inmate society in the era of mass incarceration

Derek Allen Kreager, Candace Kruttschnitt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The origins and contours of inmate social organization were once central research areas that stalled just as incarceration rates dramatically climbed. In this review, we return to seminal works in this area and connect these with six interrelated changes to correctional contexts that accompanied mass incarceration. We argue that changes in prison racial, age, crowding, gender, offense type, and managerial characteristics potentially altered inmate informal organization and have yet to receive adequate criminological attention. We review the few recent studies that document contemporary inmate social life and call for increased researcher-practitioner partnerships that achieve mutual goals and embed criminologists within carceral settings. We suggest that network approaches are particularly useful for building on past qualitative and ethnographic insights to provide replicable results that are also easily conveyed to correctional authorities. As the era of mass incarceration peaks, we assert that the time is ripe for renewed interest in inmate society and its connections to prison stability, rehabilitation, and community reintegration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-310
Number of pages26
JournalAnnual Review of Criminology
Volume1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

correctional institution
organization
reintegration
rehabilitation
offense
gender
community
Society
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

@article{ac169524418a4b3889c8c1c58a175373,
title = "inmate society in the era of mass incarceration",
abstract = "The origins and contours of inmate social organization were once central research areas that stalled just as incarceration rates dramatically climbed. In this review, we return to seminal works in this area and connect these with six interrelated changes to correctional contexts that accompanied mass incarceration. We argue that changes in prison racial, age, crowding, gender, offense type, and managerial characteristics potentially altered inmate informal organization and have yet to receive adequate criminological attention. We review the few recent studies that document contemporary inmate social life and call for increased researcher-practitioner partnerships that achieve mutual goals and embed criminologists within carceral settings. We suggest that network approaches are particularly useful for building on past qualitative and ethnographic insights to provide replicable results that are also easily conveyed to correctional authorities. As the era of mass incarceration peaks, we assert that the time is ripe for renewed interest in inmate society and its connections to prison stability, rehabilitation, and community reintegration.",
author = "Kreager, {Derek Allen} and Candace Kruttschnitt",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092513",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "285--310",
journal = "Annual Review of Criminology",
issn = "2572-4568",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

inmate society in the era of mass incarceration. / Kreager, Derek Allen; Kruttschnitt, Candace.

In: Annual Review of Criminology, Vol. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 285-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - inmate society in the era of mass incarceration

AU - Kreager, Derek Allen

AU - Kruttschnitt, Candace

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The origins and contours of inmate social organization were once central research areas that stalled just as incarceration rates dramatically climbed. In this review, we return to seminal works in this area and connect these with six interrelated changes to correctional contexts that accompanied mass incarceration. We argue that changes in prison racial, age, crowding, gender, offense type, and managerial characteristics potentially altered inmate informal organization and have yet to receive adequate criminological attention. We review the few recent studies that document contemporary inmate social life and call for increased researcher-practitioner partnerships that achieve mutual goals and embed criminologists within carceral settings. We suggest that network approaches are particularly useful for building on past qualitative and ethnographic insights to provide replicable results that are also easily conveyed to correctional authorities. As the era of mass incarceration peaks, we assert that the time is ripe for renewed interest in inmate society and its connections to prison stability, rehabilitation, and community reintegration.

AB - The origins and contours of inmate social organization were once central research areas that stalled just as incarceration rates dramatically climbed. In this review, we return to seminal works in this area and connect these with six interrelated changes to correctional contexts that accompanied mass incarceration. We argue that changes in prison racial, age, crowding, gender, offense type, and managerial characteristics potentially altered inmate informal organization and have yet to receive adequate criminological attention. We review the few recent studies that document contemporary inmate social life and call for increased researcher-practitioner partnerships that achieve mutual goals and embed criminologists within carceral settings. We suggest that network approaches are particularly useful for building on past qualitative and ethnographic insights to provide replicable results that are also easily conveyed to correctional authorities. As the era of mass incarceration peaks, we assert that the time is ripe for renewed interest in inmate society and its connections to prison stability, rehabilitation, and community reintegration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049611016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049611016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092513

DO - 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092513

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29542738

AN - SCOPUS:85049611016

VL - 1

SP - 285

EP - 310

JO - Annual Review of Criminology

JF - Annual Review of Criminology

SN - 2572-4568

ER -