Interaction between endemic and introduced entomopathogenic nematodes in conventional-till and no-till corn

Leah C. Millar, Mary Ellen Barbercheck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We used entomopathogenic nematodes as a model to address the issue of environmental impact of introduced biological control agents in the soil. The study was conducted during three field seasons (1997, 1998, and 1999) in no-till and conventional-till corn near Goldsboro, North Carolina. The main objective was to evaluate the interaction of two endemic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, and an introduced exotic nematode, Steinernema riobrave (Texas). Two baiting methods with Galleria mellonella were used to evaluate the nematodes with regard to infected insects and nematode persistence when alone or in cohabitation in the field. We also examined the effects of soil depth on the nematodes' interactions, infectivity, and persistence. The results of the two baiting methods generally agreed with each other. The detection of H. bacteriophora was significantly suppressed in the presence of S. riobrave and slightly more so in conventional-till than in no-till. However, this endemic nematode was not completely displaced 1 and 2 years after the introduction of S. riobrave. Detection of S. carpocapsae and S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of each other, and detection of S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of H. bacteriophora. H. bacteriophora had the strongest tendency to be detected deeper in the soil profile, followed by S. riobrave and then S. carpocapsae. The nematodes' differences in environmental tolerances, differences in tendencies to disperse deeper in the soil profile, and patchy distributions may help explain their coexistence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-245
Number of pages11
JournalBiological Control
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Steinernema riobravis
entomopathogenic nematodes
conventional tillage
no-tillage
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora
Nematoda
corn
Steinernema carpocapsae
baiting
soil profiles
Galleria mellonella
soil depth
biological control agents
environmental impact
pathogenicity
insects
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Insect Science

Cite this

@article{2658d75ae0f44bc4896f045f0d6ebbde,
title = "Interaction between endemic and introduced entomopathogenic nematodes in conventional-till and no-till corn",
abstract = "We used entomopathogenic nematodes as a model to address the issue of environmental impact of introduced biological control agents in the soil. The study was conducted during three field seasons (1997, 1998, and 1999) in no-till and conventional-till corn near Goldsboro, North Carolina. The main objective was to evaluate the interaction of two endemic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, and an introduced exotic nematode, Steinernema riobrave (Texas). Two baiting methods with Galleria mellonella were used to evaluate the nematodes with regard to infected insects and nematode persistence when alone or in cohabitation in the field. We also examined the effects of soil depth on the nematodes' interactions, infectivity, and persistence. The results of the two baiting methods generally agreed with each other. The detection of H. bacteriophora was significantly suppressed in the presence of S. riobrave and slightly more so in conventional-till than in no-till. However, this endemic nematode was not completely displaced 1 and 2 years after the introduction of S. riobrave. Detection of S. carpocapsae and S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of each other, and detection of S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of H. bacteriophora. H. bacteriophora had the strongest tendency to be detected deeper in the soil profile, followed by S. riobrave and then S. carpocapsae. The nematodes' differences in environmental tolerances, differences in tendencies to disperse deeper in the soil profile, and patchy distributions may help explain their coexistence.",
author = "Millar, {Leah C.} and Barbercheck, {Mary Ellen}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/bcon.2001.0978",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "235--245",
journal = "Biological Control",
issn = "1049-9644",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Interaction between endemic and introduced entomopathogenic nematodes in conventional-till and no-till corn. / Millar, Leah C.; Barbercheck, Mary Ellen.

In: Biological Control, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 235-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction between endemic and introduced entomopathogenic nematodes in conventional-till and no-till corn

AU - Millar, Leah C.

AU - Barbercheck, Mary Ellen

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - We used entomopathogenic nematodes as a model to address the issue of environmental impact of introduced biological control agents in the soil. The study was conducted during three field seasons (1997, 1998, and 1999) in no-till and conventional-till corn near Goldsboro, North Carolina. The main objective was to evaluate the interaction of two endemic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, and an introduced exotic nematode, Steinernema riobrave (Texas). Two baiting methods with Galleria mellonella were used to evaluate the nematodes with regard to infected insects and nematode persistence when alone or in cohabitation in the field. We also examined the effects of soil depth on the nematodes' interactions, infectivity, and persistence. The results of the two baiting methods generally agreed with each other. The detection of H. bacteriophora was significantly suppressed in the presence of S. riobrave and slightly more so in conventional-till than in no-till. However, this endemic nematode was not completely displaced 1 and 2 years after the introduction of S. riobrave. Detection of S. carpocapsae and S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of each other, and detection of S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of H. bacteriophora. H. bacteriophora had the strongest tendency to be detected deeper in the soil profile, followed by S. riobrave and then S. carpocapsae. The nematodes' differences in environmental tolerances, differences in tendencies to disperse deeper in the soil profile, and patchy distributions may help explain their coexistence.

AB - We used entomopathogenic nematodes as a model to address the issue of environmental impact of introduced biological control agents in the soil. The study was conducted during three field seasons (1997, 1998, and 1999) in no-till and conventional-till corn near Goldsboro, North Carolina. The main objective was to evaluate the interaction of two endemic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, and an introduced exotic nematode, Steinernema riobrave (Texas). Two baiting methods with Galleria mellonella were used to evaluate the nematodes with regard to infected insects and nematode persistence when alone or in cohabitation in the field. We also examined the effects of soil depth on the nematodes' interactions, infectivity, and persistence. The results of the two baiting methods generally agreed with each other. The detection of H. bacteriophora was significantly suppressed in the presence of S. riobrave and slightly more so in conventional-till than in no-till. However, this endemic nematode was not completely displaced 1 and 2 years after the introduction of S. riobrave. Detection of S. carpocapsae and S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of each other, and detection of S. riobrave was not affected by the presence of H. bacteriophora. H. bacteriophora had the strongest tendency to be detected deeper in the soil profile, followed by S. riobrave and then S. carpocapsae. The nematodes' differences in environmental tolerances, differences in tendencies to disperse deeper in the soil profile, and patchy distributions may help explain their coexistence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035180729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035180729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/bcon.2001.0978

DO - 10.1006/bcon.2001.0978

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035180729

VL - 22

SP - 235

EP - 245

JO - Biological Control

JF - Biological Control

SN - 1049-9644

IS - 3

ER -