Insights on the use of decision-support tools to sustain forest ecosystems from a case study in Pennsylvania, USA

Joshua Rittenhouse, Laura P. Leites, Kelly Derham, Scott Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Decision-support models combine ecological understanding with utility considerations to evaluate potential results of management alternatives, thereby facilitating decision-making. They also provide a systematic, consistent, and rigorous framework for decision-making that is highly valuable for transparency in the management process. Despite the broad agreement on their importance, not many examples of organizations implementing their use at broad scale exist in the literature. Here we use the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry adoption and use of the SILVAH-Oak decision-support tool to guide management of mixed-oak forests as a case study to draw insights on managers' adherence to decision-support tool recommendations. Of 97 cases evaluated, 69% of the managers chose to follow the decision-support tool recommendation. We attribute this high adherence to the manager-centered development of the SILVAH-Oak tool. When managers did not follow recommendations, they cited reasons related to the tool's thresholds or considerations not accounted for by SILVAH-Oak. The delivery method was found to make a large difference in the level of adherence to the decision-support tool's recommendations. Case studies like this one provide unique opportunities to learn about the adoption of decision-support tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-395
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Forestry
Volume116
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 29 2018

Fingerprint

forest ecosystems
forest ecosystem
managers
case studies
Quercus
decision making
natural resources
forestry
transparency
decision
natural resource
oak
recommendation
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

@article{5dd14aed65b44a519cad0e539b322c55,
title = "Insights on the use of decision-support tools to sustain forest ecosystems from a case study in Pennsylvania, USA",
abstract = "Decision-support models combine ecological understanding with utility considerations to evaluate potential results of management alternatives, thereby facilitating decision-making. They also provide a systematic, consistent, and rigorous framework for decision-making that is highly valuable for transparency in the management process. Despite the broad agreement on their importance, not many examples of organizations implementing their use at broad scale exist in the literature. Here we use the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry adoption and use of the SILVAH-Oak decision-support tool to guide management of mixed-oak forests as a case study to draw insights on managers' adherence to decision-support tool recommendations. Of 97 cases evaluated, 69{\%} of the managers chose to follow the decision-support tool recommendation. We attribute this high adherence to the manager-centered development of the SILVAH-Oak tool. When managers did not follow recommendations, they cited reasons related to the tool's thresholds or considerations not accounted for by SILVAH-Oak. The delivery method was found to make a large difference in the level of adherence to the decision-support tool's recommendations. Case studies like this one provide unique opportunities to learn about the adoption of decision-support tools.",
author = "Joshua Rittenhouse and Leites, {Laura P.} and Kelly Derham and Scott Miller",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1093/jofore/fvy016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "391--395",
journal = "Journal of Forestry",
issn = "0022-1201",
publisher = "Society of American Foresters",
number = "4",

}

Insights on the use of decision-support tools to sustain forest ecosystems from a case study in Pennsylvania, USA. / Rittenhouse, Joshua; Leites, Laura P.; Derham, Kelly; Miller, Scott.

In: Journal of Forestry, Vol. 116, No. 4, 29.06.2018, p. 391-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insights on the use of decision-support tools to sustain forest ecosystems from a case study in Pennsylvania, USA

AU - Rittenhouse, Joshua

AU - Leites, Laura P.

AU - Derham, Kelly

AU - Miller, Scott

PY - 2018/6/29

Y1 - 2018/6/29

N2 - Decision-support models combine ecological understanding with utility considerations to evaluate potential results of management alternatives, thereby facilitating decision-making. They also provide a systematic, consistent, and rigorous framework for decision-making that is highly valuable for transparency in the management process. Despite the broad agreement on their importance, not many examples of organizations implementing their use at broad scale exist in the literature. Here we use the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry adoption and use of the SILVAH-Oak decision-support tool to guide management of mixed-oak forests as a case study to draw insights on managers' adherence to decision-support tool recommendations. Of 97 cases evaluated, 69% of the managers chose to follow the decision-support tool recommendation. We attribute this high adherence to the manager-centered development of the SILVAH-Oak tool. When managers did not follow recommendations, they cited reasons related to the tool's thresholds or considerations not accounted for by SILVAH-Oak. The delivery method was found to make a large difference in the level of adherence to the decision-support tool's recommendations. Case studies like this one provide unique opportunities to learn about the adoption of decision-support tools.

AB - Decision-support models combine ecological understanding with utility considerations to evaluate potential results of management alternatives, thereby facilitating decision-making. They also provide a systematic, consistent, and rigorous framework for decision-making that is highly valuable for transparency in the management process. Despite the broad agreement on their importance, not many examples of organizations implementing their use at broad scale exist in the literature. Here we use the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry adoption and use of the SILVAH-Oak decision-support tool to guide management of mixed-oak forests as a case study to draw insights on managers' adherence to decision-support tool recommendations. Of 97 cases evaluated, 69% of the managers chose to follow the decision-support tool recommendation. We attribute this high adherence to the manager-centered development of the SILVAH-Oak tool. When managers did not follow recommendations, they cited reasons related to the tool's thresholds or considerations not accounted for by SILVAH-Oak. The delivery method was found to make a large difference in the level of adherence to the decision-support tool's recommendations. Case studies like this one provide unique opportunities to learn about the adoption of decision-support tools.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049858491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049858491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jofore/fvy016

DO - 10.1093/jofore/fvy016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049858491

VL - 116

SP - 391

EP - 395

JO - Journal of Forestry

JF - Journal of Forestry

SN - 0022-1201

IS - 4

ER -