Interhospital patient transport by rotary wing aircraft in a combat environment: risks, adverse events, and process improvement.

Ryan Lehmann, John Oh, Sherry Killius, Mark Cornell, Elizabeth Furay, Matthew Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Helicopter transport of injured or ill patients in Operation Iraqi Freedom is a necessary but often high-risk endeavor. Our facility initiated a thorough process improvement and standardization initiative after several adverse outcomes. This report describes the results after this initiative, and evaluates the applicability of a civilian transport risk assessment tool to the combat environment. METHODS: Review of all preflight, in-flight, and postflight records for helicopter medevac missions over a 7-month period. Adverse events included major equipment failures, clinical deterioration, or the need for urgent interventions on arrival. Transport risk scores (TRS) were calculated and assessed for correlation with adverse events. RESULTS: There were 149 patient transports identified, 95 (64%) for trauma (mean Injury Severity Score, 21) and 54 (36%) for medical illness. Major surgical intervention before the flight was required in 66 (44%), massive transfusion in 29 (20%), and the majority were transported within 8 hours of surgery. In-flight mechanical ventilation was required in 53%, and 20% required vasopressors or cardioactive medications. Adverse events included equipment failures in 17% of flights, in-flight clinical deterioration in 30%, and 9% required an urgent intervention on arrival. However, there were no deaths or significant flight-related morbidities identified. The mean TRS was significantly higher in patients with adverse events (9.1) versus those without (7.4, p < 0.05), but it showed only moderate discriminative ability (area under curve = 0.65, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Helicopter transport in a combat environment carries significant risk of adverse events because of the patient characteristics and inherent limitations of the transport platform. Strict attention to standardization, training, and process improvement is necessary to achieve optimal outcomes. The civilian TRS had lower discriminative ability in this military setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalThe Journal of trauma
Volume66
Issue number4 Suppl
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Aircraft
Equipment Failure
2003-2011 Iraq War
Injury Severity Score
Sorbitol
Artificial Respiration
Area Under Curve
Morbidity
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Lehmann, Ryan ; Oh, John ; Killius, Sherry ; Cornell, Mark ; Furay, Elizabeth ; Martin, Matthew. / Interhospital patient transport by rotary wing aircraft in a combat environment : risks, adverse events, and process improvement. In: The Journal of trauma. 2009 ; Vol. 66, No. 4 Suppl.
@article{71ed5bc516304728899228e4e812d127,
title = "Interhospital patient transport by rotary wing aircraft in a combat environment: risks, adverse events, and process improvement.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Helicopter transport of injured or ill patients in Operation Iraqi Freedom is a necessary but often high-risk endeavor. Our facility initiated a thorough process improvement and standardization initiative after several adverse outcomes. This report describes the results after this initiative, and evaluates the applicability of a civilian transport risk assessment tool to the combat environment. METHODS: Review of all preflight, in-flight, and postflight records for helicopter medevac missions over a 7-month period. Adverse events included major equipment failures, clinical deterioration, or the need for urgent interventions on arrival. Transport risk scores (TRS) were calculated and assessed for correlation with adverse events. RESULTS: There were 149 patient transports identified, 95 (64{\%}) for trauma (mean Injury Severity Score, 21) and 54 (36{\%}) for medical illness. Major surgical intervention before the flight was required in 66 (44{\%}), massive transfusion in 29 (20{\%}), and the majority were transported within 8 hours of surgery. In-flight mechanical ventilation was required in 53{\%}, and 20{\%} required vasopressors or cardioactive medications. Adverse events included equipment failures in 17{\%} of flights, in-flight clinical deterioration in 30{\%}, and 9{\%} required an urgent intervention on arrival. However, there were no deaths or significant flight-related morbidities identified. The mean TRS was significantly higher in patients with adverse events (9.1) versus those without (7.4, p < 0.05), but it showed only moderate discriminative ability (area under curve = 0.65, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Helicopter transport in a combat environment carries significant risk of adverse events because of the patient characteristics and inherent limitations of the transport platform. Strict attention to standardization, training, and process improvement is necessary to achieve optimal outcomes. The civilian TRS had lower discriminative ability in this military setting.",
author = "Ryan Lehmann and John Oh and Sherry Killius and Mark Cornell and Elizabeth Furay and Matthew Martin",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4 Suppl",

}

Interhospital patient transport by rotary wing aircraft in a combat environment : risks, adverse events, and process improvement. / Lehmann, Ryan; Oh, John; Killius, Sherry; Cornell, Mark; Furay, Elizabeth; Martin, Matthew.

In: The Journal of trauma, Vol. 66, No. 4 Suppl, 04.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interhospital patient transport by rotary wing aircraft in a combat environment

T2 - risks, adverse events, and process improvement.

AU - Lehmann, Ryan

AU - Oh, John

AU - Killius, Sherry

AU - Cornell, Mark

AU - Furay, Elizabeth

AU - Martin, Matthew

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Helicopter transport of injured or ill patients in Operation Iraqi Freedom is a necessary but often high-risk endeavor. Our facility initiated a thorough process improvement and standardization initiative after several adverse outcomes. This report describes the results after this initiative, and evaluates the applicability of a civilian transport risk assessment tool to the combat environment. METHODS: Review of all preflight, in-flight, and postflight records for helicopter medevac missions over a 7-month period. Adverse events included major equipment failures, clinical deterioration, or the need for urgent interventions on arrival. Transport risk scores (TRS) were calculated and assessed for correlation with adverse events. RESULTS: There were 149 patient transports identified, 95 (64%) for trauma (mean Injury Severity Score, 21) and 54 (36%) for medical illness. Major surgical intervention before the flight was required in 66 (44%), massive transfusion in 29 (20%), and the majority were transported within 8 hours of surgery. In-flight mechanical ventilation was required in 53%, and 20% required vasopressors or cardioactive medications. Adverse events included equipment failures in 17% of flights, in-flight clinical deterioration in 30%, and 9% required an urgent intervention on arrival. However, there were no deaths or significant flight-related morbidities identified. The mean TRS was significantly higher in patients with adverse events (9.1) versus those without (7.4, p < 0.05), but it showed only moderate discriminative ability (area under curve = 0.65, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Helicopter transport in a combat environment carries significant risk of adverse events because of the patient characteristics and inherent limitations of the transport platform. Strict attention to standardization, training, and process improvement is necessary to achieve optimal outcomes. The civilian TRS had lower discriminative ability in this military setting.

AB - BACKGROUND: Helicopter transport of injured or ill patients in Operation Iraqi Freedom is a necessary but often high-risk endeavor. Our facility initiated a thorough process improvement and standardization initiative after several adverse outcomes. This report describes the results after this initiative, and evaluates the applicability of a civilian transport risk assessment tool to the combat environment. METHODS: Review of all preflight, in-flight, and postflight records for helicopter medevac missions over a 7-month period. Adverse events included major equipment failures, clinical deterioration, or the need for urgent interventions on arrival. Transport risk scores (TRS) were calculated and assessed for correlation with adverse events. RESULTS: There were 149 patient transports identified, 95 (64%) for trauma (mean Injury Severity Score, 21) and 54 (36%) for medical illness. Major surgical intervention before the flight was required in 66 (44%), massive transfusion in 29 (20%), and the majority were transported within 8 hours of surgery. In-flight mechanical ventilation was required in 53%, and 20% required vasopressors or cardioactive medications. Adverse events included equipment failures in 17% of flights, in-flight clinical deterioration in 30%, and 9% required an urgent intervention on arrival. However, there were no deaths or significant flight-related morbidities identified. The mean TRS was significantly higher in patients with adverse events (9.1) versus those without (7.4, p < 0.05), but it showed only moderate discriminative ability (area under curve = 0.65, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Helicopter transport in a combat environment carries significant risk of adverse events because of the patient characteristics and inherent limitations of the transport platform. Strict attention to standardization, training, and process improvement is necessary to achieve optimal outcomes. The civilian TRS had lower discriminative ability in this military setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649216488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649216488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19359968

VL - 66

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4 Suppl

ER -