Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work

Charlene Zietsma, Thomas B. Lawrence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

351 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We draw on an in-depth longitudinal analysis of conflict over harvesting practices and decision authority in the British Columbia coastal forest industry to understand the role of institutional work in the transformation of organizational fields. We examine the work of actors to create, maintain, and disrupt the practices that are considered legitimate within a field (practice work) and the boundaries between sets of individuals and groups (boundary work), and the interplay of these two forms of institutional work in effecting change. We find that actors' boundary work and practice work operate in recursive configurations that underpin cycles of institutional innovation, conflict, stability, and restabilization. We also find that transitions between these cycles are triggered by combinations of three conditions: (1) the state of the boundaries, (2) the state of practices, and (3) the existence of actors with the capacity to undertake the boundary and practice work of a different institutional process. These findings contribute to untangling the paradox of embedded agency-how those subject to the institutions in a field can effect changes in them. We also contribute to an understanding of the processes and mechanisms that drive changes in the institutional lifecycle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-221
Number of pages33
JournalAdministrative science quarterly
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 17 2010

Fingerprint

Boundary Work
innovation
industry
Longitudinal Analysis
Authority
British Columbia
Innovation
Life Cycle
Coast
Paradox
Industry
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{e8a905b57ae14f1781fce305c29ae77e,
title = "Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work",
abstract = "We draw on an in-depth longitudinal analysis of conflict over harvesting practices and decision authority in the British Columbia coastal forest industry to understand the role of institutional work in the transformation of organizational fields. We examine the work of actors to create, maintain, and disrupt the practices that are considered legitimate within a field (practice work) and the boundaries between sets of individuals and groups (boundary work), and the interplay of these two forms of institutional work in effecting change. We find that actors' boundary work and practice work operate in recursive configurations that underpin cycles of institutional innovation, conflict, stability, and restabilization. We also find that transitions between these cycles are triggered by combinations of three conditions: (1) the state of the boundaries, (2) the state of practices, and (3) the existence of actors with the capacity to undertake the boundary and practice work of a different institutional process. These findings contribute to untangling the paradox of embedded agency-how those subject to the institutions in a field can effect changes in them. We also contribute to an understanding of the processes and mechanisms that drive changes in the institutional lifecycle.",
author = "Charlene Zietsma and Lawrence, {Thomas B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "17",
doi = "10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "189--221",
journal = "Administrative Science Quarterly",
issn = "0001-8392",
publisher = "Johnson School at Cornell University",
number = "2",

}

Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field : The interplay of boundary work and practice work. / Zietsma, Charlene; Lawrence, Thomas B.

In: Administrative science quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 2, 17.09.2010, p. 189-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field

T2 - The interplay of boundary work and practice work

AU - Zietsma, Charlene

AU - Lawrence, Thomas B.

PY - 2010/9/17

Y1 - 2010/9/17

N2 - We draw on an in-depth longitudinal analysis of conflict over harvesting practices and decision authority in the British Columbia coastal forest industry to understand the role of institutional work in the transformation of organizational fields. We examine the work of actors to create, maintain, and disrupt the practices that are considered legitimate within a field (practice work) and the boundaries between sets of individuals and groups (boundary work), and the interplay of these two forms of institutional work in effecting change. We find that actors' boundary work and practice work operate in recursive configurations that underpin cycles of institutional innovation, conflict, stability, and restabilization. We also find that transitions between these cycles are triggered by combinations of three conditions: (1) the state of the boundaries, (2) the state of practices, and (3) the existence of actors with the capacity to undertake the boundary and practice work of a different institutional process. These findings contribute to untangling the paradox of embedded agency-how those subject to the institutions in a field can effect changes in them. We also contribute to an understanding of the processes and mechanisms that drive changes in the institutional lifecycle.

AB - We draw on an in-depth longitudinal analysis of conflict over harvesting practices and decision authority in the British Columbia coastal forest industry to understand the role of institutional work in the transformation of organizational fields. We examine the work of actors to create, maintain, and disrupt the practices that are considered legitimate within a field (practice work) and the boundaries between sets of individuals and groups (boundary work), and the interplay of these two forms of institutional work in effecting change. We find that actors' boundary work and practice work operate in recursive configurations that underpin cycles of institutional innovation, conflict, stability, and restabilization. We also find that transitions between these cycles are triggered by combinations of three conditions: (1) the state of the boundaries, (2) the state of practices, and (3) the existence of actors with the capacity to undertake the boundary and practice work of a different institutional process. These findings contribute to untangling the paradox of embedded agency-how those subject to the institutions in a field can effect changes in them. We also contribute to an understanding of the processes and mechanisms that drive changes in the institutional lifecycle.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956520391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956520391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189

DO - 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956520391

VL - 55

SP - 189

EP - 221

JO - Administrative Science Quarterly

JF - Administrative Science Quarterly

SN - 0001-8392

IS - 2

ER -