Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group

Tim Wildschut, Chester A. Insko, Thomas Bradley Pinter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An experiment assessed the prisoner's dilemma game (PDG) choices of a set of three persons who interacted with another supposed set of three persons. There were four conditions: (1) group-on-group (both three-person sets constrained by a majority vote), (2) group-on-one (only own three-person set constrained by a majority vote), (3) one-on-group (only other three-person set constrained by a majority vote), (4) one-on-one (neither three-person set constrained by a majority vote). The four conditions were compared with three orthogonal contrasts. Consistent with the assumption that interindividual interactions are less competitive than interactions involving groups, the first contrast indicated that there were fewer competitive choices in the one-on-one condition than in the other three conditions pooled. Consistent with the assumption that competitiveness con flow either from acting as a group or interacting with a group, the second contrast found no significant difference between the group-on-one and one-on-group conditions. Finally, consistent with the assumption that the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect is a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group, the third contrast revealed that there were more competitive choices in the group-on-group condition than in the one-on-group and group-on-one conditions pooled.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)390-399
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2007

Fingerprint

Prisoner Dilemma

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{04fbd876471048ac963d0b7ff734d541,
title = "Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group",
abstract = "An experiment assessed the prisoner's dilemma game (PDG) choices of a set of three persons who interacted with another supposed set of three persons. There were four conditions: (1) group-on-group (both three-person sets constrained by a majority vote), (2) group-on-one (only own three-person set constrained by a majority vote), (3) one-on-group (only other three-person set constrained by a majority vote), (4) one-on-one (neither three-person set constrained by a majority vote). The four conditions were compared with three orthogonal contrasts. Consistent with the assumption that interindividual interactions are less competitive than interactions involving groups, the first contrast indicated that there were fewer competitive choices in the one-on-one condition than in the other three conditions pooled. Consistent with the assumption that competitiveness con flow either from acting as a group or interacting with a group, the second contrast found no significant difference between the group-on-one and one-on-group conditions. Finally, consistent with the assumption that the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect is a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group, the third contrast revealed that there were more competitive choices in the group-on-group condition than in the one-on-group and group-on-one conditions pooled.",
author = "Tim Wildschut and Insko, {Chester A.} and Pinter, {Thomas Bradley}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.374",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "390--399",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group. / Wildschut, Tim; Insko, Chester A.; Pinter, Thomas Bradley.

In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.03.2007, p. 390-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group

AU - Wildschut, Tim

AU - Insko, Chester A.

AU - Pinter, Thomas Bradley

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - An experiment assessed the prisoner's dilemma game (PDG) choices of a set of three persons who interacted with another supposed set of three persons. There were four conditions: (1) group-on-group (both three-person sets constrained by a majority vote), (2) group-on-one (only own three-person set constrained by a majority vote), (3) one-on-group (only other three-person set constrained by a majority vote), (4) one-on-one (neither three-person set constrained by a majority vote). The four conditions were compared with three orthogonal contrasts. Consistent with the assumption that interindividual interactions are less competitive than interactions involving groups, the first contrast indicated that there were fewer competitive choices in the one-on-one condition than in the other three conditions pooled. Consistent with the assumption that competitiveness con flow either from acting as a group or interacting with a group, the second contrast found no significant difference between the group-on-one and one-on-group conditions. Finally, consistent with the assumption that the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect is a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group, the third contrast revealed that there were more competitive choices in the group-on-group condition than in the one-on-group and group-on-one conditions pooled.

AB - An experiment assessed the prisoner's dilemma game (PDG) choices of a set of three persons who interacted with another supposed set of three persons. There were four conditions: (1) group-on-group (both three-person sets constrained by a majority vote), (2) group-on-one (only own three-person set constrained by a majority vote), (3) one-on-group (only other three-person set constrained by a majority vote), (4) one-on-one (neither three-person set constrained by a majority vote). The four conditions were compared with three orthogonal contrasts. Consistent with the assumption that interindividual interactions are less competitive than interactions involving groups, the first contrast indicated that there were fewer competitive choices in the one-on-one condition than in the other three conditions pooled. Consistent with the assumption that competitiveness con flow either from acting as a group or interacting with a group, the second contrast found no significant difference between the group-on-one and one-on-group conditions. Finally, consistent with the assumption that the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect is a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group, the third contrast revealed that there were more competitive choices in the group-on-group condition than in the one-on-group and group-on-one conditions pooled.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947271390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947271390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.374

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.374

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 390

EP - 399

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 2

ER -