Integrity's place among the character strengths of middle-level managers and top-level executives

William A. Gentry, Kristin L. Cullen, John J. Sosik, Jae Uk Chun, Christopher R. Leupold, Scott Tonidandel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One purpose of this study was to extend integrity research in organizations into the ranks of middle management. We therefore examined whether middle-level managers' behavioral manifestations of integrity related to ratings of their performance. Results of hierarchical regression analysis indicated that direct report ratings of a middle-level manager's integrity were positively related to boss ratings of that manager's performance. A second purpose of this study was to understand differences in integrity's relative importance to performance among other character strengths, and as a function of context (e.g., managerial level). We extend research in this area by showing, through relative weight analysis, that integrity was relatively less important to middle-level managers' current performance compared to other character strengths (e.g., social intelligence). In contrast, integrity was relatively more important for the performance of top-level executives - roles middle-level managers may hold in the future. Implications of these results for future research and practice as well as the current study's limitations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-404
Number of pages10
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013

Fingerprint

integrity
manager
Emotional Intelligence
Research
rating
performance
Regression Analysis
Weights and Measures
Integrity
Managers
intelligence
regression analysis
management
Rating

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Gentry, William A. ; Cullen, Kristin L. ; Sosik, John J. ; Chun, Jae Uk ; Leupold, Christopher R. ; Tonidandel, Scott. / Integrity's place among the character strengths of middle-level managers and top-level executives. In: Leadership Quarterly. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 395-404.
@article{7f4232633352479699832d972b07058f,
title = "Integrity's place among the character strengths of middle-level managers and top-level executives",
abstract = "One purpose of this study was to extend integrity research in organizations into the ranks of middle management. We therefore examined whether middle-level managers' behavioral manifestations of integrity related to ratings of their performance. Results of hierarchical regression analysis indicated that direct report ratings of a middle-level manager's integrity were positively related to boss ratings of that manager's performance. A second purpose of this study was to understand differences in integrity's relative importance to performance among other character strengths, and as a function of context (e.g., managerial level). We extend research in this area by showing, through relative weight analysis, that integrity was relatively less important to middle-level managers' current performance compared to other character strengths (e.g., social intelligence). In contrast, integrity was relatively more important for the performance of top-level executives - roles middle-level managers may hold in the future. Implications of these results for future research and practice as well as the current study's limitations are discussed.",
author = "Gentry, {William A.} and Cullen, {Kristin L.} and Sosik, {John J.} and Chun, {Jae Uk} and Leupold, {Christopher R.} and Scott Tonidandel",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "395--404",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Integrity's place among the character strengths of middle-level managers and top-level executives. / Gentry, William A.; Cullen, Kristin L.; Sosik, John J.; Chun, Jae Uk; Leupold, Christopher R.; Tonidandel, Scott.

In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.06.2013, p. 395-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrity's place among the character strengths of middle-level managers and top-level executives

AU - Gentry, William A.

AU - Cullen, Kristin L.

AU - Sosik, John J.

AU - Chun, Jae Uk

AU - Leupold, Christopher R.

AU - Tonidandel, Scott

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - One purpose of this study was to extend integrity research in organizations into the ranks of middle management. We therefore examined whether middle-level managers' behavioral manifestations of integrity related to ratings of their performance. Results of hierarchical regression analysis indicated that direct report ratings of a middle-level manager's integrity were positively related to boss ratings of that manager's performance. A second purpose of this study was to understand differences in integrity's relative importance to performance among other character strengths, and as a function of context (e.g., managerial level). We extend research in this area by showing, through relative weight analysis, that integrity was relatively less important to middle-level managers' current performance compared to other character strengths (e.g., social intelligence). In contrast, integrity was relatively more important for the performance of top-level executives - roles middle-level managers may hold in the future. Implications of these results for future research and practice as well as the current study's limitations are discussed.

AB - One purpose of this study was to extend integrity research in organizations into the ranks of middle management. We therefore examined whether middle-level managers' behavioral manifestations of integrity related to ratings of their performance. Results of hierarchical regression analysis indicated that direct report ratings of a middle-level manager's integrity were positively related to boss ratings of that manager's performance. A second purpose of this study was to understand differences in integrity's relative importance to performance among other character strengths, and as a function of context (e.g., managerial level). We extend research in this area by showing, through relative weight analysis, that integrity was relatively less important to middle-level managers' current performance compared to other character strengths (e.g., social intelligence). In contrast, integrity was relatively more important for the performance of top-level executives - roles middle-level managers may hold in the future. Implications of these results for future research and practice as well as the current study's limitations are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877834103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877834103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877834103

VL - 24

SP - 395

EP - 404

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 3

ER -