Instruction-Dependent Muscle Activation Patterns Within a Two-Joint Synergy: Separating Mechanics From Neurophysiology

Mark Latash, Slobodan Jaric

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The following issue was addressed in the present study. Can instruction modify the involvement of different muscles when mechanical conditions and characteristics of a motor task remain unchanged? Subjects (N = 9) produced force by pressing their right hands against a fixed pad and were asked, in different trials, to predominantly use muscles that control either their elbows or their wrists. Force characteristics remained the same. In some trials, the setup was unexpectedly released so that a flexion movement occurred. Instruction changes induced changes in the muscle activation patterns and in preprogrammed reactions seen in unexpectedly released trials. The authors conclude that there may be different neurophysiological solutions to a specific mechanical task and that patterns of muscle activation may reflect features of both the explicit motor task and the subject's intention that may have no obvious mechanical correlate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-198
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of motor behavior
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1998

Fingerprint

Neurophysiology
Mechanics
Joints
Muscles
Elbow
Wrist
Hand

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{fe52dfaebcb54deba2bb14882b352124,
title = "Instruction-Dependent Muscle Activation Patterns Within a Two-Joint Synergy: Separating Mechanics From Neurophysiology",
abstract = "The following issue was addressed in the present study. Can instruction modify the involvement of different muscles when mechanical conditions and characteristics of a motor task remain unchanged? Subjects (N = 9) produced force by pressing their right hands against a fixed pad and were asked, in different trials, to predominantly use muscles that control either their elbows or their wrists. Force characteristics remained the same. In some trials, the setup was unexpectedly released so that a flexion movement occurred. Instruction changes induced changes in the muscle activation patterns and in preprogrammed reactions seen in unexpectedly released trials. The authors conclude that there may be different neurophysiological solutions to a specific mechanical task and that patterns of muscle activation may reflect features of both the explicit motor task and the subject's intention that may have no obvious mechanical correlate.",
author = "Mark Latash and Slobodan Jaric",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00222899809601336",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "194--198",
journal = "Journal of Motor Behavior",
issn = "0022-2895",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Instruction-Dependent Muscle Activation Patterns Within a Two-Joint Synergy : Separating Mechanics From Neurophysiology. / Latash, Mark; Jaric, Slobodan.

In: Journal of motor behavior, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.09.1998, p. 194-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Instruction-Dependent Muscle Activation Patterns Within a Two-Joint Synergy

T2 - Separating Mechanics From Neurophysiology

AU - Latash, Mark

AU - Jaric, Slobodan

PY - 1998/9/1

Y1 - 1998/9/1

N2 - The following issue was addressed in the present study. Can instruction modify the involvement of different muscles when mechanical conditions and characteristics of a motor task remain unchanged? Subjects (N = 9) produced force by pressing their right hands against a fixed pad and were asked, in different trials, to predominantly use muscles that control either their elbows or their wrists. Force characteristics remained the same. In some trials, the setup was unexpectedly released so that a flexion movement occurred. Instruction changes induced changes in the muscle activation patterns and in preprogrammed reactions seen in unexpectedly released trials. The authors conclude that there may be different neurophysiological solutions to a specific mechanical task and that patterns of muscle activation may reflect features of both the explicit motor task and the subject's intention that may have no obvious mechanical correlate.

AB - The following issue was addressed in the present study. Can instruction modify the involvement of different muscles when mechanical conditions and characteristics of a motor task remain unchanged? Subjects (N = 9) produced force by pressing their right hands against a fixed pad and were asked, in different trials, to predominantly use muscles that control either their elbows or their wrists. Force characteristics remained the same. In some trials, the setup was unexpectedly released so that a flexion movement occurred. Instruction changes induced changes in the muscle activation patterns and in preprogrammed reactions seen in unexpectedly released trials. The authors conclude that there may be different neurophysiological solutions to a specific mechanical task and that patterns of muscle activation may reflect features of both the explicit motor task and the subject's intention that may have no obvious mechanical correlate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031717122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031717122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00222899809601336

DO - 10.1080/00222899809601336

M3 - Article

C2 - 20037078

AN - SCOPUS:0031717122

VL - 30

SP - 194

EP - 198

JO - Journal of Motor Behavior

JF - Journal of Motor Behavior

SN - 0022-2895

IS - 3

ER -