Intensive land restoration profoundly alters the spatial and seasonal patterns of deep soil water storage at watershed scales

Yali Zhao, Yunqiang Wang, Hui Sun, Hangsheng Lin, Zhao Jin, Meina He, Yunlong Yu, Weijian Zhou, Zhisheng An

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Soil-water storage (SWS)highly correlates with changes to land use and land restoration, and is an important variable for managing water resources and environmental restoration in water-limited terrestrial ecosystems. The Gully Land Consolidation project (GLC)was implemented in 2011 on the Chinese Loess Plateau and it may influence the spatial distribution and temporal variability of SWS at the watershed scale. However, there have been limited studies assessing the magnitude and pattern of such changes. We measured SWS to a depth of 5 m nine times over four seasons across two watersheds-one treated by the GLC project (GT-T, n = 89)and the other untreated (GT-U, n = 72). We then used correlation analysis, principle component analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, generalized linear model, and regression kriging to evaluate the seasonal variability, as well as spatial patterns, of SWS. Mean SWS in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter ranged from 830 to 934 mm in the GT-T watershed and from 681 to 771 mm in the GT-U watershed. Land use was the most important factor for predicting SWS in the two watersheds. After land management as a result of the GLC project, SWS exhibited different spatial patterns in the GT-T watershed compared with the GT-U watershed. Dynamics of SWS between adjacent seasons in the GT-U watershed displayed more variability than that in the GT-T watershed. In both watersheds, soil water volume (SWV, i.e., SWS per unit area × watershed area)declined from spring to summer (-3.9% in the GT-T and -13.4% in the GT-U), and increased from summer to autumn (11.7% in the GT-T and 20.7% in the GT-U). After the whole year, SWV displayed different degrees of increase in the two watersheds (10.6% in the GT-T, 2.7% in the GT-U)due to the effect of land restoration. The ratios of SWV in the gully land filled in the GT-T watershed to the SWV of the whole GT-T watershed for the four seasons ranged from 21.4–23.3%, with a mean value of 22%. Our results provide new insights regarding how human engineering of landscapes (as exemplified by GLC project)affect the spatial distribution of SWS and the dynamics of SWV storing capacity at the watershed scale. Understanding the dynamics of SWS/SWV between seasons is essential to evaluate, model and manage the soil water resources in human-affected watersheds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-141
Number of pages13
JournalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Volume280
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

soil water storage
land restoration
water storage
deep water
soil water
seasonal variation
watershed
gully
water resources
summer
land use
autumn
water resource
spatial distribution
environmental restoration
ergonomics
kriging
loess
project
land management

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Zhao, Yali ; Wang, Yunqiang ; Sun, Hui ; Lin, Hangsheng ; Jin, Zhao ; He, Meina ; Yu, Yunlong ; Zhou, Weijian ; An, Zhisheng. / Intensive land restoration profoundly alters the spatial and seasonal patterns of deep soil water storage at watershed scales. In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2019 ; Vol. 280. pp. 129-141.
@article{800b5651320541fd98240c8338f0892f,
title = "Intensive land restoration profoundly alters the spatial and seasonal patterns of deep soil water storage at watershed scales",
abstract = "Soil-water storage (SWS)highly correlates with changes to land use and land restoration, and is an important variable for managing water resources and environmental restoration in water-limited terrestrial ecosystems. The Gully Land Consolidation project (GLC)was implemented in 2011 on the Chinese Loess Plateau and it may influence the spatial distribution and temporal variability of SWS at the watershed scale. However, there have been limited studies assessing the magnitude and pattern of such changes. We measured SWS to a depth of 5 m nine times over four seasons across two watersheds-one treated by the GLC project (GT-T, n = 89)and the other untreated (GT-U, n = 72). We then used correlation analysis, principle component analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, generalized linear model, and regression kriging to evaluate the seasonal variability, as well as spatial patterns, of SWS. Mean SWS in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter ranged from 830 to 934 mm in the GT-T watershed and from 681 to 771 mm in the GT-U watershed. Land use was the most important factor for predicting SWS in the two watersheds. After land management as a result of the GLC project, SWS exhibited different spatial patterns in the GT-T watershed compared with the GT-U watershed. Dynamics of SWS between adjacent seasons in the GT-U watershed displayed more variability than that in the GT-T watershed. In both watersheds, soil water volume (SWV, i.e., SWS per unit area × watershed area)declined from spring to summer (-3.9{\%} in the GT-T and -13.4{\%} in the GT-U), and increased from summer to autumn (11.7{\%} in the GT-T and 20.7{\%} in the GT-U). After the whole year, SWV displayed different degrees of increase in the two watersheds (10.6{\%} in the GT-T, 2.7{\%} in the GT-U)due to the effect of land restoration. The ratios of SWV in the gully land filled in the GT-T watershed to the SWV of the whole GT-T watershed for the four seasons ranged from 21.4–23.3{\%}, with a mean value of 22{\%}. Our results provide new insights regarding how human engineering of landscapes (as exemplified by GLC project)affect the spatial distribution of SWS and the dynamics of SWV storing capacity at the watershed scale. Understanding the dynamics of SWS/SWV between seasons is essential to evaluate, model and manage the soil water resources in human-affected watersheds.",
author = "Yali Zhao and Yunqiang Wang and Hui Sun and Hangsheng Lin and Zhao Jin and Meina He and Yunlong Yu and Weijian Zhou and Zhisheng An",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "280",
pages = "129--141",
journal = "Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Intensive land restoration profoundly alters the spatial and seasonal patterns of deep soil water storage at watershed scales. / Zhao, Yali; Wang, Yunqiang; Sun, Hui; Lin, Hangsheng; Jin, Zhao; He, Meina; Yu, Yunlong; Zhou, Weijian; An, Zhisheng.

In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 280, 01.08.2019, p. 129-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intensive land restoration profoundly alters the spatial and seasonal patterns of deep soil water storage at watershed scales

AU - Zhao, Yali

AU - Wang, Yunqiang

AU - Sun, Hui

AU - Lin, Hangsheng

AU - Jin, Zhao

AU - He, Meina

AU - Yu, Yunlong

AU - Zhou, Weijian

AU - An, Zhisheng

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Soil-water storage (SWS)highly correlates with changes to land use and land restoration, and is an important variable for managing water resources and environmental restoration in water-limited terrestrial ecosystems. The Gully Land Consolidation project (GLC)was implemented in 2011 on the Chinese Loess Plateau and it may influence the spatial distribution and temporal variability of SWS at the watershed scale. However, there have been limited studies assessing the magnitude and pattern of such changes. We measured SWS to a depth of 5 m nine times over four seasons across two watersheds-one treated by the GLC project (GT-T, n = 89)and the other untreated (GT-U, n = 72). We then used correlation analysis, principle component analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, generalized linear model, and regression kriging to evaluate the seasonal variability, as well as spatial patterns, of SWS. Mean SWS in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter ranged from 830 to 934 mm in the GT-T watershed and from 681 to 771 mm in the GT-U watershed. Land use was the most important factor for predicting SWS in the two watersheds. After land management as a result of the GLC project, SWS exhibited different spatial patterns in the GT-T watershed compared with the GT-U watershed. Dynamics of SWS between adjacent seasons in the GT-U watershed displayed more variability than that in the GT-T watershed. In both watersheds, soil water volume (SWV, i.e., SWS per unit area × watershed area)declined from spring to summer (-3.9% in the GT-T and -13.4% in the GT-U), and increased from summer to autumn (11.7% in the GT-T and 20.7% in the GT-U). After the whole year, SWV displayed different degrees of increase in the two watersheds (10.6% in the GT-T, 2.7% in the GT-U)due to the effect of land restoration. The ratios of SWV in the gully land filled in the GT-T watershed to the SWV of the whole GT-T watershed for the four seasons ranged from 21.4–23.3%, with a mean value of 22%. Our results provide new insights regarding how human engineering of landscapes (as exemplified by GLC project)affect the spatial distribution of SWS and the dynamics of SWV storing capacity at the watershed scale. Understanding the dynamics of SWS/SWV between seasons is essential to evaluate, model and manage the soil water resources in human-affected watersheds.

AB - Soil-water storage (SWS)highly correlates with changes to land use and land restoration, and is an important variable for managing water resources and environmental restoration in water-limited terrestrial ecosystems. The Gully Land Consolidation project (GLC)was implemented in 2011 on the Chinese Loess Plateau and it may influence the spatial distribution and temporal variability of SWS at the watershed scale. However, there have been limited studies assessing the magnitude and pattern of such changes. We measured SWS to a depth of 5 m nine times over four seasons across two watersheds-one treated by the GLC project (GT-T, n = 89)and the other untreated (GT-U, n = 72). We then used correlation analysis, principle component analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, generalized linear model, and regression kriging to evaluate the seasonal variability, as well as spatial patterns, of SWS. Mean SWS in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter ranged from 830 to 934 mm in the GT-T watershed and from 681 to 771 mm in the GT-U watershed. Land use was the most important factor for predicting SWS in the two watersheds. After land management as a result of the GLC project, SWS exhibited different spatial patterns in the GT-T watershed compared with the GT-U watershed. Dynamics of SWS between adjacent seasons in the GT-U watershed displayed more variability than that in the GT-T watershed. In both watersheds, soil water volume (SWV, i.e., SWS per unit area × watershed area)declined from spring to summer (-3.9% in the GT-T and -13.4% in the GT-U), and increased from summer to autumn (11.7% in the GT-T and 20.7% in the GT-U). After the whole year, SWV displayed different degrees of increase in the two watersheds (10.6% in the GT-T, 2.7% in the GT-U)due to the effect of land restoration. The ratios of SWV in the gully land filled in the GT-T watershed to the SWV of the whole GT-T watershed for the four seasons ranged from 21.4–23.3%, with a mean value of 22%. Our results provide new insights regarding how human engineering of landscapes (as exemplified by GLC project)affect the spatial distribution of SWS and the dynamics of SWV storing capacity at the watershed scale. Understanding the dynamics of SWS/SWV between seasons is essential to evaluate, model and manage the soil water resources in human-affected watersheds.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065138012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065138012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.028

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.028

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065138012

VL - 280

SP - 129

EP - 141

JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

SN - 0167-8809

ER -