintained over time, and (c) evaluate whether particular characteristics of students (e.g., gender, disability status) predicted their response to fluency interventions. We used multilevel modeling to meta-analyze results from 44 single-participant studies involving 290 students. Results indicated that goal setting immediately increased fluency, and this gain continued over time. Word-level training was largely ineffective. Students with some types of disabilities (i.e., those with behavioral disorders or autism) responded significantly less well to interventions targeting fluency than did students with other types of disabilities (i.e., those with learning disabilities or visual impairments) and so may require more intensive and individualized fluency interventions.",
author = "Paul Morgan and Georgios Sideridis and Youjia Hua",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022466910398016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "94--116",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Initial and Over-Time Effects of Fluency Interventions for Students With or At Risk for Disabilities. / Morgan, Paul; Sideridis, Georgios; Hua, Youjia.

In: Journal of Special Education, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.08.2012, p. 94-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initial and Over-Time Effects of Fluency Interventions for Students With or At Risk for Disabilities

AU - Morgan, Paul

AU - Sideridis, Georgios

AU - Hua, Youjia

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - The authors sought to (a) identify interventions that immediately increased the oral reading fluency of students with or at risk for disabilities, (b) estimate to what extent these gains maintained over time, and (c) evaluate whether particular characteristics of students (e.g., gender, disability status) predicted their response to fluency interventions. We used multilevel modeling to meta-analyze results from 44 single-participant studies involving 290 students. Results indicated that goal setting immediately increased fluency, and this gain continued over time. Word-level training was largely ineffective. Students with some types of disabilities (i.e., those with behavioral disorders or autism) responded significantly less well to interventions targeting fluency than did students with other types of disabilities (i.e., those with learning disabilities or visual impairments) and so may require more intensive and individualized fluency interventions.

AB - The authors sought to (a) identify interventions that immediately increased the oral reading fluency of students with or at risk for disabilities, (b) estimate to what extent these gains maintained over time, and (c) evaluate whether particular characteristics of students (e.g., gender, disability status) predicted their response to fluency interventions. We used multilevel modeling to meta-analyze results from 44 single-participant studies involving 290 students. Results indicated that goal setting immediately increased fluency, and this gain continued over time. Word-level training was largely ineffective. Students with some types of disabilities (i.e., those with behavioral disorders or autism) responded significantly less well to interventions targeting fluency than did students with other types of disabilities (i.e., those with learning disabilities or visual impairments) and so may require more intensive and individualized fluency interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863192845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863192845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022466910398016

DO - 10.1177/0022466910398016

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 94

EP - 116

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 2

ER -