Inmate legal information requests analysis: Empirical data to inform library purchases in correctional institutions

Kimberli Kelmor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The introduction of legal content to Google Scholar made United States case law and law journal articles accessible to an unprecedented extent. With case law freely available and accurate bibliographic information for articles, could Google Scholar be accurate and complete enough for correctional institutions to forgo purchasing either print publications or fee-based services for these materials? This article empirically assesses whether Google Scholar can reliably answer the questions of inmates in a correctional facility, the Baltimore City Detention Center. As a comparison, the same questions are tested in Westlaw Correctional, a subscription database marketed to correctional institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-146
Number of pages12
JournalLegal Reference Services Quarterly
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2016

Fingerprint

search engine
correctional institution
purchase
case law
subscription
state law
fee
Law

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Cite this

@article{19e232caa02e4e2d941e89bf74532aef,
title = "Inmate legal information requests analysis: Empirical data to inform library purchases in correctional institutions",
abstract = "The introduction of legal content to Google Scholar made United States case law and law journal articles accessible to an unprecedented extent. With case law freely available and accurate bibliographic information for articles, could Google Scholar be accurate and complete enough for correctional institutions to forgo purchasing either print publications or fee-based services for these materials? This article empirically assesses whether Google Scholar can reliably answer the questions of inmates in a correctional facility, the Baltimore City Detention Center. As a comparison, the same questions are tested in Westlaw Correctional, a subscription database marketed to correctional institutions.",
author = "Kimberli Kelmor",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0270319X.2016.1177431",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "135--146",
journal = "Legal Reference Services Quarterly",
issn = "0270-319X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Inmate legal information requests analysis : Empirical data to inform library purchases in correctional institutions. / Kelmor, Kimberli.

In: Legal Reference Services Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 2, 02.04.2016, p. 135-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inmate legal information requests analysis

T2 - Empirical data to inform library purchases in correctional institutions

AU - Kelmor, Kimberli

PY - 2016/4/2

Y1 - 2016/4/2

N2 - The introduction of legal content to Google Scholar made United States case law and law journal articles accessible to an unprecedented extent. With case law freely available and accurate bibliographic information for articles, could Google Scholar be accurate and complete enough for correctional institutions to forgo purchasing either print publications or fee-based services for these materials? This article empirically assesses whether Google Scholar can reliably answer the questions of inmates in a correctional facility, the Baltimore City Detention Center. As a comparison, the same questions are tested in Westlaw Correctional, a subscription database marketed to correctional institutions.

AB - The introduction of legal content to Google Scholar made United States case law and law journal articles accessible to an unprecedented extent. With case law freely available and accurate bibliographic information for articles, could Google Scholar be accurate and complete enough for correctional institutions to forgo purchasing either print publications or fee-based services for these materials? This article empirically assesses whether Google Scholar can reliably answer the questions of inmates in a correctional facility, the Baltimore City Detention Center. As a comparison, the same questions are tested in Westlaw Correctional, a subscription database marketed to correctional institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969256062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969256062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0270319X.2016.1177431

DO - 10.1080/0270319X.2016.1177431

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84969256062

VL - 35

SP - 135

EP - 146

JO - Legal Reference Services Quarterly

JF - Legal Reference Services Quarterly

SN - 0270-319X

IS - 2

ER -