Interaction, change, and the role of the historical in validation: The case of L2 dynamic assessment

Matthew Edward Poehner, Rémi A. Van Compernolle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the implications of argument-based validity for the continued development of dynamic assessment (DA) research and practice. We propose that the move toward validation as a process of interpretation and evidence-based argument is commensurable with DA but that fundamental ontological differences with conventional approaches to measurement must be recognized. Following Ollman's (2003) explication of dialectical thinking, and in particular the distinction between philosophies of external and internal relations, we submit that the standard view of abilities as discrete traits is untenable in DA. Instead, abilities must be understood in a manner that takes account of (a) available forms of mediation and (b) change that occurs over the course of DA. To illustrate how a process of validation might be undertaken in DA, we present findings from recent DA studies involving second language learners. Our discussion brings into focus both learner participation in DA interactions and score changes over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-46
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Cognitive Education and Psychology
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Aptitude
interaction
Language
Research
ability
mediation
interpretation
participation
language
Thinking
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{fdf546c1c6de44e09067a591c874ec85,
title = "Interaction, change, and the role of the historical in validation: The case of L2 dynamic assessment",
abstract = "This article examines the implications of argument-based validity for the continued development of dynamic assessment (DA) research and practice. We propose that the move toward validation as a process of interpretation and evidence-based argument is commensurable with DA but that fundamental ontological differences with conventional approaches to measurement must be recognized. Following Ollman's (2003) explication of dialectical thinking, and in particular the distinction between philosophies of external and internal relations, we submit that the standard view of abilities as discrete traits is untenable in DA. Instead, abilities must be understood in a manner that takes account of (a) available forms of mediation and (b) change that occurs over the course of DA. To illustrate how a process of validation might be undertaken in DA, we present findings from recent DA studies involving second language learners. Our discussion brings into focus both learner participation in DA interactions and score changes over time.",
author = "Poehner, {Matthew Edward} and {Van Compernolle}, {R{\'e}mi A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1891/1945-8959.17.1.28",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "28--46",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology",
issn = "1945-8959",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

Interaction, change, and the role of the historical in validation : The case of L2 dynamic assessment. / Poehner, Matthew Edward; Van Compernolle, Rémi A.

In: Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 28-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction, change, and the role of the historical in validation

T2 - The case of L2 dynamic assessment

AU - Poehner, Matthew Edward

AU - Van Compernolle, Rémi A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This article examines the implications of argument-based validity for the continued development of dynamic assessment (DA) research and practice. We propose that the move toward validation as a process of interpretation and evidence-based argument is commensurable with DA but that fundamental ontological differences with conventional approaches to measurement must be recognized. Following Ollman's (2003) explication of dialectical thinking, and in particular the distinction between philosophies of external and internal relations, we submit that the standard view of abilities as discrete traits is untenable in DA. Instead, abilities must be understood in a manner that takes account of (a) available forms of mediation and (b) change that occurs over the course of DA. To illustrate how a process of validation might be undertaken in DA, we present findings from recent DA studies involving second language learners. Our discussion brings into focus both learner participation in DA interactions and score changes over time.

AB - This article examines the implications of argument-based validity for the continued development of dynamic assessment (DA) research and practice. We propose that the move toward validation as a process of interpretation and evidence-based argument is commensurable with DA but that fundamental ontological differences with conventional approaches to measurement must be recognized. Following Ollman's (2003) explication of dialectical thinking, and in particular the distinction between philosophies of external and internal relations, we submit that the standard view of abilities as discrete traits is untenable in DA. Instead, abilities must be understood in a manner that takes account of (a) available forms of mediation and (b) change that occurs over the course of DA. To illustrate how a process of validation might be undertaken in DA, we present findings from recent DA studies involving second language learners. Our discussion brings into focus both learner participation in DA interactions and score changes over time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061043546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061043546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1891/1945-8959.17.1.28

DO - 10.1891/1945-8959.17.1.28

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061043546

VL - 17

SP - 28

EP - 46

JO - Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology

SN - 1945-8959

IS - 1

ER -